Effect of handling in pre-weaning rabbits

Authors

  • Daniela Zucca Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria
  • Veronica Redaelli Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria
  • S.P. Marelli Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria
  • Vittorio Bonazza Distretto Veterinario di Romano di Lombardia
  • Eugenio Heinzl Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria
  • Marina Verga Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria
  • Fabio Luzi Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2012.1083

Keywords:

Kits, handling, body weight, behavioural test, fear, rabbit

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of regular daily handling on weight gain and on the fear reaction towards a new environment and human beings in domestic kits (Tonic Immobility test: TI, Emergence test: ET). Two groups in the same environment and fed the same diet were analysed: handled group and control (17 litters, 9 kits/litter per group). No differences in weight gain were recorded. During ET at 33 days of age, handled kits took less time to enter the arena than control group kits. TI duration was shorter in handled kits, which required more inductions than the control group. It was found that minimal human contact imposed before nursing reduced the fear of humans in rabbit kits. Our handling method requires minimal contact and can be used to reduce fear and improve welfare in rabbits. Moreover, the short length of the handling procedure allows stockpersons to produce tamer rabbits, reducing stress levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Daniela Zucca, Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria

Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria

Veronica Redaelli, Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria

Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria

S.P. Marelli, Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria

Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria

Eugenio Heinzl, Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria

Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria

Marina Verga, Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria

Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria

Fabio Luzi, Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria

Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Sezione di Zootecnica Veterinaria

References

Anderson C.O., Denenberg V.H., Zarrow M.X. 1972. Effects of handling and social isolation upon the rabbit's behavior. Behavior, 43: 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853973X00526

Bilkó Á., Altbäcker V., Hudson, R. 1994. Transmission of food preference in the rabbit: the means of information transfer. Physiol. Behav., 56: 907-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(94)90322-0

Bilkó Á., Altbäcker V. 2000. Regular handling early in nursing period eliminates fear response toward human beings in wild and domestic rabbits. Dev. Psychobiol., 36: 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(200001)36:1<78::AID-DEV8>3.3.CO;2-X

Boivin X., Le Neindre P., Garel J.P., Chupin J.M. 1994. Influence of breed and rearing management on cattle reactions during human handling. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 39: 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90131-7

Csatádi K., Kustos K., Eiben Cs., Bilkó Á., Altbäcker V. 2005. Even minimal human contact linked to nursing reduces fear responses toward humans in rabbits. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 95: 123-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.05.002

Ferrante V., Marelli S., Pignattelli P., Baroli B., Cavalchini L.G. 2005. Performance and reactivity in three Italian chicken breeds for organic production. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 23, 1: 223-229.

Gallup G.G. Jr., 1977. Tonic immobility: the role of fear and predation. Psychol. Rec., 27: 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394432

Grigor P.N., Hughes B.O., Aplleby M. C., 1995. Effects of regular handling and exposure to an outside area on subsequent fearfulness and dispersal in domestic hens. Anim. Behav., 44: 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00576-E

Hansen I., Braastad B.O., Storbraten J., Tofastrud M. 1993. Differences in fearfulness indicated by tonic immobility between laying hens in aviaries and in cages. Anim. Welfare, 2: 105-112.

Hemsworth P.H., Barnett J.L. 1991. The effects of aversively handling pigs, either individually or in groups, on their behaviour, growth and corticosteroids. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 30: 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(91)90085-C

Hudson R., Schaal B., Bilkó Á., Altbäcker V. 1996. Just three minutes a day: The behaviour of young rabbits viewed in the context of limited maternal care. In Proc: 6th World Rabbit Congr., Toulouse, France, 2: 395-403.

Kersten A.M.P., Meijsser F.M., Metz J.H.M. 1989. Effect of early handling on later open-field behaviour of rabbits. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 24: 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(89)90043-9

Jezierski T.A., Konecka A.M. 1996. Handling and rearing results in young rabbits. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 46: 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00653-2

Jones R.B. 1986a. Conspecific, vocalization, tonic immobility and fearfulness in the domestic fowl. Behav. Process., 13: 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(86)90085-9

Jones R.B. 1986b. The tonic immobility reaction of the domestic fowl: a review. World's Poult. Sci. J., 42: 82-96. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19860008

Jones R.B., Faure J.M. 1981. The effect of regular handling on growth in male and female chicks of broiler and layer strains. Brit. Poul. Sci., 22: 461-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071688108447910

Mateo J.M., Estep D.Q., McCann J.S. 1991. Effects of differential handling on the behaviour of domestic ewes (Ovis aries). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 32: 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80162-5

Miller K.A., Garner J.P., Mench J.A. 2005. The test-retest reliability of four behavioural tests of fearfulness for quail: a critical evaluation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 92: 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.10.016

Pongrácz P., Altbäcker V. 1999. The effect of early handling is dependent upon the state of the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) pups around nursing. Dev. Psychobiol., 35: 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199911)35:3<241::AID-DEV8>3.0.CO;2-R

Pongrácz P., Altbäcker V. 2003. Arousal but not nursing is necessary to elicit a decreased fear reaction toward humans in rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) pups. Dev. Psychobiol., 43: 192-199. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.10132

Price E.O. 1984. Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. Q. Rev. Biol., 59: 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1086/413673

Ratner S.C. 1967. Comparative aspects of hypnosis. In: Gordon J.E. (Ed.). Handbook of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, Macmillan, New York, 550-587.

Rushen J., Taylor A.A., de Passilé A.M. 1999. Domestic animals' fear of humans and its effect on their welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 65: 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00089-1

SAS Institute, 2008. SAS® User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

Tanida H., Miura A., Tanaka T., Yoshimoto T. 1994. The role of handling in communication between humans and weanling pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 40: 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90063-9

Verga M., Castrovilli C., Ferrante V., Grilli G., Heinzl E., Luzi F., Toschi I. 2004. Effetti della manipolazione e dell'arricchimento ambientale su indicatori integrati di "benessere" nel coniglio. Coniglicoltura, 41(2): 26-35.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Papers