Innovative housing policy tools: impact indicators in the NRRP Urban Regeneration Programmes

Adolfo Francesco Lucio Baratta; Laura Calcagnini; Fabrizio Finucci; Antonio Magarò

doi:10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2023.19476

Authors

Adolfo F. L. Baratta Roma Tre University
Laura Calcagnini Roma Tre University
Fabrizio Finucci Roma Tre University
Antonio Magarò Roma Tre University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2023.19476

Keywords:

PINQuA, Housing quality, Housing policies, Indicators-based evaluation models, Social Housing

Abstract

The topic of indicators as measurers of the effectiveness of urban and housing transformations strongly re-emerge because of the performance approach the funding of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) is based on. Within the NRRP specific programmes, the issue of performance measurability of interventions was managed with the application of different indicators and application methods. The research group had the opportunity to work on the construction of a system of indicators for a national urban regeneration programme, financed within the NRRP.

This paper describes the research aimed at the definition of the indicators for evaluating the design proposals applied to the NRRP financed program called PINQuA (Innovative Programme for Housing Quality). The proposed system of indicators proved useful to promote an objective reading of the interventions and to encourage, in the design proposals application, the response to housing quality criteria aimed, among other issues, at improving the cultural condition of the contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Adolfo F. L. Baratta, Roma Tre University

Department of Architecture

Laura Calcagnini, Roma Tre University

Department of Architecture

Fabrizio Finucci, Roma Tre University

Department of Architecture

Antonio Magarò, Roma Tre University

Department of Architecture

References

Audit Commission (2002) Suggested Key Indicators for Economic Regeneration. London: HMSO.

AA.VV (2022) Rilanciare le politiche pubbliche per l’abitare. Osservatorio nazionale sulle politiche abitative e di rigenerazione urbana (WWW document) https://www.forumdisuguaglianzediversita.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/DOCUMENTO_Rilanciare-le-politiche-pubbliche-per-l’abitare.pdf (accessed 6 March 2023).

Azzone, G., and Dente, B. (1999). Valutare per governare. Il nuovo sistema dei controlli nelle Pubbliche amministrazioni. RCS Libri S.p.A. Milano.

Baratta, A. F. L. (2022) A new vision of living and living spaces in the RRP (Recovery and Resilience Plan). TECHNE - Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment 24, 20-25. https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-13435.

Baratta, A. F. L., Finucci, F. and Magarò, A. (2021). Generative Design Process: Multi-criteria Evaluation and Multidisciplinary Approach. Technè n. 21|2021, pp. 304-314.

Baratta, A. F. L., Calcagnini, L., Finucci, F. and Magarò (2022) Gli indicatori di impatto nei Programmi di rigenerazione urbana del PNRR. In: Costruire in Laterizio, Tecniche Nuove, Milano, n. 190 (luglio 2022), 60-67.

Bassanini, F. (1999). Prefazione. In Azzone, G. and Dente, B. Valutare per governare. Il nuovo sistema dei controlli nelle Pubbliche amministrazioni. RCS Libri S.p.A. Milano, 2-6.

Cecodhas (2007), Housing Europe 2007: Review of Social, Co-operative and Public Housing in the 27 Eu Member States, European Social Housing Observatory Publications, Brussels, October.

Clemente, C. (2012) Nuove strategie di programmazione tecnica per l'abitare. In Todaro, B., Giancotti, A. and De Matteis, F. (eds) Housing. Linee guida per la progettazione di nuovi insediamenti. Prospettive Edizioni, Roma, 22-25.

Direttiva 2004/18/CE. (2004) Coordinamento delle procedure di aggiudicazione degli appalti pubblici di lavori, di forniture e di servizi (WWW document) eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/it/TXT/?uri=celex:32004L0018 (accessed 6 March 2023).

Federcasa. (2020). Dimensione del disagio abitativo pre e post emergenza Covid-1. (http://cms.federcasa.it/download) (access 01.06.2023).

Gann, D., Salter, A. and Whyte, J. (2003) Design quality indicator as a tool for thinking. Building research & information 31(5), 318-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321032000107564

Ghekière, L. (2007) Le développement du logement social dans l’Union Européenne. Quand l’intérêt général rencontre l’intérêt communautaire, CECODHAS-USH-Dexia. Dexia Editions. Paris.

Ginelli, E. (2022). L'edilizia residenziale pubblica in Italia. Definizioni e prospettive. In: Materiali di Architettura e di Urbanistica, , 16, 49-57.

Housing Europe (2022) The State of Housing in the EU 2017 (WWW document) https://www.housingeurope.eu/resource-1705/the-state-of-housing-in-europe-2022 (accessed 6 March 2023).

ISTAT. (2022). Report Le statistiche dell’ISTAT sulla povertà | Anno 2021, 15 giugno 2022. (www.istat.it/it/files/2022/06/Report_Povert%C3%A0_2021_14-06.pdf) (accessed 01.06.2023).

Jasch, C. (2000) Environmental performance evaluation and indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production 8 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00235-8

Kemeny J., Kersloot, J., Thalmann, P. (2005), Non-profit Housing Influencing, Leading and Dominating the Unitary Rental Market: Three Case Studies, in «Housing Studies», 6, pp. 855-872. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030500290985

Lungarella, R. (2010), “Social Housing: una definizione inglese di Edilizia Residenziale Pubblica?, in Rivista Studi Giuridici e Politici, numero monografico: Politiche sociali e diritto alla casa, anno XXXI, 3/4, 2010.

Maggino, F. (2006). Gli indicatori statistici: concetti, metodi e applicazioni. In Elettronico, 1-485

Marinelli, M. and Antoniou, F. (2020) Improving public works’ value for money: a new procurement strategy&quot. In: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 13,1, 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2018-0084

Martini, A. and Sisti, M. (2002) Indicatori o analisi di performance? Implicazioni dell’esperienza statunitense di performance measurement. Rivista trimestrale di scienza dell’amministrazione 2, 31-62.

Miccoli, S., Finucci, F., and Murro, R. (2014). The evaluation of architectural design quality. In: International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2014, 1023-1030. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2014/B41/S15.124

MIMS (2022). Rapporto del Programma Innovativo Nazionale per la Qualità dell’Abitare. Progetti e prime evidenze.

MISE (2020) Strategia per la riqualificazione energetica del parco immobiliare nazionale. Documenti per la consultazione pubblica. (WWW document) https://www.mise.gov.it/images/stories/documenti/STREPIN_2020_rev_25-11-2020.pdf (accessed 6 March 2023).

Nassar U. A., Shimaa A. and Rasha M. (2016) Shaban New Approach for Assessing Urban Regeneration Performance in Egypt International Journal of Energy and Environment, Volume 10, 2016

OECD (2020) Social housing: A key part of past and future housing policy (WWW document) https://www.oecd.org/social/social-housing-policy-brief-2020.pdf (accessed 6 March 2023).

Opschoor, H. and Reijnders, L. (1991) Toward sustainable development indicators. In: Kuik, O., Verbruggen, H. (Eds.), In Search of Indicators of Sustainable Development. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3246-6_2

Pasquini, 2018 Lettera (WWW document) http://www.unioneinquilini.it/index.php?id=8392 (accessed 6 March 2023).

Perobelli, E. and Saporito, R (2022) Case popolari, un modello che non funziona (WWW document).https://lavoce.info/archives/93615/case-popolari-un-modello-che-non-funziona/ (accessed 6 March 2023).

Romito, S, (2019). In Italia la casa non è più un diritto. Il paradosso delle case popolari è un problema da risolvere (WWW document) https://thevision.com/architettura/case-popolari-diritto/ (accessed 6 March 2023).

Simioni, G. and Garavalli, M. (2022) Le case popolari in Italia tra opportunità e problemi (WWW document) https://www.orizzontipolitici.it/case-popolari-opportunita-e-problemi/ (accessed 6 March 2023).

Socco, C., Cavaliere, A., Guarini, S., and Madeddu, M. (2002). Cosa sono gli indicatori di sostenibilità e perché sono indispendabili. Osservatorio Città Sostenibili. (http://win.comune.teano.ce.it/public/file/Agenda%2021%20Locale/cosa%20sono%20gli%20indicatori.PDF ) (accessed 6 march 2023).

Tessaro, F. (2012). Lo sviluppo della competenza. Indicatori e processi per un modello di valutazione. In Formazione & InsegnamentoX – 1 – 2012, 105-119.

Vafaei, N., Ribeiro, R. A. and Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2016) Normalization techniques for multi-criteria decision making: analytical hierarchy process case study. In doctoral conference on computing, electrical and industrial systems, 261-269. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31165-4_26

Wong, C. (1995) Developing quantitative indicators for urban and regional policy analysis. In: Hambleton, R. and Thomas, H. (Eds), Urban Policy Evaluation: Challenge and Change. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 111–122.