Design and comfort in office space
The theme of office space is of particular interest because it is a sector strongly involved by technological development. The high concentration of plant engineering systems makes it essential to the attention to environmental parameters and to research on the quality of the relationship which binds man to artificial dimension of built space. In the design of office spaces, the general objective must be to be able to achieve a new working environment relationship. A ratio in which optimal balance is always sought in terms of igrothermal, acoustic and luminous comfort conditions, without noting that the psychological and sociological component plays an important role among the environmental factors, and this significantly interferes with the conditions of physiological comfort. The following work is an essay on the subject.
Baron R.A., Rea M.S., Daniels S.G. Effects of indoor lighting (illuminance and spectral distribution) on the performance of cognitive tasks and interpersonal behavior, The potential mediating role of positive affects. Motivation and Emotion, 16:1, Springer New York, USA. 1992.
Carver C. S. Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA. 1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5887-2
Canazei M., Dehoff P., Staggl S. e Pohl W. Effects of dynamic ambient lighting on female permanent morning shift workers, Lighting Research & Technology, vol 46, iusse 2, pp. 140-156. 2014.
Ebermaier C. Saggio storico della luce in riguardo alla sua influenza sulla complessa natura e particolarmente sul corpo umano oltre alla visione, Giustino Pasquali, Venezia. 1805.
Galasiu, A. D. and J. A. Veitch. Occupant Preferences and Satisfaction with the Luminous Environment and Control Systems in Daylit Offices: Energy and Buildings. 38: 728–742. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.001
Lepore M. Evoluzione dello spazio ufficio nell’era della “information technology”, Aracne, Roma. 2004.
Origlia G. Abitare l’ufficio: percezione e ambiente, (prima parte), in Habitat Ufficio n°42. 1990.
Fuller, M. Concept and practice of architectural daylighting, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc., New York. 1985.
Heerwagen J.H. ,Heerwagen D.R., Lighting and psychological comfort, Lighting Design and Application 16 (4).1986.
Origlia G. Abitare l’ufficio: la psicologia dell’ambiente di lavoro, in Habitat Ufficio n°43. 1990.
Piccoli B., ed altri, Effetti extra visivi della luce, in Edifici Intelligenti n°3. 1994.
Raiteri S. Ambiente luminoso e parametri socioculturali, in Office Lay-out n°52. 1993.
Reinhart, C., J. Mardaljevic, and Z. Rogers. Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design. National Research Council Canada. 2006.
Rogora, A. Il progetto illuminato, in Modulo n°191.1993.
Scuri P. Vederci non basta, in Costruire n°135. 1994.
Slater, Lighting controls in offices: How to improve occupant comfort and energy efficiency, in: Proceedings of the CIBSE National Lighting Conference, Bath, London, UK: CIBSE, pp. 178–184. 1996.
Tuaycharoen, N. and P.R. Tregenza . View and Discomfort Glare from Windows. Lighting Research and Technology, 39: 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365782807077193
Veitch J.A., Psychological processes influencing lighting quality, Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 30 (1). 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/00994480.2001.10748341
Zelenay, K., Perepelitza M. and Lehrer D., High-Performance Facades: Design Strategies and Applications in North America and Northern Europe. California Energy Commission 51. 2011.
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Universitat Politècnica de València
e-ISSN: 2444-9091 http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio