Economic impact of decreasing stocking densities in broiler rabbit production based on Belgian farm data

Authors

  • Ann Verspecht Ghent University
  • Luc Maertens Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research
  • F. Vanhonacker Ghent University
  • Frank Tuyttens Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research
  • Guido Van Huylenbroeck Ghent University
  • Wim Verbeke Ghent University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2011.849

Abstract

Stocking density is a prominent issue in public debates on farm animal welfare. Public perceptions and economic impact of reduced stocking density should be considered, along with effects on animal performances and welfare.  In this paper, experimental data and accountancy data based on 15 Belgian farms were combined to calculate the financial impact of different stocking densities on broiler rabbit farm profitability.  Using the partial budget technique, only those elements that change with stocking density were taken into account.  From the experiment, feed conversion and feed intake were found to increase slightly though significantly with decreasing stocking density, although only 5% and 6% of the variation, respectively, were explained by stocking density.  However, reducing stocking density implies a recalculation of all costs in a reduced number of broiler rabbits, which has a negative impact on farm profitability.  Reducing stocking density from the standard situation of 15 rabbits per m² to 10 rabbits per m² reduced added value by €22 per doe.  In general, farm income was low and amounted to only €28.10 per doe during 2006-2008 for the reference situation of 15 rabbits per m².  Below a density of 9 rabbits/m², a negative farm income was calculated.  Sensitivity analysis showed that rabbit meat price has a stronger influence on the added value at a given density than rabbit feed price.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ann Verspecht, Ghent University

Department of Agricultural Economics

Luc Maertens, Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research

Animal Science Unit

F. Vanhonacker, Ghent University

Department of Agricultural Economics

Frank Tuyttens, Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research

Animal Science Unit

Guido Van Huylenbroeck, Ghent University

Department of Agricultural Economics

Wim Verbeke, Ghent University

Department of Agricultural Economics

References

REFERENCES

Allen, M. S., 2006. Choosing corn hybrids for silage: A partial budget approach. J. Anim. Sci. 84, 281-282.

Austrian Federal Chancellery, 2004. Federal Act on the Protection of Animals (Animal Protection Act - TSchG) Federal Law Gazette I No. 118/2004.

Boehlje, M. D., Eidman, V. R., 1984. Farm management. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Buijs, S., 2011. Using Spatial Distribution and Behaviour to Determine Optimal Space Allowances for Poultry and Rabbits. Doctoral diss., Department of Animal Environment and Health, Uppsala, Sweden, SLU, pp. 97.

Buijs, S., Keeling, L., Tuyttens, F. A. M., 2009. Fearfulness in meat type rabbits at different stocking densities. 16th International Symposium on Housing and Diseases of Rabbits, Furproviding Animals and Pet Animals, Celle, Germany, Deutsche Veterinärmedizinische Gesellschaft e.v., pp. 120-126.

Cox, W. J., Cherney, J. H., Hanchar, J. H., 2009. Zone Tillage Depth Affects Yield and Economics of Corn Silage Production. Agron. J. 101 (5), 1093-1098, doi:10.2134/agronj2009.0005

Dalsted, N. L., Gutierrez, P. H., 1992. Partial Budgeting. Farm & Ranch Series, Economics, No 3.760, 9/1992, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension Service: Fort Collins, Colorado, http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/farmmgt/03761.pdf, Accessed September 2010.

Dijkhuizen, A. A., Morris, R. S., 1997. Animal health economics: principles and applications. University of Sydney, Sydney.

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2005. The Impact of the current housing and husbandry systems on the health and welfare of farmed domestic rabbits. EFSA-Q-2004-023, pp. 137, http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/267.pdf, Accessed January 2011.

Ehui, S., Rey, B., 1992. Partial budget analysis for on-station and on-farm small ruminant production systems research : Method and data requirements., ILCA (International Livestock Centre for Africa), ILRAD, Nairobi, Kenya, pp. 91-104.

Engle, C. R., Brown, D., 1999. Growth, yield, dressout, and net returns of bighead carp Hypophthalmichthys nobilis stocked at three densities in fertilized earthen ponds. J. World Aquac. Soc. 30 (3), 371-379.

doi:10.1111/j.1749-7345.1999.tb00688.x

Lassen, J., Sandøe, P., Forkman, B., 2006. Happy pigs are dirty! - conflicting perspectives on animal welfare. Livest. Sci. 103 (3), 221-230.

doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.008

Lebas, F., 2010. Situation cunicole en France en 2009 : Performances moyennes des élevages selon les résultats de RENACEB pour l'année 2009, situation du marché cunicole français et premières évaluations pour l'année 2010. Cuniculture Magazine 37, 74-82, http://www.cuniculture.info/Docs/Magazine/Magazine2010/mag37-074.html, Accessed January 2011.

Maertens, L., De Groote, G., 1984. Influence of the number of fryer rabbits per cage on their performances. J. Appl. Rabbit Research 7, 151-155.

Maertens, L., Van Poucke, E., Buijs, S., 2009. Influence of cage size and enrichment on the productive performances of growing rabbits housed in groups of 8. 16th International Symposium on Housing and Diseases of Rabbits, Furproviding Animals and Pet Animals, Celle, Germany, Deutsche Veterinärmedizinische Gesellschaft e.v., pp. 286-291.

María, G. A., 2006. Public perception of farm animal welfare in Spain. Livest. Sci. 103 (3), 250-256.

doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.011

McInerney, J., 2004. Animal welfare, economics and policy. Report on a study undertaken for the Farm & Animal Health Economics Division of DEFRA., Exeter, UK, pp. 80, http://www.defra.gov.uk/evidence/economics/foodfarm/reports/documents/animalwelfare.pdf, Accessed January 2011.

Nahamya, F. H., Mukiibi-Muka, G., Nasinyama, G. W., Kabasa, J. D., 2006. Assessment of the cost effectiveness of vaccinating free range poultry against Newcastle disease in Busedde sub-county, Jinja district, Uganda. Livestock Research for Rural Development 18.

Overton, M. W., 2005. Cost comparison of natural service sires and artificial insemination for dairy cattle reproductive management. Theriogenology 64 (3), 589-602, doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.015

Productschap Pluimvee en Eieren, 2006. Verordening welzijnsnormen konijnen, Productschap Pluimvee en Eieren, Zoetermeer, Nederland.

Rommers, J., Meijerhof, R., 1998. Effect of group size on performance, bone strength and skin lesions of meat rabbits housed under commercial conditions. World Rabbit Sci. 6, 299-302.

Swiss Federal Council, 1981. Swiss Ordinance on Animal Protection.

Szendrő, Z., Princz, Z., Romvári, R., Locsmándi, L., Szabó, A., Bázár, G., Radnai, I., Biró-Németh, E., Matics, Z., Nagy, I., 2009. Effect of group size and stocking density on productive, carcass, meat quality and aggression traits of growing rabbits. World Rabbit Sci. 17 (3), 153 - 162.

Szendro, Z., Zotte, A. D., 2011. Effect of housing conditions on production and behaviour of growing meat rabbits: A review. Livest. Sci. 137 (1-3), 296-303, doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.11.012

Trocino, A., Xiccato, G., 2006. Animal welfare in reared rabbits: A review with emphasis on housing systems. World Rabbit Sci. 14 (2), 77-93.

Van Poucke, E., Buijs, S., Tuyttens, F. A. M., 2009. Does stocking density affect bone strength of broiler rabbits? 16th International Symposium on Housing and Diseases of Rabbits, Furproviding Animals and Pet Animals, Celle, Germany, Deutsche Veterinärmedizinische Gesellschaft e.v., pp. 269-275.

Vanhonacker, F., Van Poucke, E., Tuyttens, F. A. M., Verbeke, W., 2010. Citizens’ views on farm animal welfare and related information provision: exploratory insights from Flanders, Belgium. J. Agric. Envir. Ethics 23, 551-569.

doi:10.1007/s10806-010-9235-9

Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., Buijs, S., Tuyttens, F. A. M., 2009. Societal concern related to stocking density, pen size and group size in farm animal production. Livest. Sci. 123 (1), 16-22.

doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2008.09.023

Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., Tuyttens, F. A. M., 2008. Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently? Livest. Sci. 116, 126-136.

doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2007.09.017

Vermeij, I., Bosma, B., Evers, A., Hemmer, H., Vink, I., 2007. Kwantitatieve Informatie Veehouderij (KWIN-V) 2007-2008. Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen UR.

Verspecht, A., Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Zoons, J., Van Huylenbroeck, G., 2011. Economic impact of decreasing stocking densities in broiler production. Poultry Science "In press".

Xiccato, G., Verga, M., Trocino, A., Ferrante, V., Queaque, P. I., Sartori, A., 1999. Influence de l’effectif et de la densité par cage sur les performances productives, la qualité bouchère et le comportement chez le lapin. 8èmes Journées Recherche Cunicole, Paris, France, pp. 59-62.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Papers