Milk yield prediction at late lactation in reproductive rabbit does

Alberto Arnau-Bonachera; Concha Cervera; Enrique Blas; Juan José Pascual

doi:10.4995/wrs.2015.3438

Authors

Alberto Arnau-Bonachera Institute for Animal Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València
Concha Cervera Institute for Animal Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València
Enrique Blas Institute for Animal Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València
Juan José Pascual Institute for Animal Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2015.3438

Keywords:

rabbit, milk yield, prediction, energy intake, litter size

Abstract

Separating kits and mother to determine milk yield at 4^th wk of lactation (MY4) could have negative consequences on the training and development of young rabbits. In this work, a total of 313 lactation curves (28 d long), taken from 2 different trials, were used to fit regression models to estimate MY4. In both trials, females were subjected to a semi-intensive reproductive rhythm [insemination at 11 d post-partum (dpp) and weaning at 28 dpp], but diets, genetic types, parity order and day of controls were slightly different. The models included variables which, according to the bibliography, are related to milk yield and are often recorded in joint management (without separation of litters rom mothers), such as litter size at weaning (LSW; both linear and quadratic), joint energy intake of doe plus litter at 4th wk of lactation (JEI; both linear and quadratic), perirenal fat thickness change (ΔPFTd) and milk yield at 3rd wk (MY3). The overlapping degree (OL) between current lactation and next pregnancy was included as a dummy variable, as well as their interactions with quantitative traits. To fit these models, 3 procedures were proposed to obtain accurate equations with biological meaning: Eq1, multiple linear regression (MLR) of data; Eq2, MLR with previous smoothing of sample distribution; and Eq3, MLR with previous smoothing and avoiding redundant samples and collinearities among variables. MY3 had a positive and relevant linear effect on MY4 for the 3 equations obtained (responsible for 39 to 50% of MY4 prediction). JEI had also a relevant role in MY4 prediction (28 to 61%), its positive effect being linear on Eq1, quadratic on Eq2 and both linear and quadratic on Eq3. ΔPFTd and LSW related traits were only included in Eq3, with a low relative weight, and OL inclusion did not improve prediction in any equation. Predicting MY4 was possible with the variables used, although certain precautions must be taken. Traditional MLR seems to predict central values properly, but extreme values poorly, whereas pre-treatment of data to smooth the dependent variable distribution appears to improve prediction of extreme values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Casado C., Piquer O., Cervera C., Pascual J.J. 2006. Modelling the lactation curve of rabbit does: Towards a model including fit suitability and biological interpretation. Livest. Sci., 99: 39–49.

Clarke B., Fokoué E., Zhang H.H. 2009a. Variability, Information and Prediction. In: Principles and Theory for Data Mining and the Machine Learning. Springer New York, New York, USA, 1–43.

Clarke B., Fokoué E., Zhang H.H. 2009b. Variable selection. In: Principles and Theory for Data Mining and the Machine Learning. Springer New York, New York, USA, 569–671.

Cuadras C.M. 2011. Inferencia Multivariante. In: Nuevos Métodos de Análisis Multivariante. CMC Editions, Barcelona, Spain, 67–75.

Estany J., Baselga M., Blasco A., Camacho J. 1989. Mixed model methodology for the estimation of genetic response to selection in litter size of rabbits. Livest. Prod. Sci., 21: 67–75.

Faraldo L., Ródenas L., Martínez-Paredes E. 2013. Variaciones del comportamiento alimentario de conejas y gazapos lactantes según su alojamiento. In: Proc. XXXVIII Symposium de Cunicultura. Zamora, Spain, 127–130.

Fortun-Lamothe L., Gidenne T. 2000. The effects of size of suckled litter on intake behaviour, performance and health status of young and reproducing rabbits. Ann. Zootech., 49: 517–529.

Friggens N.C., Van der Waaij E.H. 2009. Modelling of Resources Allocation Patterns. In: Rauw, W.M. (Ed.), Resources Allocation Theory Applied to Farm Animal Production. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 302–320.

García-Quirós A., Arnau-Bonachera A., Penadés M., Cervera C., Martínez-Paredes E., Ródenas L., Selva L., Viana D., Corpa J.M., Pascual J.J. 2014. A robust rabbit line increases leukocytes counts at weaning and reduces mortality by digestive disorder during fattening. Vet. Immunol. Immunopat. (Accepted).

Gidenne T., Lebas F. 2006. Feeding behaviour in rabbits. In: Bels, V. (Ed.), From Structure to Behaviour. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 179–194.

Lebas F. 1969. Alimentation lactée et croissance pondérale du lapin avant sevrage. Ann. Zootech., 18: 197–208.

Lebas F. 1976. Relations entre la forme de la curbe de lactation maternelle et la croissance des lapereaux. Etude sur 975 courbes individuelles. In: Proc. 1st World Rabbit Congress,. Dijon, France, Communication 9.

Lebas F. 1987. Influence de la taille de la portée et de la production laitière sur la quantité d’aliment ingérée par la lapine allaitante. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 27: 207–208.

Lebas F., Cousin M., Sardi G. 1972. Effet de la simultanéité de la lactation et de la gestation sur les performances laitières chez la lapine. Ann. Zootech., 21: 129–131.

Maertens L., Lebas F., Szendro Z. 2006. Rabbit milk: A review of quantity, quality and non-dietary affecting factors. World Rabbit Sci., 14: 205–230.

Nizza A., Stanco G., Di Meo C., Marongiu M.L., Taranto S., Cutrignelli M.I., Juliano L. 2009. Effect of pre-weaning solid feed and milk intake on caecal content characteristics and performance of rabbits around weaning. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 2: 95–101.

Partridge G.G., Allan S.J. 1982. The effects of different intakes of crude protein on nitrogen utilization in the pregnant and lactating rabbit. Anim. Prod., 35: 145–155.

Pascual J.J. 2010. The role of body condition on new feeding and breeding programmes for reproductive rabbit does. Proc. 22nd Hungarian Conf. Rabbit Prod., 1–21.

Pascual J.J., Cervera C., Blas E., Fernández-Carmona J. 1999. Effect of high fat diets on the performance, milk yield and milk composition of multiparous rabbit does. Anim. Sci., 68: 151–162.

Pascual J.J., Motta W., Cervera C., Quevedo F., Blas E., Fernández-Carmona J. 2002. Effect of dietary energy source on the performance and perirenal fat thickness evolution of primiparous rabbit does. Anim. Sci., 75: 267–279.

Pascual J.J., Cervera C., Blas E., Fernández-Carmona J. 2003. High-energy diets for reproductive rabbit does: effect of energy source. Nutr. Abstr. Rev., 73: 27R–39R.

Pascual J.J., Blanco J., Piquer O., Quevedo F., Cervera C. 2004. Ultrasound measurements of perirenal fat thickness to estimate the body condition of reproducing rabbit does in different physiological states. World Rabbit Sci., 12: 7–21.

Pascual J.J., Savietto D., Cervera C., Baselga M. 2013. Resources allocation in reproductive rabbit does: a review of feeding and genetic strategies for suitable performance. World Rabbit Sci., 21: 123–144.

Quevedo F., Cervera C., Blas E., Baselga M., Pascual J.J. 2006. Long-term effect of selection for litter size and feeding programme on the performance of reproductive rabbit does 2. Lactation and growing period. Anim. Sci., 82: 751–762.

Romero R., Zúnica L.R. 2005. Modelos de regresión. In: Métodos Estadísticos En Ingeniería. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain, 297–334.

Sánchez J.P., Theilgaard P., Mínguez C., Baselga M. 2008. Constitution and evaluation of a long-lived productive rabbit line. J. Anim. Sci., 86: 515–525.

SAS. 2009. User´s Guide (release 9.2). Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

Savietto D., Cervera C., Blas E., Baselga M., Larsen T., Friggens N.C., Pascual J.J. 2013. Environmental sensitivity differs between rabbit lines selected for reproductive intensity and longevity. Animal, 7: 1969–1977.

Savietto D., Cervera C., Ródenas L., Martínez-Paredes E., Baselga M., García-Diego F.J., Larsen T., Friggens N.C., Pascual J.J. 2014. Different resource allocation strategies result from selection for litter size at weaning in rabbit does. Animal, 8: 618-628.

Statgraphics. 2010. STATGRAPHICS® Centurion XVI User Manual. StatPoint Technologies, Inc., USA.

Torres A., Fraga M.J., Blas J.C. de. 1979. Milk production and mortality of New Zealand rabbits. An. del Inst. Nac. Investig. Agrar. Prod. Anim., 25–30.

Wilcox R. 1997. Introduction to the Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. Academic Press: San Diego, 14.

Xiccato G. 1996. Nutrition of lactating does. In: Lebas, F. (Ed.), Proc. 6th World Rabbit Congress, July, 1996. Touluse, France, 29–50.

Zhang P. 1993. Model selection via multifold cross validation. Ann. Stat., 21: 299–313.