Effect of competitive exclusion in rabbits using an autochthonous probiotic
Animal nutrition has been severely challenged by the ban on antimicrobials as growth promoters. This has fostered the study of alternative methods to avoid colonisation by pathogenic bacteria as well as to improve the growth of animals and feed conversion efficiency. These new options should not alter the normal intestinal microbiota, or affect it as little as possible. The use of probiotics, which are live microorganisms that beneficially affect the host by improving its intestinal microbial balance, can be seen as a promising way to achieve that goal. In this study, New Zealand White rabbits were fed diets containing an autochthonous probiotic of Enterococcus spp., with the strains EaI, EfaI and EfaD, and Escherichia coli, with the strains ECI 1, ECI 2 and ECD, during a 25-d trial, to evaluate the impact of the probiotic on the faecal microbiota, including population dynamics and antimicrobial resistance profiles. A control group of rabbits, which was fed a diet containing a commonly used mixture of antimicrobials (colistin, oxytetracycline, and valnemulin), was also studied. To assess the colonisation ability of the mentioned probiotic, the faecal microbiota of the rabbits was characterised up to 10 d after the administration had ended. Isolates of enterococci and E. coli were studied for phylogenetic relationships using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC-PCR) and pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), respectively. Although partially affected by an unexpected clinical impairment suffered by the rabbits in the experimental group, our results showed the following. The difference between the growth rate of the animals treated with antimicrobials and those fed the probiotic was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). The competitive exclusion product was present in the faecal samples in a large proportion, but stopped being recovered by culture as soon as the administration ended and the housing conditions were changed. Multidrug-resistant strains of enterococci and E. coli were more commonly recovered from faecal samples of animals fed diets containing antimicrobials, than from rabbits fed diets with our probiotic formula. The use of E. coli probiotics to prevent infection by enteropathogenic strains must be carefully considered due to the possible occurrence of gastrointestinal signs. On the other hand, enterococci strains may be more effective, but lack the long-term colonisation ability.
Alam S., Brailsford S.R., Whiley R.A., Beighton D. 1999. PCRBased Methods for Genotyping Viridans Group Streptococci. Journal of clinical microbiology, 37: 2772-2776.
Amber K.H., Yakout H.M., Hamed Rawya S. 2004. Effect of feeding diets containing yucca extract or probiotic on growth, digestibility, nitrogen balance and caecal microbial activity of growing New Zealand white rabbits. In Proc.: 8th World Rabbit Congress, September 7-10, 2004, Puebla, Mexico, 737-741.
Benato L., Hastie P., O’Shaughnessy P., Murray J.A. Meredith A. 2014. Effects of probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the faecal microflora of pet rabbits. J. Small Anim. Pract., 55: 442-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.12242
Bohman V.R. 1955. Compensatory growth of beef cattle. The effect of hay maturity. J. Anim. Sci., 14: 249-255. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1955.141249x
Casewell M., Friis C., Marco E., McMullin P., Phillips I. 2003. The European ban on growth-promoting antibiotics and emerging consequences for human and animal health. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 52: 159-161. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg313
Chu G.M., Lee S.J., Jeong H.S. Lee S.S. 2011. Efficacy of probiotics from anaerobic microflora with prebiotics on growth performance and noxious gas emission in growing pigs. Anim. Sci. J., 82: 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00828.x
Clermont O., Bonacorsi S., Bingen E. 2000. Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66: 4555-4558. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.10.4555-4558.2000
CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). 2007. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests; approved standard, 17th informational supplement. Wayne PA: CLSI publication M100-S17.
Combes S., Michelland R.J., Monteils V., Cauquil L., Soulié V., Tran N.U., Gidenne T., Fortun-Lamothe L. 2011. Postnatal development of the rabbit caecal microbiota composition and activity. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 77: 680-689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01148.x
Cox J.M., Chung B.L. 2000. Competitive exclusion: Probiotic preparations for poultry. Proc. Aust. Poult. Sci. Sym., 12: 32-39.
Da Costa P.M., Loureiro L., Matos A.J. 2013. Transfer of multidrugresistant bacteria between intermingled ecological niches: the interface between humans, animals and the environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 10: 278-294. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10010278
Dice L. 1945. Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species 1945. Ecology, 26: 297-302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1932409
European Commission. 2001. Commission of the European Communities, Commission Recommendation N. 2001/459/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union L., 161: 42-44.
European Commission. 2003. Commission of the European Communities, Commission Regulation N. 1831/2003. Off. J. Eur. Union L., 268: 29-43.
Ejrnaes K., Sandvang D., Lundgren B., Ferry S., Holm S., Monsen T., Lundholm R., Frimodt-Moller N. 2006. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of Escherichia coli strains from samples collected before and after pivmecillinam or placebo treatment of uncomplicated community-acquired urinary tract infection in women. J. Clin. Microbiol., 44: 1776-1781. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.5.1776-1781.2006
Eshar D., Weese J.S. 2014. Molecular analysis of the microbiota in hard feces from healthy rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) medicated with long term oral meloxicam. BMC Vet. Res., 10: 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-62
Falcão-e-Cunha L., Castro-Solla L., Maertens L., Marounek M., Pinheiro V., Freire J., Mourão J.L. 2007. Alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in rabbit feeding: A review. World Rabbit Sci., 15: 127-140. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2007.597
From C., Pukall R., Schumann P., Hormazabal V., Granun P.E. 2005. Toxin-producing ability among Bacillus spp. Outside the Bacillus cereus group. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71: 1178-1183. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.3.1178-1183.2005
Fuller R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 66: 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x
Galyean M.L., Eng K.S. 1998. Application of research findings and summary of research needs: Bud Britton Memorial Symposium on Metabolic Disorders of Feedlot Cattle. J. of Anim. Sci., 76: 323-327. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.761323x
Gardiner G., Stanton C., Lynch P.B., Collins J.K., Fitzgerald G., Ross R.P. 1999. Evaluation of cheddar cheese as a food carrier for delivery of a probiotic strain to the gastrointestinal tract. J. Dairy Sci., 82: 1379-1387. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75363-4
Hur I., Chun J. 2004 A method for comparing multiple bacterial community structures from 16S rDNA clone library sequences. J. microbial., 42: 9-13.
Idoui T., Karam N.E. 2016. Effects of autochthonous probiotic feeding on performances, carcass traits, serum composition and faecal microflora of broiler chickens. Sains Malaysiana, 45: 347-353.
Jackson C.R., Fedorka-Cray P.J., Barrett J.B. 2004. Use of a genus- and species-specific multiplex PCR for identification of enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol., 42: 3558-3565. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.8.3558-3565.2004
Jin L.Z., Marquardt R.R., Zhao X. 2000. A strain of Enterococcus faecium (18C23) inhibits adhesion of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 to porcine small intestine mucus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66: 4200-4204. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.10.4200-4204.2000
Jost M., Bracher-Jakob A. 2000. Yeast products as feed additives in weaning piglets. Agrarforschung, 7: 56-61.
Kudva I.T., Hunt C.W., Williams C.J., Nance U.M., Hodve C.J. 1997. Evaluation of dietary influences on Escherichia coli O157:H7 shedding by sheep. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63: 3878-3886.
La Ragione R.M., Narbad A., Gasson M.J., Woodward M.J. 2004. In vivo characterisation of Lactobacillus johnsonii FI9785 for use as a defined competitive exclusion agent against bacterial pathogens in poultry. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 38: 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01474.x
Licois D., Wyers M., Coudert P. 2005. Epizootic Rabbit Enteropathy: experimental transmission and clinical characterisation. Vet. Res., 36: 601-613. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2005021
Linaje R., Coloma M.D., Pérez-Martínez G., Zúñiga M. 2004. Characterisation of faecal enterococci from rabbits for the selection of probiotic strains. J. Appl. Microbiol., 96: 761-771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02191.x
Martins da Costa P., Oliveira M., Bica A., Vaz-Pires P., Bernardo F. 2007. Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli isolated from poultry feed and feed ingredients. Vet. Microbiol., 120: 122-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.10.005
Mathur S., Singh R. 2005. Antibiotic resistance in food lactic acid bacteria - a review. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 105: 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.03.008
Michelan A.C., Scapinello C., Natali M.R.M., Furlan A.C., Sakaguti E.S., Faria H.G., Santolin M.L.D., Hernandes A.B. 2002. Utilization of probiotic, organic acid and antibiotic in diets for growing rabbits. Essay of digestibility, evaluation of intestinal morphometry and performance. Braz. J. Anim. Sci., 31: 2227-2237.
Musa H.H., Wu S.L., Zhu C.H., Seri H.I., Zhu G.Q. 2009. The potential benefits of probiotics in animal production and health. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 8: 313-321.
Philippeau C., Respondek F., Julliand V. 2010. In vitro effects of fructo-oligosaccharides on bacterial concentration and fermentation profiles in veal calf ileal contents. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 162: 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.09.006
Ridha M.T., Azad I.S. 2015. Effect of autochthonous and commercial probiotic bacteria on growth, persistence, immunity and disease resistance in juvenile and adult Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Aquac. Res., 47: 2757-2767. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12726
Salyers A.A., Gupta A., Wang Y.P. 2004. Human intestinal bacteria as reservoirs for antibiotic resistance genes. Trends Microbiol., 12: 412-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2004.07.004 Schneitz C. 2005. Competitive exclusion in poultry - 30 years of research. Food Control, 16: 657-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.06.002
Simonová M., Lauková A. 2004. Isolation of faecal Enterococcus faecium strains from rabbits and their sensitivity to antibiotics and ability to bacteriocin production. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy, 48: 383-386.
Simonová M., Lauková A., Styriak I. 2005. Enterococci from rabbits - potential feed additive. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50: 416-421.
Simonová M.P., Lauková A., Chrastinová L., Strompfová V., Faix Š., Vasilková Z., Ondruška L., Jurčik R., Rafay J. 2009. Enterococcus faecium CCM7420, bacteriocin PPB CCM7420 and their effect in the digestive tract of rabbits. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 54: 376-386.
Stecher B., Hardt W.D. 2011. Mechanisms controlling pathogen colonization of the gut. Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 14: 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2010.10.003
Straw T.E. 1988. Bacteria of the rabbit gut and their role in the health of the rabbit. J. Appl. Rabbit Res., 11: 142-150.
Walter J. 2008. Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract: implications for fundamental and biomedical research. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 74: 4985-4996. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00753-08
Wei, G.F., Pan, L., Du, H.M., Chen, J.Y., Zhao, L.P. 2004. ERIC-PCR fingerprinting-based community DNA hybridization to pinpoint genome-specific fragments as molecular markers to identify and track populations common to healthy human guts. J. Microbiol. Methods, 59: 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2004.06.007
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
Cited-By (articles included in Crossref)
This journal is a Crossref Cited-by Linking member. This list shows the references that citing the article automatically, if there are. For more information about the system please visit Crossref site
1. Beneficial effects of Enterococcus faecium EF9a administration in rabbit diet
Monika Pogány Simonová, Andrea Lauková, Ľubica Chrastinová, Iveta Plachá, Renáta Szabóová, Anna Kandričáková, Rudolf Žitňan, Mária Chrenková, Ľubomír Ondruška, András Bónai, Zsolt Matics, Melinda Kovács, Viola Strompfová
World Rabbit Science vol: 28 issue: 4 first page: 169 year: 2020
Official journal of the World Rabbit Science Association (WRSA)
e-ISSN: 1989-8886 ISSN: 1257-5011 https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs