Effect of crossbreeding on growth performance, gene expression and Gompertz modelling in meat rabbit under Egyptian environmental conditions

Ghada Abd El-latif

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8859-4293

Egypt

Alexandria University image/svg+xml

Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture

Sarah El-Messeiry

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3115-5625

Egypt

Alexandria University

Department of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture

Alaa El-Raffa

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3830-4295

Egypt

Alexandria University

Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture

Intesar Abu Aliwa

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1373-1940

Egypt

Sabahia, Agriculture Research Centre

Animal Production Research Institute, Sabahia Agriculture Research Centre

Walid Habashy

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2009-5145

Egypt

Damanhour University

Department of Animal and Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture

|

Accepted: 2025-07-22

|

Published: 2025-09-30

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2025.22797
Funding Data

Downloads

Keywords:

Alexandria, growth curve, heterosis, myostatin, V-line, rabbits

Supporting agencies:

This research was not funded

Abstract:

The purpose of this research was to compare the growth performance and gene expression variations in three genetic groups of meat rabbits: Alexandria line (AA), V line (VV) and the cross between Alexandria line males and V line females (AV). For the three genetic groups, which were raised under Egyptian environmental conditions, the studied offspring growth traits were individual weight at weaning (WW, 4 wk) and the end of fattening period (MW, 9 wk) and individual daily weight gain. A total number of 22 bucks, 93 does and 792 kits were used in the study. The Gompertz model was periodically used to examine the rabbits’ growth. Five kits per group were used to collect liver tissue samples at marketing age (63 d) for gene expression analysis. According to the findings, the AV strain had a body weight of 135 g more than the AA strain and 277 g higher than the VV strain. The AV strain also showed a decreased daily feed consumption and a better feed conversion ratio. With strong coefficients of determination (R²=0.86), the Gompertz growth curve successfully approximated the growth curves for all genotypes. Our results also revealed that VV strain had the highest myostatin expression, while AA and cross strains had the lowest. In contrast, there was a statistically significant difference in the growth hormone receptor (GHR) and the growth hormone secretagogue receptor mRNA levels between the VV, AA and AV strains, with the cross strain having the highest levels of GHR mRNA expression. These findings suggest that the AV strain reached maturity earlier than the AA and VV strains, which is beneficial for optimising growth and breeding processes. Furthermore, rabbits’ development, metabolism and general health may be affected by hereditary factors that impact gene expression in liver tissues. To better understand the processes at work and their possible uses in breeding programmes, further study is required.

Show more Show less

References:

Abdel-Hamid T.M. 2015. Crossbreeding parameters for growth traits in a complete three breeds diallel cross design of rabbits in Egypt. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res., 2: 120-127. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2015.b60

Alexander F.L. 2023. Production characteristics and constraints of intensive commercial rabbit meat production in Malta. Doctoral dissertation, University of Malta.

Blasco A., Piles M., Varona L. 2003. A Bayesian analysis of the effect of selection for growth rate on growth curves in rabbits. Genet. Sel. Evol., 35: 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-35-1-21

Brahmantiyo B., Raharjo Y.C., Prasetyo L.H. 2017. Production performance of Hycole, New Zealand White Rabbits and its reciprocal. Indonesian J. Anim. Vet. Sci., 22: 16-23. https://doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v22i1.1590

Brooks A.J., Waters M.J. 2010. The growth hormone receptor: mechanism of activation and clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 6: 515-525. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2010.123.

Dilger A.C., Gabriel S.R., Kutzler L.W., McKeith F.K., Killefer J. 2010. The myostatin null mutation and clenbuterol administration elicit additive effects in mice. Animal, 4: 466-471. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109991297

El-Deghady A.S. 2005. Genetic evaluation for some productive traits in rabbits. Doctoral dissertation, Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Banha University, Egypt.

El-Raffa A.M. 2007. Formation of a rabbit synthetic line (Alexandria line) and primary analysis of its productive and reproductive performance. Egypt Poultry Sci. J., 27: 321-334.

El-Raffa A.M. 2000. Animal model evaluation of V line rabbits raised under Egyptian condition. Litter size traits. Egypt. Poultry. Sci. J., 20: 1003-1016.

Estany J., Baselga M., Blasco A., Camacho J. 1989. Mixed model methodology for the estimation of genetic response to selection in litter size of rabbits. Livest, 21: 67-75.

Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C. 1996 Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th Edition, Addison Wesley Longman, Harlow.

FAO STAT 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at http:// www.fao.org/faostat. Accessed May 2020.

Frank S.J. 2001. Growth hormone signaling and its regulation: preventing too much of a good thing. Growth HormIGF Res. 11: 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-6374(01)80016-2

Goshu A.T., Koya P.R. 2013. Derivation of inflection points off nonlinear regression curves-implications to statistics. Am. J. Theoretical Appl. Stat., 2: 268-272. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20130206.25

Grisolia A.B., D'Angelo G.T., Porto Neto L.R., Siqueira F., Garcia J.F. 2009. Myostatin (GDF8) single nucleotide polymorphisms in Nellore cattle. Genet. Mol. Res. 8: 822-830.

Guo T., Jou W., Chanturiya T., Portas J., Gavrilova O., McPherron A.C. 2009. Myostatin inhibition in muscle, but not adipose tissue, decreases fat mass and improves insulin sensitivity. PLoS ONE, 4: e4937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004937

Hosoda H., Kojima M., Kangawa K. 2006. Biological physiological and pharmacological aspects of ghrelin. J. Pharmacol. Sci.,100: 398-410.

Jin S., Chen S., Li H., Lu Y., Xu G., Yang N. 2014. Associations of polymorphisms in GHRL, GHSR, and IGF1R genes with feed efficiency in chickens. Mol. Biol. Rep., 41: 3973-3979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3265-8

Kambadur R., Sharma M., Smith T.P.L., Bass J.J. 1997. Mutations in myostatin (GDF8) in double-muscled Belgian Blue and Piedmontese cattle. Genome Res., 7: 910-915.https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.7.9.910

Kaya Başar E., Narinç D. 2023. Genetic parameter estimates of growth curve and feed efficiency traits in Japanese quail. Animals, 13: 1765. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13111765

Kohno D., Gao H.Z., Muroya S., Kikuyama S., Yada T. 2003. Ghrelin directly interacts with neuropeptide-Y-containing neurons in the rat arcuate nucleus: Ca2+ signaling via protein kinase A and N-type channel-dependent mechanisms and cross-talk with leptin and orexin. Diabetes. 52: 948-956.

Lee S.J. 2023. Myostatin: a skeletal muscle chalone. Ann. Rev. Physiol., 85: 269-291. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevphysiol-012422-112116

López-Béjar M., Ahuja K. 2014. Effects of myostatin and growth hormone receptor polymorphisms on growth and carcass traits in rabbits. Animal Genet., 45: 579-584. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12180

Lu F.Z., Wang X.X., Pan Q.X., Huang R.H., Liu H.L. 2008. Expression of genes involved in the somatotropic, thyrotropic, and corticotropic axes during development of Langshan and Arbor Acres chickens. Poultry Sci., 87: 2087-2097. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00493

Lv Q., Yuan L., Deng J., Chen M., Wang Y., Zeng J., Li Z., Lai L. 2016. Efficient generation of myostatin gene mutated rabbit by CRISPR/Cas9. Sci. Rep 6: 25029.

Maj D., Bieniek J., Łapa P., Ina S. 2009. The effect of crossing New Zealand White with Californian rabbits on growth and slaughter traits. Arch. Anim. Breed., 52: 205-211.

Makkar H.P., Tran G., Heuzeand V., Ankers P. 2014. State-of-the-art on use of insects as animal feed. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 197: 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008

Murray C.D., Martin N.M., Patterson M., Taylor S.A., Ghatei M.A., Kamm M.A., Johnston C., Bloom S.R., Emmanuel A.V. 2005. Ghrelin enhances gastric emptying in diabetic gastroparesis: a double blind placebo controlled crossover study. Gut, 54: 1693-1698.

Narinç D., Aksoy T., Karaman E. 2010.Genetic parameters of growth curve parameters and weekly body weights in Japanese quails (Coturnixcoturnix japonica). J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 9: 501-507. https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.501.507

Nwakpu P.E., Ogbu C.C., Ugwu S.O.C. 2015. Heterosis of early growth performance in three breeds of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Int. J. Agric. Innov. Res., 3: 1793-1799.

OECD/FAO (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development & Food and Agriculture Organization) 2017. Agricultural Outlook 2017- 2026, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/agr_outlook-2017-en

Piles M., Rafel O., Ramon J., Gómez E.A. 2004. Crossbreeding parameters of some productive traits in meat rabbits. World Rabbit Sci., 12: 139-148. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2004.575

Ptak E., Bieniek J., Jagusiak W. 1994. Comparison of growth curves of purebred and crossbred rabbits. In Proc.: 5th World Congress of Genetic Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP), Guelph, Canada, August 7-12, 1994.

Sariyel V., Aygun A., Keskin I. 2017. Comparison of growth curve models in partridge. Poultry Sci., 96: 1635-1640. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew472

SAS. 2016. SAS Procedure Guide “Version 9.4 Ed”. SAS Institute Inc.

Sun Y., Wang P., Zheng H., Smith R.G. 2004. Ghrelin stimulation of growth hormone release and appetite is mediated through the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.101: 4679-4684

Van Vleck L.D. 1990. Breeding value prediction with maternal genetic groups J. Anim. Sci., 68: 3998-4013. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.68123998x

Weigel K.A., Gianola D., Tempeleman R.J., Matos C.A., Chen I.H.C., Wang T., Bunge R., Lo L.L. 1991. Improving estimates of fixed effects in a mixed linear model. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3174-3182.

Wu G., Siegel B.P., Gilbert R.E, Yang N., Wong A.E. 2011. Expression profiles of somatotropic axis genes in lines of chickens divergently selected for 56-day body weight. Animal Biotechnol., 22: 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2011.566450

Yang X., Deng F., Wu Z., Chen S.Y., Shi Y., Jia X., Hu S., Wang J., Cao W., Lai S.J. 2020. A genome-wide association study identifying genetic variants associated with growth, carcass and meat quality traits in rabbits. Animals (Basel). 20: 1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10061068

Yi Z., Li X., Luo W., Xu Z., Ji C., Zhang Y., Nie Q., Zhang D., Zhang X. 2018. Feed conversion ratio, residual feed intake and cholecystokinin type A receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with feed intake and average daily gain in a Chinese local chicken population. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 9:50 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-018-0261-1

Yin Y., Li Y., Zhang W. 2014. The growth hormone secretagogue receptor: its intracellular signaling and regulation. Inter. J. Mol. Sci., 15: 4837-4855. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15034837

Yin Y., Liu S., Zhang W. 2018. GHSR: Growth hormone secretagogue receptor. In: Choi S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Signaling Molecules. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67199-4_101611

Zhang Y., Jiang J., Kopchick J.J., Frank S.J. 1999. Disulfidelinkage of growth hormone (GH) receptors (GHR) reflectsGH-induced GHR dimerization association of JAK2 withthe GHR is enhanced by receptor dimerization. J. Biolog. Chem., 274: 33072-33084. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.46.33072

Show more Show less