Effect of light intensities on reproductive performance, nursing behaviour and preference of rabbit does

Zs. Matics

Hungary

Kaposvár University

Department of Animal Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

Zs. Szendrő

Hungary

Kaposvár University

Department of Animal Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

I. Radnai

Hungary

Kaposvár University

Department of Animal Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

R. Kasza

Hungary

Kaposvár University

Department of Animal Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

Zs. Gerencsér

Hungary

Kaposvár University

Department of Animal Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

Submitted: 2015-09-09

|

Accepted: 2015-11-07

|

Published: 2016-06-29

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2016.4112
Funding Data

Downloads

Keywords:

rabbit, light intensity, reproductive performance, nursing behaviour, preference test

Supporting agencies:

This research was not funded

Abstract:

The aim of the experiment was to compare the reproductive performance and nursing behaviour of rabbit does reared under 2 different light intensities and observe the preference of does among cages with different light intensities. Female rabbits were randomly housed in 2 identical rooms, under the same housing conditions in wire-net cages. The 2 rooms only differed in the light intensity; group L: 150-200 lux (n=54 does, 230 inseminations), group D: 10-20 lux (n=54 does, 232 inseminations). Reproduction data from the first 5 consecutive reproductive cycles were evaluated. Nursing behaviour of the does (n = 24) was observed at the 2nd or 4th lactation. The preference of does (n=8) among 4 cages with different light intensities (10, 35, 75 or 155 lux)  as examined. There were 6-7% difference between the 2 groups in the number of kits born in total and those born alive (born total: 11.25 vs. 10.59 kits, P<0.1; liveborn: 10.75 vs. 10.00 kits, P<0.05; in groups L and D, respectively). Suckling mortality was nearly 2% higher in group D (L: 8.1, D: 10.0%; P<0.1), and in consequence the litter size of this group at 35 d of age was lower than that of the L rabbits (L: 8.75, D: 8.45 kits; P<0.05). The light intensity did not affect litter and individual weights at 35 d of age. The average numbers of daily nursing events (L: 1.23/d, D: 1.32/d), the length (L: 208±49, D: 213±43 s) and the daily distribution of nursing events were not affected by high light intensity. During the light period of the day, the darkest cage (10 lux) was the most preferred by the does (44.0, 18.6, 17.9 and 19.5% in 10, 35, 75 and 155 lux cages, respectively; P<0.001). The lower light intensity had no unambiguously unfavourable effect on the reproductive performance and nursing behaviour of the does. Based on the preference test, a lower light intensity may be advantageous from the point of view of animal welfare.
Show more Show less

References:

Besenfelder U., Theau-Clément M., Sabbioni E., Castellini C., Renieri T., Havlicek V., Huber T., Wetscher F., Mösslacher G., Brem G. 2004. Effects of different light intensities on quality of spermatozoa in rabbits. World Rabbit Sci., 12: 227-234. doi:10.4995/wrs.2004.570

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). 2005. Scientific Report. The impact of the current housing and husbandry systems on the health and welfare of farmed domestic rabbits. European Food Safety Authority Journal, 267: 1-31.

Gerencsér Zs., Matics Zs., Nagy I., Szendrő Zs. 2011. Effect of light colour and reproductive rhythm on rabbit doe performance. World Rabbit Sci., 19: 161-170. doi:10.4995/wrs.2011.827

Gerencsér Zs., Matics Zs., Nagy I., Biró-Németh E., Radnai I., Szendrő Zs. 2010. The effect of the increased lighting prior to insemination on the rabbit does’ production. (In Hung.) Magy. Állatorv. Lapja, 132: 647-650.

Hoy St., Seitz K., Selzer D., Schüddemage M. 2000. Nursing behaviour of domesticated and wild rabbit does under different keeping conditions. In Proc.: 7th World Rabbit Congress, July 4-7, 2000, Valencia, Spain, 537-543.

Hoy St., Selzer D. 2002. Frequency and time of nursing in wild and domestic rabbits housed outdoors in free range. World Rabbit Sci., 10: 77-84. doi:10.4995/wrs.2002.479

IRRG (International Rabbit Reproduction Group). 2005. Recommendation and guidelines for applied reproduction trials with rabbit does. World Rabbit Sci., 13: 147-164. doi:10.4995/wrs.2005.521

Jilge B., Stähle H. 1984. The internal synchronization of five functions of the rabbit. Chronobiol. Int., 1: 195-204. doi:10.3109/07420528409063896

Lebas F., Coudert P., de Rochambeau H., Thébault R.G. 1997. The Rabbit. Husbandry, health and production. FAO, Anim. Prod. and Health Series, 21.

Matics Zs., Szendrő Zs., Hoy St., Nagy I., Radnai I., Biró-Németh E., Gyovai M. 2004. Effect of different management methods on the nursing behaviour of rabbits. World Rabbit Sci., 12:95-108. doi:10.4995/wrs.2004.578

Matics Zs., Gerencsér Zs., Mikó A., Radnai I., Odermatt M., Nagy I., Szendrő Zs. 2012. Effect of different lighting schedules (16L:8D or 12L:6D) on nursing behaviour of rabbit does. In Proc.: 10th World Rabbit Congress, September 3-6, 2012, Sharm El- Sheikh, Egypt, 1063-1067.

Mirabito L., Galliot P., Souchet C. 1994. Effet de l’utilisation de la PMSG et de la modification de la photopériode sur les performances de reproduction de la lapine. In Proc.: 6èmes Journées Recherche Cunicole, La Rochelle, France, December 6-7, I: 169-178.

Piccione G., Giannetto C., Costa A., Caola G. 2007. Daily rhythms of total activity in rabbits during different light/dark schedules. Trends in Appl. Sci. Res., 2: 360-364. http:10.3923/tasr.2007.360.364

Rebollar P.G., Pérez-Cabal M.A., Pereda N., Lorenzo P.L., AriasÁlvarez M., García-Rebollar P. 2009. Effects of parity order and reproductive management on the efficiency of rabbit productive systems. Livest. Sci. 121: 227-233. http:10.1016/j.livsci.2008.06.018

Schlolaut W. 1998. Das groβe Buch vom Kaninchen. DLG Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.

Seitz K. 1997. Untersuchungen zum Säugeverhalten von Hauskaninchen-Zibben sowie zu Milchhaufnahme, Lebenmasseentwicklung und Verlustgeschehen der Jungtiere. PhD Thesis, Univ. Giessen.

Selzer D. 2000. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zum Verhalten von Wild- und Hauskaninchen unter verschiedenen Haltungsbedingungen. PhD Thesis Univ. Giessen.

Theau-Clément M., Poujardieu B., Bellereaud J. 1990. Influence des traitements lumineux, modes de reproduction et états physiologiques sur la productivité de lapines multipares. In Proc.: 5émes Journées Recherche Cunicole, Paris, France, I, Comm. 7.

Theau-Clément M., Malpaux B., Lamothe E., Milcent N., Juin H., Bodin L. 2008. Influence of photoperiod on the sexual behaviour of non-lactating rabbit does: preliminary results. In Proc.: 9th World Rabbit Congress, Verona, Italy, June 10-13, 2008, 465-469.

Tůma J., Tůmová E., Valášek V. 2010. The effect of season and parity order on fertility of rabbit does and kit growth. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 55: 330-336.

Xiccato G. 1996. Nutrition of lactating does. In Proc.: 6th World Rabbit Congress, July 9-12, 1996, Toulouse, France, 1, 29-47.

Xiccato G., Trocino A., Sartori A., Queaque P.I. 2004. Effect of parity order and litter weaning age on the performance and body energy balance of rabbit does. Livest. Prod. Sci. 239-251. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00125-8

Show more Show less