Cage-enrichment: rabbit does prefer straw or a compressed wooden block
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2014.1353Keywords:
animal welfare, rabbits, enrichment materials, behaviourAbstract
The effect of different food related materials on the behaviour of commercial meat rabbit does was investigated to provide them enrichment. Five different treatments were tested. Control (pens without additional enrichment, C) was compared with pens containing a pinewood stick (Pine), straw in a plastic bin (Straw), a compressed wooden block (Ply) or a combination of straw and a pinewood stick (Straw+Pine). The experiment was conducted on a commercial rabbit farm using 80 cages with multiparous lactating hybrid (Hycole) rabbit does. Behavioural observations were conducted in the first 4 wk of 2 successive lactations of 6 wk each, twice a week from 15:00 to 18:30 h. Once every week the consumption of gnawing materials and soiling of the cages was scored. More does were significantly occupied with Straw and Ply than with Pine (24±20, 11±9 and 4±3% of does, respectively) for a longer duration (4±4, 2±2, 0.1±0.2% of observed time, respectively). In does of Straw+Pine group, the pinewood was barely touched and straw was preferred. It can be concluded that straw (loose material) and wooden block are used by the animals as enrichment material to gnaw or chew on. The materials remain attractive for the 2 lactations which were measured. The pinewood stick as provided in this study was rarely used and it may be questioned whether it is sufficient as enrichment material or if it should be provided in another way than hanging on the roof of the cage. This study provides a first step towards a positive list of enrichment materials that can be used in commercial rabbit farming in The Netherlands.
Downloads
References
Baumans V. 2005. Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents and rabbits: requirements of rodents, rabbits, and research. ILAR J., 46: 162-170. doi:10.1093/ilar.46.2.162
Berthelsen H., Hansen L.T. 1999. The effect of hay on the behaviour of cages rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Anim. Welfare, 8: 149-157.
Boiti C., Monaci M., Stradaioli G., Verini Supplizi A., Vacca C., Castellini C., Facchin E. 1996. Effect of postpartum progesterone levels on receptivity, ovarian response, embryo quality and development in rabbits. In Proc.: of the 6th World Rabbit Congress, July 9-12, 1996, Toulouse, France. 2: 45-49.
Brooks D.L., Huls W., Leamon C., Thomson J., Parker J., Twomey S. 1993. Cage enrichment for female New Zealand White rabbits. Lab. Animal, 22: 30-35.
Brown C. 2009. Novel food items as environmental enrichment for rodents and rabbits. Lab. Animal, 38: 119-120. doi:10.1038/laban0409-119
Gun D., Morton D.B. 1995. Inventory of the behaviour of New Zealand White rabbits in laboratory cages. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 45: 277-292. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(95)00627-5
Harris L.D., Lewis B., Burge J.R., Ruble G.R. 2001. Evaluation of objects and food for environmental enrichment of NZW rabbits. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim., 40: 27-30.
Hoy S. 2006. Nursing behaviour of wild and domestic rabbits. In: Maertens and Coudert (eds), Recent advances in rabbit science. pp. 75-77.
Huls W.L., Brooks D.L., Bean-Knudsen D. 1991. Response of adult New Zealand White rabbits to enrichment objects and paired housing. Lab. Anim. Sci., 41: 609-612.
Johnson C.A., Pallozzi W.A., Geiger L., Szumiloski J.L., Castiglia L., Dahl N.P., Destefano J.A., Pratt S.J., Hall S.J., Beare C.M., Gallagher M., Klein H.J. 2003. The effect of an environmental enrichment device on individually caged rabbits housed in a safety assessment facility. Lab. Anim. Sci., 42:27-30.
Jilge B. 1995. The ontogeny of the rabbit’s circadian rhythms without an external zeitgeber. Physiol. Behav., 58: 131-140. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(95)00006-5
Leslie T., Dalton L., Phillips C.J.C. 2004. Preference of domestic rabbits for grass or coarse mix feeds. Anim. Welfare 13: 57-62.
Lidfors L. 1997. Behavioural effects of environmental enrichment for individually caged rabbits. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 52:157-169. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01141-0
Lokley R.M. 1961. Social; structure and stress in the rabbit warren. J. Anim. Ecol., 30, 2: 385-423. doi:10.2307/2305
López S.M., Gómez A.C. 2004. The use of entertainment objects in rabbit cages. Preliminary evaluation. World Rabbit Sci., 11: 173. doi:10.4995/wrs.2003.506
López M., Carilho M.C., Gómez C. 2004. Evaluation of the use of straw as an entertainment in Gigante de España rabbit: the effect of the placing of the straw in cage on the behaviour. In Proc.: 8th World Rabbit Congress, September 7-10, 2004, Puebla, Mexico. pp. 1241-1246.
Love J.A. 1994. Group-housing: meeting the physical and social needs of the laboratory rabbit. Lab. Anim. Sci. 44: 5-11.
Maertens L., Van Oeckel M.J. 2001. Effect du logement en cage ou en parc et de son enrichissement sur les performances et la couleur de la viande des lapins. In Proc.: 9ème Journée Recherche Cunicole, Paris, France pp. 31-34.
Maertens L., Buijs S., Davoust C. 2013. Gnawing blocks as cage enrichment and dietary supplement for does and fatteners: intake, performance and behaviour. World Rabbit Sci., 21: 185-192. doi:10.4995/wrs.2013.1195
Poggiagliolmi S., Crowell-Davis S.L., Alworth L.C., Harvey S.B. 2011. Envrironmental enrichment of New Zealand White rabbits living in laboratory cages. J. Vet. Behav., 6: 343-350. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2010.12.001
Pol C., Rommers J.M., Jong de I.C., Ekkel D. 2006. De behoefte, motivatie en voorkeur van voedsters voor ruwvoer in de reproductiecyclys. N.O.K.-kontaktblad 24: 5-14.
Princz Z., Orova Z., Nagy I., Jordan D., Stuhec I., Luzi F., Verga M., Szendrő Sz. 2007. Application of gnawing sticks in rabbit housing. World Rabbit Sci., 15: 29-36. doi:10.4995/wrs.2007.607
Princz Z., Dalle Zotte A., Radnai I., Biró-Németh E., Matics Sz., Gerencsér Zs., Nagy I., Szendrő Sz. 2008a. Behaviour of growing rabbits under various housing conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 111: 342-356. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2007.06.013
Princz Z., Nagy I., Biró-Németh E., Matics Sz., Szendrő Sz. 2008b. Effect of gnawing sticks on the welfare of growing rabbits. In Proc.: 9th World Rabbit Congress, June 10-13, 2008, Verona, Italy. pp. 1221-1224
Princz Z., Dalle Zotte A., Metzger Sz., Radnai I., Biró-Németh E., Orova Z., Szendrő Sz. 2009. Response of fattening rabbits reared under different housing conditions. 1. Live performance and health status. Livest. Sci., 121: 86-91. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2008.05.018
Stauffacher M. 1992. Group-housing and enrichment cages for breeding, fattening and laboratory rabbits. Anim. Welfare 1: 105-125
Theau-Clément M., Boiti C., Bonanno A., Eiben E., Maertens L., Szendrő Sz. 2006. Alternative methods for the synchronisation of oestrus in lactating does. In: Maertens and Coudert (eds.) Recent advances in rabbit science. Plot-it bvba Merelbeke, Belgium. pp. 21-37.
Zucca D, Marelli S.P., Redaelli V., Heinzl E., Cardile H., Ricci C., Verga M., Luzi F. 2012. Effect of environmental enrichment and group size on behaviour and live weight in growing rabbits. World Rabbit Sci., 20: 89-95 doi:10.4995/wrs.2012.1082
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal is licensed under a "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)".
