Housing and Democracy: 50 years of Local Support Ambulatory Service (SAAL) interventions
Submitted: 2025-05-14
|Accepted: 2025-06-09
|Published: 2025-06-27
Copyright (c) 2025 VITRUVIO - International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Keywords:
Local Support Ambulatory Service (SAAL), Democracy, Portugal, Housing
Supporting agencies:
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT)
Abstract:
This research adopts a historical, social, and cultural approach to analyze and illustrate the evolution of participatory architecture in Portugal, exploring its connections with critical theory and international practices. The study seeks to celebrate the achievements of the SAAL interventions while drawing inspiration from their strategies to actively contribute to a more inclusive and promising future for local communities. By addressing questions concerning the current state of SAAL interventions, how residents organize their lives and activities, and the potential for participatory interventions today and in the future, the research follows a chronological framework that considers past experiences, present conditions, and future possibilities. Focusing on four key aspects - social relations, the built environment, participatory policies and practices, and collective memory - the study provides a renewed perspective on SAAL interventions, on four neighborhoods in Portugal: Fonsecas and Calçada in Lisbon (by Hestnes Ferreira, October 1974), Lapa in Porto (by Matos Ferreira, November 1974), Maceda in Porto (by Soutinho, October 1974), and Pego Longo in Sintra (by Costa Cabral, August 1975). Reflecting on the fragility of the SAAL process, which was cut short before fully realizing its potential, this research aims to reassess these neighborhoods 50 years later. By revisiting its legacy, we propose to empower local communities and advocate for a more sustainable and participatory future.
References:
AAVV (1961). Arquitectura Popular em Portugal [Popular Architecture in Portugal]. Lisboa: Sindicato Nacional dos Arquitectos.
Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Baker, M., Coaffee, J., Sherriff, G. (2007.) Achieving successful participation in the new UK spatial planning system. Planning Practice & Research, 22(1), pp. 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450601173371
Bandeirinha, J.A. (2011). O Processo SAAL e a Arquitectura no 25 de Abril de 1974 [The SAAL Process and Architecture on April 25, 1974]. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade. https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-1265-2
Brown, G., Kyttä, M. (2018). Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: toward integration or increased specialization? Applied Geography, 95, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.002
Coelho, A. B., Cabrita, A. R., (2009) Habitação evolutiva e adaptável. Lisboa. LNEC
“Constituição da República Portuguesa”: Diário da Assembleia Constituinte, nº. 132, 3-4-1976, data da sessão 2-4-1976, p. 4392.
Cabré, A., Andrés, R. (2018). Cooperative housing policies in Europe: From unsustainable privatization to self-managed alternatives. Housing Studies, 33(6), 857–876.
D’Almeida, P.B., Marat-Mendes, T. (2022). Housing matters in the 1970s: foundations, legacies, and impacts from the national laboratory for civil engineering’s research in Portugal. Planning Perspectives published online. http://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2022.2101142
D’Almeida, P.B., Marat-Mendes, T., Toussaint, M. (2022). Portugal’s Rising Research in Architecture and Urbanism: The Influence of International Research Centers and Authors. Journal of Urban History, 48(4) (First Published November 12, 2020), 807-834. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144220968078
Goodin, R.E. (1993). Democracy, preferences and paternalism. Policy Sciences, 26(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10. 1007/BF00999718
Ferreira, A.D. de M. (1995). Aspectos da organização do espaço português [Aspects of the organization of portuguese space]. 2ª ed. Porto: FAUP Publicações.
Ferreira, A.F. (1984). Crise do alojamento e construção clandestina em Portugal. [Housing crisis and illegal building in Portugal]. Sociedade e Território, 1, 29-37.
Ferreira, A.F. (1987). Por uma nova política de habitação [For a new housing policy] Edições Afrontamento, Porto.
Ferreira, R.H. (1976). Le 25 Avril 1974 … et les Architectes. L’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui, (185), 58-59.
Ferreira, R.H. (2007). Intervenção SAAL [SAAL Intervention]. Coimbra (documento não editado), 1-8.
Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214009
Healey, P. (2003). Collaborative Planning in Perspective. Planning Theory, 2(2), 101-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022002
Healey, P. (2006). Collaborative Planning – Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.
Innes, J., Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170
Innes, J. (2005). Living in the house of our predecessors: The demand for new institutions for public participation. Planning Theory & Practice, 6(3), 431–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350500209710
Irvin, R. A., Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
Lobato, A. (2017). Is this what the democratic city looks like? Local democracy, housing rights and homeownership in the Portuguese context. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 41(3), 426-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12491
Medeiros, E. (2021). Urban participatory planning approaches in capital cities: the Lisbon case. European Planning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1973379
Nuojua, J. (2010). Web Map Media: A map-based Web application for facilitating participation in spatial planning. Multimedia Systems, 16(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-009-0175-z
Peker, E. (2020). Re-Thinking the Production of Urban Built Environments in the Face of Climate Change. Urban Res. Pract., 13, 465–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1798690
Portas, N. (1969) Funções e exigências de áreas da habitação [Functions and requirements of housing areas]. Lisboa: LNEC.
Portas, N. (2004) A habitação social: proposta para a metodologia da sua arquitectura [Social housing: proposal for the methodology of its architecture]. Porto: FAUP Publicações.
Portas, N. (2007) A cidade como arquitectura [the city as architecture]. Lisboa: Livros Horizonte, 2007.
Roberts, N. (2004) Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), 315–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074004269288
Rowe, G., Frewer, L.J. (2000) Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1), 3– 29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
Saraiva, A. (2018). Tempo e espaço no Bairro Fonsecas e Calçada: A experiência urbana de Raúl Hestnes Ferreira [Time and space in the Fonsecas and Calçada neighborhood: The urban experience of Raúl Hestnes Ferreira]. In Calix, T., Fernandes, A. S., Sucena, S., Travasso, N. and Moreira, B. (Ed.), PNUM 2018: A produção do território: Formas, processos, desígnios, 919-930.
Tonkiss, F. (2013) Cities by Design: The Social Life of Urban Form. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Tummers, L. (2016). The re-emergence of self-managed co-housing in Europe: A critical review of co-housing research. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2023–2040. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586696
