CiaBOT: the circular design of an experimental microarchitecture between material and immaterial values
Submitted: 2024-04-05
|Accepted: 2024-06-07
|Published: 2024-06-28
Copyright (c) 2024 VITRUVIO - International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Keywords:
Circular design experimentation, waste as values, self-construction, co-design, appropriate technologies, belvedere microarchitecture
Supporting agencies:
Abstract:
The transition to a circular economy entails new challenges for architects and designers. Among these, one challenge is to look at waste not only as new resources, from an environmental perspective, but also as bearers of information capable of communicating their history and origin. Moreover, waste can be considered as a means of activating unexpected knowledge and social connections. The article illustrates a circular design experimentation, conducted with architecture and design students and a wine farm, which led to the creation of the CiaBOT project, a belvedere aimed at enhancing the landscape and providing a temporary stopping point in the Monferrato hills (UNESCO World Heritage Site, Italy). CiaBOT is not only a belvedere but is a microarchitecture capable of conveying both material and immaterial cultural values. Its form and materials are intimately connected with the territory with and for which it was designed. These make CiaBOT a “space” of hybridization and dialogue between agricultural tradition and innovation. But it is also a “space” of fieldwork education and knowledge co-generation in which academic and non-academic stakeholders have measured themselves. Through the description of the different stages of the design process, the article is part of the debate on new sustainable ways of designing and building, reflecting on new models of circular economy based as much on design strategies and processes as on the enhancement of human labor and the use of technologies appropriate to the context and actors.
References:
Blomsma, F., & Brennan, G. (2017). The Emergence of Circular Economy - A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21, 603-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603
Bolger, P., Brereton, P., Grant, O., & Torney, D. (2021). Better together: knowledge co-production for a sustainable society. Royal Irish Academy.
Calisto Friant, M., Vermeulen, W.J.V., & Salomone, R. (2020). A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917
Condotta, M., & Zatta, E. (2020). Reusing Time in architecture: The practice of reusing building products and components. Techne, 10(20),113-121. https://doi.org/10.13128/techne-8209
Dokter, G., Thuvander, L., & Rahe, U. (2020). How circular is current design practice? Investigating perspectives across industrial design and architecture in the transition towards a circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 692-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.032
Homrich, A.S., Galvão, G., Abadia, L.G., Carvalho, M.M., Homrich, A.S., Galv, G., Galvão, G., Abadia, L.G., & Carvalho, M.M. (2018). The circular economy umbrella - Trends and gaps on integrating pathways. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 525-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.064
Illich, I. (1973). Tools for Conviviality. Harper & Row, New York.
Irwin, E.G., Culligan, P.J., Fischer-Kowalski, M. et al. (2018). Bridging barriers to advance global sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 1, 324-326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0085-1
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy - An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, conservation and recycling, 127, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Leising, E., Quist, J., & Bocken, N. (2018). Circular Economy in the building sector - Three cases and a collaboration tool. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 976-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.010
Massaro, S. (2023). Abitare Circolare. Reimmaginare gli scarti come beni comuni e futuri asset culturali. D Editore, Roma.
Mies, A., & Gold, S. (2021). Mapping the social dimension of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 128960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128960
Montacchini, E., Tedesco, S., & Di Prima, N. (2021a). Designing Circularity. The circular economy for landscape and territory. A new life for landscape, architecture and design, 158-173. Palermo University Press.
Montacchini, E., Tedesco, S., & Di Prima, N. (2021b). Progettare e sviluppare l'economia circolare. Un'esperienza didattica sulla trasformazione di rifiuti in nuove risorse per l'architettura e il design. Anteferma edizioni, Cornegliano (TV).
Moreno, M., De los Rios, C., Rowe, Z., & Charnley, F. (2016). A conceptual framework for circular design. Sustainability, 8(9), 937. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090937
Muñoz, P., Morales, M.P., Mendívil, M.A., Juárez, M.C., & Muñoz, L. (2014). Using of waste pomace from winery industry to improve thermal insulation of fired clay bricks. Eco-friendly way of building construction. Construction and Building Materials, 71, 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.027
Rathje, W.L., & Murphy, C. (2001). Rubbish!: the archaeology of garbage. University of Arizona Press.
Salvia, R., Andreopulou, Z.S., & Quaranta, G., (2018). The Circular Economy: A Broader Perspective for Rural Areas. Rivista di studi sulla sostenibilità, 87-105. https://doi.org/10.3280/RISS2018-001008
Schumacher, E.F. (1973), Small is beautiful - Economics as if people mattered. Harper & Row, New York.
Van Hinte, E., Peeren, C., & Jongert, J. (2007). Superuse: constructing new architecture by shortcutting material flows. Oio Publishers, Rotterdam.




