Gnawing blocks as cage enrichment and dietary supplement for does and fatteners: intake, performance and behaviour

Authors

  • Luc Maertens Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO)
  • Stephanie Buijs Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO)
  • Chantal Davoust INZO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2013.1195

Keywords:

gnawing blocks, feed supplement, does, fatteners, intake, behaviour

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate different experimental gnawing blocks as cage enrichment in rabbits. One hundred and five pregnant rabbit does housed in conventional wire cages were distributed according to their parity number in 4 homogenous treatment groups. Throughout one complete reproductive cycle (from day 18 of pregnancy till weaning of the litter), does either received no enrichment (controls) or a gnawing block hung from a wire on the cage wall. The 3 different blocks had the same basal components (wheat, molasses and oligoelements), but additionally wood mash (WM), wood mash+chicory pulp (ChP) or wood mash and inulin syrup (I) were respectively incorporated. After weaning, each litter continued to receive the same blocks as before and block consumption was measured as well as the performance of the fatteners. Weight development during the lactation was comparable except in does that received the wood powder blocks. These females had a significantly lower weight (P<0.05) at different time points compared to controls. Litter weight or kit weight was not significantly different at any of the time points measured, but again the treatment with wood powder blocks presented the lowest weight. The consumption of blocks during the whole reproduction cycle (42 d) was 11.0±1.1; 6.8±1.0 and 4.4±0.7 g/d per cage for wood mash, chicory pulp or inulin enriched blocks, respectively. A very high variability in consumption of blocks was observed between females. This varied between 1 and 5 (I or ChP group) or even 1 and 9 blocks (WM group) per reproductive cycle. In fatteners, daily block consumption was significantly different (P<0.05) and reached on average 7.0±0.5; 3.9±0.5 and 2.2±0.2 g/d per fattener, respectively for WM, ChP and I. Five females with a block and 5 females without a block were observed for 1 h 3 d before the expected parturition and at 2 time points during lactation. Distinction was made between 15 different behaviours. Although the presence of a block did not significantly increase the total number of behavioural transitions, locomotion and intake behaviour were significantly (P<0.05) increased when a gnawing block was available. The observation period influenced the frequency of many behavioural transitions and before parturition was significantly higher than post parturition, respectively 56.1±11.1 vs. 13.7±3.8 (Week 1, P<0.01) and 25.1±5.5 (Week 2, P<0.01). However, a very large variability was observed between does and, moreover, some does were mostly inactive after parturition during the observation period. Based on the consumption pattern and behaviour, these gnawing blocks could be considered as cage enrichment and those with the chicory pulp best fulfilled the objective of a suitable gnawing material.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luc Maertens, Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO)

Animal Sciences Unit

Stephanie Buijs, Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO)

Animal Sciences Unit

References

Bailoni L., Schiavon S., Pagnin G., Tagliapietra F., Bonsembiante M. 2005. Quanti-qualitative evaluation of pectins in the dietary fibre of 24 foods. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 4: 49-58.

Baumans V. 2005. Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents and rabbits: requirements of rodents, rabbits and research. ILAR J., 46: 162-170. doi:10.1093/ilar.46.2.162

Buijs S., Keeling L.J., Tuyttens F.A.M. 2011. Behaviour and use of space in fattening rabbits as influenced by cage size and enrichment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 134: 229-238. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2011.06.008

Dal Bosco A., Castellini C., Mugnai C. 2002. Rearing rabbits on a wire net floor or straw litter: behaviour, growth and meat qualitative traits. Livest. Prod. Sci. 75: 149-156. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00307-4

Gidenne T. 2003. Fibres in rabbit feeding for digestive troubles prevention: respective role of low-digested and digestible fibre. Livest. Prod. Sci. 81: 105-117. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00301-9

Gómez-Conde M.S., García J., Chamorro S., Eiras P., Rebollar P.G., Pérez de Rozas A., Badiola I., De Blas C., Carabaño R., 2007. Neutral detergent-soluble fiber improves gut barrier function in twenty-five-day-old weaned rabbits. J. Anim. Sci. 85: 3313-3321. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-777

Jordan D., Luzi F., Verga M., Štuhec I. 2006. Environmental enrichment in growing rabbits. In: L. Maertens. P. Coudert (Eds.). Recent advances in rabbit sciences. COST–ILVO publication. Merelbeke, Belgium, pp. 113-119.

Lang C., Hoy S. 2011. Investigations on the use of an elevated platform in group cages by growing rabbits. World Rabbit Sci., 19: 95-101. doi:10.4995/wrs.2011.800

Lidfors L. 1997. Behavioural effects of environmental enrichment for individually caged rabbits. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 52: 157-169.

doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01141-0

Maertens L. 1992. Selection scheme, performance level and comparative test of two lines of meat rabbits. In Proc.: 5th World Rabbit Congress, July 25-30, 1992, Oregon, USA. J.Appl. Rabbit Res., 15: 206-212.

Maertens L., Perez J.M., Villamide M., Cervera C., Gidenne T., Xiccato G. 2002. Nutritive value of raw materials for rabbits: EGRAN tables 2002. World Rabbit Sci., 10: 157-166. doi:10.4995/wrs.2002.488

Maertens L., Lebas F., Szendrő Zs. 2006. Rabbit milk: A review of quantity, quality and non-dietary affecting factors. World Rabbit Sci., 14: 205-230. doi:10.4995/wrs.2006.565

Mirabito L. 2003. Logement et bien-être du lapin: les nouveaux enjeux. In Proc.: 10èmes Journées Recherche Cunicole. Paris. France, pp.163-172.

Princz Z., Orova Z., Nagy I., Jordan D., Štuhec I., Luzi F., Verga M., Szendrő Zs. 2007. Application of gnawing sticks in rabbit housing. World Rabbit Sci., 15: 29-36. doi:10.4995/wrs.2007.607

Socode. 2008. http://www.socode-warcoing.be Accessed: May 2011.

StatSoft. 2010. Statistica 10 release. Tulsa, Ok., USA.

Trocino A., Xiccato G. 2006. Animal welfare in reared rabbits: A review with emphasis on housing systems. World Rabbit Sci. 14: 77-93. doi:10.4995/wrs.2006.553

Verga M., Zingarelli I., Heinzl E., Ferrante V., Martiono P.A., Luzi F. 2004. Effect of housing and environmental enrichment on performance and behaviour in fattening rabbits. In Proc.:8th World Rabbit Congress. September 7-10, 2004, Puebla, Mexico, pp. 1283-1288.

Verga M., Luzi F., Carenzi C. 2007. Effects of husbandry and management systems on physiology and behaviour of farmed and laboratory rabbits. Horm. Behav., 52: 122-129. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.03.024

Volek Z., Marounek M., Skřivanová V. 2007. Effect of a starter diet supplementation with mannan-oligosaccharide or inulin on health status, caecal metabolism, digestibility of nutrients and growth of early weaned rabbits. Animal. 1: 523-530. doi:10.1017/S1751731107685012

Volek Z., Marounek M. 2011. Dried chicory root (Cichorium intybus L.) as a natural fructan source in rabbit diet: effects on growth performance, digestion and caecal and carcass traits. World Rabbit Sci., 19: 143-150. doi:10.4995/wrs.2011.850

Zerroucki N., Lebas F., Davoust C., Corrent E. 2008. Effect of mineral blocks addition on fattening rabbit performance. In Proc.: 9th World Rabbit Congress, June 10-13, 2008, Verona, Italy, pp. 853-857.

Downloads

Published

2013-09-27

Issue

Section

Papers