A new construction approach for tiny house on wheels: POD THOWs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2023.19350

Keywords:

Tiny house on wheel, Tiny House, Tiny house barriers, POD THOWs

Abstract

Although the size of the houses has increased in recent years, the number of house users is decreasing. The decrease in the number of users has brought forth the concept of tiny houses which use less materials, less energy, and produce less waste compared to large houses. There are several types of tiny houses, with tiny houses on wheels (THOWs) being the most preferred type. However, THOWs are subject to high-way rules because they are not permanent structures. Such rules limit the dimensions of THOWs, thus preventing the creation of necessary spaces in the interior. In this study, we exanimated mobile housing, revealed barriers to their use and dissemination, and proposed a system called POD-THOW, which could offer a solution to the space needs of THOWs. As a result, it was understood that POD-THOWs provide a solution to size restrictions, but they should be combined with lightweight constructions and sustainable energy sources to prove effective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Tayfur Emre Yavru, Karadeniz Technical University

Department of Architecture

Gürkan Topaloğlu, Karadeniz Technical University

Department of Architecture

Güray Yusuf Baş, Karadeniz Technical University

Department of Architecture

Semih Yılmaz, Karadeniz Technical University

Department of Architecture

References

Auto Smart Retail. (2020). 7 Types of Caravans. [WWW document]. URL www.autosmartretail.com.au/7-types-of-caravans/ (accessed 15 January 2023).

Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanliği. (2017). Planlı Alanlar İmar Yönetmeliği, [WWW document]. URL www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=23722&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5 (accessed 31 October 2022).Google Trends. (2021).

Google Trend Search: Tiny Houses. [WWW document]. URL trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=tiny%20house(accessed 15 October 2022).

Groeninx van Zoelen, A. (2021). Tiny Houses: A History Thesis on the Tiny House Movement.

Harris, T. (2018). The tiny house movement: Challenging our consumer culture. Rowman & Littlefield.

Hodkinson, S., and Robbins, G. (2013). The return of class war conservatism? Housing under the UK Coalition Government. Critical Social Policy, 33(1), 57-77. https://doi.org /10.1177/0261018312457871

ICC. (2017). Overview of the International Residential Code® (IRC®). International Code Council. [WWW document]. URL www.iccsafe.org /codes-tech-support/codes/2018-i-codes/irc/ (accessed 15 October 2022).

IRC. (2018). Overview of the International Residential Code® (IRC®). Appendix Q. [WWW document]. URL codes.iccsafe.org /content/IRC2018/appendix-q-tiny-houses (accessed 15 October 2022).

Kautz, A.W. (2011). 880 Square foot house: a small residential design that transforms to accommodate multiple household types. Florida: Florida State University.

Louche, D. (2012). Tiny House Design & Construction Guide: Your Guide to Building a Mortgage Free, Environmentally Sustainable Home. Tiny Home Builders.

Mangold, S., and Zschau, T. (2019). In search of the “Good Life”: The appeal of the tiny house lifestyle in the USA. Social Sciences, 8(1), 26. https://doi.org /10.3390/socsci8010026

Morrison, A., and Morrison, G. (2017). Tiny House Designing, Building, & Living. Penguin.

Mukhopadhyay, J. (2020). Observations of energy consumption and IEQ in a ‘Tiny House’. Building Research & Information, 48(6), 613-631. https://doi.org /10.1080/09613218.2019.1661765

Mutter, A. (2013). Growing tiny houses: Motivations and opportunities for expansion through niche markets. IIIEE Master thesis.

Neufert, E., and Neufert P. (2012). Neufert Architects’ Data. Fourth Edition, Wiley-Blackwell.

Shafer, J. (2009). The small house book. Tumbleweed Tiny House Company.

Shearer, H. (2018). Tiny Houses: Planning for Affordability and Inclusion. On the use of building information modelling for design integrated approach, 7.

Shearer, H., and Burton, P. (2018). Towards a typology of tiny houses. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(3), 298-318. https://doi.org /10.1080/14036096.2018.1487879

Shearer, H., and Burton, P. (2021). Tiny houses: movement or moment? Housing Studies, 1-23. https://doi.org /10.1080/02673037.2021.1884203

Shearer, H., Bares, V., Pieters, R., Winkle, B. and Meathrel, K. (2018). Planning for tiny houses. Australian Planner, 55(3-4), 147-156. https://doi.org /10.1080/07293682.2019.1632358

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Yavru, T. E., Topaloğlu, G., Baş, G. Y. and Yılmaz, S. (2023) “A new construction approach for tiny house on wheels: POD THOWs”, VITRUVIO - International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability, 8(1), pp. 20–33. doi: 10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2023.19350.

Issue

Section

Articles