A study of growth and some blood parameters in Czech rabbits

Authors

  • Eva Tůmová Czech University of Life Sciences
  • Miloslav Martinec Czech University of Life Sciences
  • Zdenek Volek Institute of Animal Science
  • Helena Härtlová Czech University of Life Sciences
  • Darina Chodová Czech University of Life Sciences
  • Zuzana Bízková Czech University of Life Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2013.1320

Keywords:

rabbit, genetic resources, population size, growth performance

Abstract

The aims of this study were to describe selected performance characteristics of Czech local breeds and to compare these breeds with a commercial hybrid. Seven original Czech breeds were included in the study: the giant breed Moravian Blue (MB), the medium breeds Czech White (CW), Czech Spotted (CS), Czech Solver (CSo), Moravian White of Brown Eye (MW) and the small breeds Czech Black Guard Hair (CB) and Czech Gold (CG) and the Hyplus rabbits. Growth of the rabbits was significantly (P=0.001) affected by genotype; MB and CW breeds grew non-significantly faster than Hyplus. The highest daily weight gain was observed in MB (42.6 g/d) and the lowest was in CB (23.9 g/d). Digestibility of ether extract was significantly (P=0.001) affected by genotype, with the lowest value for MB (0.823). Slaughter characteristics mostly correlated with live weight; the highest dressing-out percentage was in the small breed CG (62.0%) and the lowest in the Hyplus rabbit (57.0%). Of the biochemical traits evaluated, only cholesterol concentration was significantly (P=0.041) affected by genotype, with the highest values observed in Hyplus rabbits (4.2 mmol/L).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Eva Tůmová, Czech University of Life Sciences

Department of Animal Husbandry

Miloslav Martinec, Czech University of Life Sciences

Department of Animal Husbandry

Helena Härtlová, Czech University of Life Sciences

Department of Veterinary Science

Darina Chodová, Czech University of Life Sciences

Department of Animal Husbandry

Zuzana Bízková, Czech University of Life Sciences

Department of Animal Husbandry

References

Abdel-Azeem A.S., Abdel-Azim A.M., Darwish A.A., Omar E.M. 2010. Haematological and biochemical observations in four pure breeds of rabbit and their crosses under Egyptian environmental conditions. World Rabbit Sci., 18: 103-110.

doi:10.4995/WRS.2010.18.13

AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th Ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Arlington, VA, USA.

AOAC International. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th Ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Washington, DC, USA.

AOAC International. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th Ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Maryland, USA.

Bianospino E., Wechsler F.S., Fernandes S., Roça R.O., Moura A.S.A.M.T. 2006. Growth, carcass and meat quality traits of straightbred and crossbred Botucatu rabbits. World Rabbit Sci., 14: 237-246. doi:10.4995/wrs.2006.563

Blasco A., Ouhayoun J. 1996. Harmonization of criteria and terminology in rabbit meat research. Revised proposal. World Rabbit Sci., 4: 93-99. doi:10.4995/wrs.1996.278

Bolet G., Brun J.M., Monnerot M., Abeni F., Arnal C., Arnold J., Bell D., Bergoglio G., Besenfelder U., Bosze S., Boucher S., Chanteloup N., Ducourouble M.C., Durand-Tardif M., Esteves P.J., Ferrand N., Haas C., Hewitt G., Jehl N., Joly T., Koehl P.F., Laube T., Lechevestrier S., López M., Masoero G., Menigoz

J.J., Piccinin R., Querney G., Vicente J.S., Saleil G., Surridge A., van der Loo W., Virag J.S., Viudes de Castro M.P., Virag J.S., Zimmermann J.M. 2000. Evaluation and utilisation of European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) genetic resources. First results and inferensces. In Proc.: 7th World Rabbit Congress, 4-7 July, 2000, Valencia, Spain, Vol 2: 1-32.

Cazabon E.P.I., Rastogi R.K., Laukner F.B., Ali B.A. 2000. Some haematological values in rabbits from subtropical Trinidad, West Indies. World Rabbit Sci., 8: 63-65. doi:10.4995/wrs.2000.420

Dalle Zotte A. 2002. Perception of rabbit meat quality and major factors influencing the rabbit carcass and meat quality. Livest. Prod. Sci., 75: 11-32. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00308-6

Fortun-Lamothe L., Combes S., Gidenne T. 2009. Contribution of intensive rabbit breeding to sustainable development. A semiquantitative

analysis of the production in France. World Rabbit Sci., 17: 79-85. doi:10.4995/wrs.2009.661

Hernández P., Ariño B., Grimal A., Blasco A. 2006. Comparison of carcass and meat characteristics of three rabbit lines selected for litter size or growth rate. Meat Sci., 73: 645-650. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.007

Kerdiles V., de Rochambeau H. 2002. A genetic description of two selected strains of rabbits. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 119: 25-33.

doi:10.1046/j.1439-0388.2002.00315.x

Khalil, M.H. 1993. Descriptive model for rabbit genetic resources data bank. World Rabbit Sci., 1: 113-118. doi:10.4995/wrs.1993.203

Martinec M., Härtlová H., Chodová D., Tůmová E., Fučíková A. 2012. Selected haematological and biochemical indicators in different breeds of rabbits. Acta Vet. Brno, 81: 371-375. doi:10.2754/avb201281040371

Mertens D.R. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fibre in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. J. AOAC Int., 85: 1217-1240.

Metzger Sz., Odermatt M., Szendrő Zs., Mohaupt M., Romvári R., Makai A., Biró-Németh E., Sipos L., Radnai I., Horn P. 2006. A study of the carcass traits of different rabbit genotypes. World Rabbit Sci., 14: 107-114. doi:10.4995/wrs.2006.550

Metzger Sz., Odermatt M., Szendrő Zs., Mohaupt M., Romvári R., Makai A., Biró-Németh E., Radnai I., Sipos L. 2004. Comparison of carcass traits and meat quality of Hyplus hybrid, purebred Pannon White rabbits and their crossbreeds. In Proc.: 8th World Rabbit Congress, 7-10 September, 2004, Puebla City, Mexico, 1422-1428.

Ouyed A., Rivest J., Brun J.M. 2011. Heterosis, direct and maternal additive effects on rabbit growth and carcass traits from a Canadian experiment. World Rabbit Sci. 19: 31-41. doi:10.4995/wrs.2011.783

Paci G., Cecchi F., Preziuso G., Ciampolini R., D`Agata M. 2012. Carcass traits and meat quality of two different rabbit genotypes. Italian J. Anim. Sci., 11: 249-252. doi:10.4081/ijas.2012.e45

Pérez, J.M., Lebas F., Gidenne T., Maertens L., Xiccato G., Parigi- Bini R., Dalle Zotte A., Cossu M.E., Carazzolo A., Villamide M. J., Carabaño R., Fraga M.J., Ramos M.A., Cervera C., Blas E., Fernández J., Falcao e Cunha L., Bengala Freire J. 1995. European reference method for in vivo determination of diet digestibility in rabbits. World Rabbit Sci., 3: 41-43. doi:10.4995/wrs.1995.239

Pla M., Hernández P., Blasco A. 1996. Carcass composition and meat characteristics of two rabbit breeds of different degrees of maturity. Meat Sci., 44: 85-92. doi:10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00079-4

SAS Institute Inc. 2003. The SAS System for Windows. Release 9.1.3. Cary, NC, USA.

Scherf B.D. 2000. World Watch List for domestic animal diversity. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 3rd edition.

Szendrő Z., Matics Z., Gerencsér Z., Nagy I., Lengyel M., Horn P., Dalle Zotte A. 2010. Effect of dam and sire genotypes on productive and carcass traits of rabbits. J. Anim. Sci., 88:533-543. doi:10.2527/jas.2009-2045

Tůmová E., Martinec M., Chodová D. 2011. Analysis of Czech rabbit genetic resources. Sci. Agric. Bohem., 42: 113-118.

Tůmová E., Skřivanová V., Skřivan M., Marounek M., LaštovkováJ., Kuboušková M., Knížek J. 1996. The effect of genotype on the growth, digestibility of nutrients and meat quality of broiler rabbits. Sci. Agric. Bohem., 27: 39-48.

Taylor C.S. 1985. Use of genetic size-scaling in evaluation of animal growth. J. Anim. Sci., 61: 118-143.

Van Soest P.J., Wine, R.H. 1967. Use detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. 4. Determination of plant cell wall constituent. J. AOAC Int., 50: 50-55.

Wolf P., Zumbrock B., Kamphues J. 2010. Breed dependent influences on relative size of intestinal tract as well as composition of its chyme in rabbits. Zuchtungskunde, 82: 165-175.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-26

Issue

Section

Papers