Antimicrobials in a rabbit semen extender: effects on reproduction


  • Charlène Rouillon IMV Technologies
  • Sabine Camugli IMV Technologies
  • Olivier Carion IMV Technologies
  • Arantxa Echegaray Humeco
  • Guy Delhomme IMV Technologies
  • Eric Schmitt IMV Technologies



Rabbit, Semen, Dilution media, Bacterial charges, Motility, Fertility


The use of fluoroquinolone antibiotics was legally restricted by the European Commission in March 2019. Since the extender for rabbit semen Galap® contained this antibiotic, it became necessary to modify it. The purpose of this study was to search for another  molecule, based on its antimicrobial activity and also on the conservation, motility and fertility of semen diluted with the new extender. Several bacterial strains were isolated from 10 poor-quality ejaculates, including Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus spp. They were then tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. Out of 15 antibiotics evaluated, gentamicin was the one targeting such bacteria. In vivo tests were then carried out to assess the effects of this antibiotic change on sperm parameters. Up to 26 pools of good quality semen (total motility >70%) were diluted in original Galap® or in this extender with gentamicin. Ejaculates were analysed on the day (D) of collection and up to 6 d of storage at +17°C. After 24 h storage, the motility in the new extender was reduced by 7.7% compared to the original; this decrease did not worsen by storing. After 6 d of storage, no difference between the two media was detected. A total of 360 females were then inseminated with pools of 4 to 5 good quality semen diluted 1:10 in both extenders, following the routine protocol of rabbit semen processing centres. There was no difference in female fertility or prolificacy between both formulations. In conclusion, these preliminary results suggest that the addition of gentamicin to this extender is useful and also has no adverse effect on fertility or prolificacy.


Download data is not yet available.


Althouse G.C. 2008. Sanitary procedures for the production of extended semen. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 43 Suppl 2: 374-378.

Althouse G.C., Kuster C.E., Clark S.G., Weisiger R.M. 2000. Field investigations of bacterial contaminants and their effects on extended porcine semen. Theriogenology, 53: 1167-1176.

Althouse G.C., Lu K.G. 2005. Bacteriospermia in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology, 63: 573-584.

Althouse G.C., Pierdon M.S., Lu K.G. 2008. Thermotemporal dynamics of contaminant bacteria and antimicrobials in extended porcine semen. Theriogenology, 70: 1317-1323.

Aurich C., Spergser J. 2007. Influence of bacteria and gentamycin on cooled-stored stallion spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 67: 912-918.

Berendsen B., Elbers I., Stolker L. 2011. The stability of antibiotics in matrix and reference solutions determined using a straight-forward procedure applying mass spectrometric detection. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess., 28: 1657-1666.

Bresciani C., Cabassi C.S., Morini G., Taddei S., Bettini R., Bigliardi E., Ianni F.D., Sabbioni A., Parmigiani E. 2014. Boar Semen Bacterial Contamination in Italy and Antibiotic Efficacy in a Modified Extender. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 13: 3082.

Brun J.M., Theau-Clément M., Bolet G. 2002. The relationship between rabbit semen characteristics and reproductive performance after artificial insemination. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 70: 139-149.

Bussalleu E., Yeste M., Sepúlveda L., Torner E., Pinart E., Bonet S. 2011. Effects of different concentrations of enterotoxigenic and verotoxigenic E. coli on boar sperm quality. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 127: 176-182.

Daniel N., Renard J.P. 2010. Artificial Insemination in Rabbits. Cold Spring Harb Protoc.,

Duracka M., Lukac N., Kacaniova M., Kantor A., Hleba L., Ondruska L., Tvrda E. 2019. Antibiotics versus Natural Biomolecules: The Case of in vitro Induced Bacteriospermia by Enterococcus faecalis in Rabbit Semen. Molecules 24: 4329.

Francisco E.M. 2018. Fluoroquinolone and quinolone antibiotics: PRAC recommends new restrictions on use following review of disabling potentially long-lasting side effects. Available at: Accessed December 2020.

Fraczek M., Kurpisz M. 2015. Mechanisms of the harmful effects of bacterial semen infection on ejaculated human spermatozoa: potential inflammatory markers in semen. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 53: 201-217.

Gadea J. 2003. Semen extenders used in the artificial insemination of swine: Review. Span. J. Agric. Res. 17-28.

Gloria A., Contri A., Wegher L., Vignola G., Dellamaria D., Carluccio A. 2014. The effects of antibiotic additions to extenders on fresh and frozen-thawed bull semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 150: 15-23.

Holtz W., Foote, R.H. 1978. Composition of rabbit semen and the origin of several constituents. Biol. Reprod., 18: 286-292.

Hudzicki J. 2009. Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 23 pp.

International Rabbit Reproduction Group (IRRG). 2005. Recommendations and guidelines for applied reproduction trials with rabbit does. World Rabbit Sci., 13: 147-164.

Jarvis S., Day J.E.L., Reed B. 2005. BSAS Ethical Policy British Society of Animal Science Ethical guidelines for research in animal science. In Proc. of the British Society of Animal Science, 247-253.

Koppers A.J., De Iuliis G.N., Finnie J.M., McLaughlin E.A., Aitken R.J. 2008. Significance of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in the generation of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. J. Clin. Endocrino. Metabo., 93: 3199-3207.

Lavara R., Mocé E., Lavara F., Viudes de Castro M.P., Vicente J.S. 2005. Do parameters of seminal quality correlate with the results of on-farm inseminations in rabbits? Theriogenology, 64: 1130-1141.

Lebas F., Coudert P., De Rochambeau H. 1997. The Rabbit: husbandry, health, and production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.

Maes D., Nauwynck H., Rijsselaere T., Mateusen B., Vyt P., de Kruif A., Van Soom A. 2008. Diseases in swine transmitted by artificial insemination: an overview. Theriogenology, 70: 1337-1345.

Maroto Martín L.O., Muñoz E., De Cupere F., Van Driessche E., Echemendia-Blanco D., Rodríguez J., Beeckmans S. 2010. Bacterial contamination of boar semen affects the litter size. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 120: 95-104.

Mercier P., Rideaud P. 1990. Bactériologie du sperme frais de lapin - Etude préliminaire. INRAE Productions Animales 3: 215-221.

Morrell J., Wallgren M. 2014. Alternatives to Antibiotics in Semen Extenders: A Review. Pathogens, 3: 934-946.

R Development Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

Theau-Clément M., Ailloud E., Sanchez A., Saleil G., Brun J.M. 2016. Relationships between rabbit semen characteristics and fertilising ability after insemination. Animal, 10: 426-431.

Waberski D., Luther A.M., Grünther B., Jäkel H., Henning H., Vogel C., Peralta W., Weitze K.F. 2019. Sperm function in vitro and fertility after antibiotic-free, hypothermic storage of liquid preserved boar semen. Sci. Rep., 9: 1-10.