From BIM to Agentic AI: predictive management systems and phygital digital twins for built heritage

Daniele Fanzini

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4432-6171

Italy

Politecnico di Milano image/svg+xml

Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering

Giorgio Casoni

Italy

Politecnico di Milano image/svg+xml

Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering.

Angelo De Cocinis

Italy

E-making srl

|

Accepted: 2026-01-28

|

Published: 2026-03-30

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2026.24846
Funding Data

Downloads

portada

Keywords:

Agentic AI, ACDat, DIGITAL TWIN, anticipatory governance, phygital platforms

Supporting agencies:

This research was not funded

Abstract:

Information flow management is the backbone of digital transformation in the construction sector: the Data Sharing Environment (ACDat) enables integration and full interoperability, extending the potential of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and promoting sustainability in the management of the building life cycle. At the same time, the emergence of Agentic AI introduces a cognitive shift: autonomous, adaptive, and proactive agents take on design, cognitive, and institutional roles, helping redefine and even anticipate decision-making processes, organizational models, and market dynamics. In this context, the article presents the e-Building platform currently being tested, which combines ACDat, Agentic AI, and digital twins within a phygital logic. The platform automates document classification and building information handover through natural language and information constantly updated by the digital twin, with the result of evolving ACDat from a management infrastructure to a true cognitive ecosystem. The e-Building pilot (TRL 3–4) demonstrates that integrating Agentic AI with ACDat transforms predictive management from a technical tool to a paradigm of anticipatory governance.

Show more Show less

References:

Addis, M. (2016). ‘Tacit and explicit knowledge in construction management’. Construction Management and Economics, 34(7-8), 439-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1180416

Agwa, T.C., Oti, A.H., & Kurul, E. (2025). ‘From barriers to breakthroughs: A deep dive into BIM adoption’. Buildings 15(7), 1116. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15071116

ArkDesign AI. (2025). AI-powered generative design platform [WWW document]. URL https://www.arkdesign.ai (accessed 13 September 2025).

Autodesk. (2024). Connected Data Environment for Digital Twins. Autodesk Whitepaper [WWW document]. URL https://damassets.autodesk.net/content/dam/autodesk/www/pdfs/cde-whitepaper-en.pdf (accessed 13 September 2025).

Berger, H., Svensson, T., & Røstvik, H.N. (2022). Spacemaker.Ai: Using AI in developing urban block variations. In: M. Jabi (ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Architecture. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823941-4.00010-X

Cabitza, F., Rasoini, R., & Gensini, G.F. (2017). ‘Unintended consequences of machine learning in medicine’. JAMA, 318(6), 517–518. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7797

Carrillo, P., Ruikar, K., & Fuller, P. (2013). ‘When will we learn? Improving lessons learned practice in construction’. International Journal of Project Management, 31(4), 567-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.005

Casoni, G. (2025). Sperimentazione di sistemi di anticipazione autonomi. In: F. Celaschi, G. Formia, G. Casoni and V. De Matteo (eds.), Design e anticipazione: Change studies, processi, metodi e tecnologie per l’innovazione. Bologna University Press, Bologna. https://doi.org/10.30682/9791254776544

Doxel Inc. (2025). AI-powered construction management [WWW document]. URL https://www.doxel.ai (accessed 13 September 2025).

Ganuthula, V.R.R., & Balaraman, K. (2025). ‘Skill-based labor market polarization in the age of AI: A comparative analysis of India and the United States’. arXiv [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.15809

Garicano, L. (2000). ‘Hierarchies and the organization of knowledge in production’. Journal of Political Economy, 108(5), 874–904.

Hackitt, J. (2018). Building a safer future: Independent review of building regulations and fire safety. UK Government, London.

Hasan, A., & Jha, K. N. (2024). A holistic evaluation of BIM implementation barriers in the Indian construction industry: Pre- and postadoption perspectives. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2024.2320108

Kang, J., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2024). ‘A comprehensive framework for digital twins of buildings: From BIM to real-time analytics’. Journal of Building Engineering, 78, 107654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.107654

Kokotajlo, D., Alexander, S., Larsen, T., Lifland, E., & Dean, R. (2025). AI 2027. AI Futures Project [WWW document]. URL https://ai-2027.com (accessed 13 September 2025).

Krishnan, N. (2025). ‘AI agents: Evolution, architecture, and real-world applications’. arXiv.[Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.12687

Mäkelä, E., & Stephany, F. (2024). ‘Complement or substitute? How AI increases the demand for human skills’. arXiv [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.19754

Miller, J., Nguyen, T., & Sørensen, A. (2025). ‘BIM interoperability: A systematic review and future research agenda’. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 3121. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063121

Monumental Robotics. (2025). Automating on-site construction with robotics and software. [WWW document]. URL https://www.monumental.co (accessed 13 September 2025).

Mousavi, M., Hosseini, M.R., & Martek, I. (2024). ‘Digital twins in the AEC industry: Challenges and opportunities’. Digital, 4(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital4010004

National Research Foundation. (2018). Virtual Singapore: A dynamic 3D city model and collaborative data platform. Government of Singapore, Singapore.

Radzi, A. R., Azmi, N. F., Kamaruzzaman, S. N., Algahtany, M., & Rahman, R. A. (2025). ‘Challenges in construction readiness for BIM-based building projects’, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 24(3), pp. 1689–1704. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2024.2343803

Revolti, A., Gualtieri, L., Pauwels, P., & Dallasega, P. (2024). ‘From building information modeling to construction digital twin: A conceptual framework’. Production & Manufacturing Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2024.2387679

Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K.I., & Karkee, M. (2025). ‘AI agents vs. Agentic AI: A conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges’. arXiv [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.10468

Tran, H.V. (2024). ‘A review of challenges and opportunities in BIM adoption for construction project management’. Engineering Journal, 28(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2024.28.2.121

UK Government. (2022). Building Safety Act 2022. The Stationery Office, London.

Vepřek, L.H. (2024). At the edge of AI. transcript Verlag, Bielefeld. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839472286

Wissuchek, C., & Zschech, P. (2025). ‘Exploring Agentic AI systems: Towards a typological framework’. arXiv [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.00844

Yan, L., Chen, X., & Zhao, J. (2025). ‘Common data environment for digital twins in the built environment: Enablers and challenges’. Automation in Construction, 162, 105612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2025.105612

Yang, K., & Zhai, C. (2025). ‘Ten principles of AI agent economics’. arXiv [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.20273

Yitmen, I. (Ed.). (2023). Cognitive digital twins for smart lifecycle management of built environment and infrastructure: Challenges, opportunities and practices. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003230199

Show more Show less