UAV oblique photogrammetry and lidar data acquisition for 3D documentation of the Hercules Fountain

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2017.5961

Keywords:

3D documentation, building archaeology, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), close-range photogrammetry (CRP), oblique cameras

Abstract

This paper discusses some enhancements concerning 3D modelling, and the integration and comparison of 3D data from aerial and terrestrial sensors, developed by innovative geomatics techniques around the metric documentation of cultural heritage. In archaeology, it is interesting to deal with the considerable advantages of new multi-sensor approaches for the data acquisition and the management phases in terms of the sustainability (automated acquisition, quickness, precision, time and cost cutting). In particular, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles(UAVs)photogrammetry with the joint use of nadir and oblique cameras can be usefully combined with the large-scale details acquired by the terrestrial Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)in vast areas or complex objects, especially in mostly vertical sized objects. Here, we will report the results of an integrated 3D survey in an archaeological context in the Piedmont region of Italy. The Hercules Fountain is located in the gardens of the Venaria Reale (a Savoy Royal Palace included in the UNESCO heritage list) and has witnessed several events and historical phases during the past centuries–from its construction in the 16thcentury to its disuse and decline in the 17thcentury, right up to the 21stcentury when it was eventually brought back to light. The goal of the test is the creation of a3D continuous model of the site for documentation purposes, future consolidation, and enhancement projects finalised fora public promotion. To meet these strategic aims, a terrestrial laser scanning (TLS henceforth) survey has been designed together with multi-flights by a multi-rotor UAV and terrestrial close-range photogrammetry (CRP) acquisition to produce a highly detailed 3D textured model from which we have inferred standard 2D drawings, digital orthoimages, and further 3D products. In conclusion, the entire workflow and the outputs have been compared together to evaluate the effectiveness of each elaboration according to the different goals of the survey.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Filiberto Chiabrando, Politecnico di Torino

Department of Architecture and Design

Antonia Spanò, Politecnico di Torino

Department of Architecture and Design

Giulia Sammartano, Politecnico di Torino

Department of Architecture and Design

Lorenzo Teppati Losè, Politecnico di Torino

Department of Architecture and Design

References

Aicardi, I., Chiabrando, F., Grasso, N., Lingua, A. M., Noardo, F., & Spanò, A. T. (2016). UAV photogrammetry with oblique images: First analysis on data acquisition and processing. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 41-B1, 835–842.http://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B1-835-2016

Baik A., Yaagoubi R., & Boehm, J. (2015). Integration of Jeddah historical BIM and 3D GIS for documentation and restoration of historical monument. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40-5/W7,29–34. http://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W7-29-2015

Balletti, C., Guerra, F., Scocca, V., & Gottardi, C. (2015). 3D integrated methodologies for the documentation and the virtual reconstruction of an archaeological site. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40-5/W4, 215-212. http://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W4-215-2015

Blaeu, J.(1682). Theatrum statuum regiae celsitudinis Sabaudiae ducis, Pedemontii principis, Cypri regis. Pars prima, exhibens Pedemontium, et in eo Augusta Taurinorum, & loca viciniora. Amsterdam: JoanBlaeu.

Boehler,W., & Marbs A. (2004).3D scanning and photogrammetry for heritage recording: a comparison. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Geoinformatics (pp. 291-298).Sweden: Gavle University Press.

Brumana, R., Bregianni, A., Georgopoulos, A., Oreni, D., & Raimondi, A. (2013). From survey to HBIM for documentation, dissemination and management of built heritage: The case study of St. Maria in Scaria d'Intelvi. Digital Heritage International Congress, 2013, Volume 1,497–504. http://doi.org/10.1260/2047-4970.2.3.433

Bruno, A., & Vinardi, M. G. (1990). La Fontana d’Ercole a Venaria Reale. Studi Piemontesi, 19, fasc. II,395-396.

Castellamonte, A. (1674). Venaria Reale, Palazzo di Piacere, e di Caccia, ideato dall’Altezza Reale di Carlo Emanuele II Duca di Savoia, Re di Cipro etc. disegnato e descritto dal conte Amedeo di Castellamonte l’anno 1672. Torino. Bartolomeo Zapatta.

Checa, Z. P., Morales, A. F., & Hernández, L. A. (2014). Combination of low cost terrestrial and aerial photogrammetry: three-dimensional survey of the church of San Miguel in Ágreda (Soria). Virtual Archaeology Review, 5(10), 51–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/var.2014.4210

Chiabrando, F., Lingua, A., Maschio, P., &Teppati Losè, L. (2017). The influence of flight planning and camera orientation in UAVs photogrammetry. A test inthe area of Rocca San Silvestro (LI), Tuscany. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42-2/W3, 163–170. http://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W3-163-2017

Cornaglia, P. (1994). Giardini di marmo ritrovati. La geografia del gusto in un secolo di cantiere a Venaria Reale (1699-1798). Torino: Lindau.

Escarcena, J. C., de Castro, E. M., García, J. L. P., Calvache, A. M., del Castillo, T. F., García, J. D., & Castillo, J. C. (2011). Integration of photogrammetric and terrestrial laser scanning techniques for heritage documentation. Virtual Archaeology Review, 2(3), 53–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/var.2011.4605

Giacomino, G. (2005). Venaria, I lavori potrebbero riservare altre sorprese. La Stampa, 25/08/2005. From: http://archivio.lastampa.it/m/articolo?id=cfcf9e875c6ae2bd0a172adfa14e8d05a97131f8 [02/25, 2016]

Gini, R., Pagliari, D., Passoni, D., Pinto, L., Sona, G., & Dosso, P. (2013). UAV photogrammetry: Block triangulation comparisons The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40-1/W2, 157–162.http://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W2-157-2013

Landeschi, G., Dell'unto, N., Lundqvist, K., Ferdani, D., Campanaro, D.M., & Leander Touati, A.M. (2016). 3D-GIS as a platform for visual analysis: Investigating a Pompeian house. Journal of Archaeological Science,65, 103–113. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.11.002

Lerma, J. L., Navarro, S., Cabrelles, M., & Villaverde, V. (2010). Terrestrial laser scanning and close range photogrammetry for 3D archaeological documentation: the Upper Palaeolithic Cave of Parpalló as a case study. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(3),499–507. http:/doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.10.011

Lerma, J. L., Seguí, A. E., Cabrelles, M., Haddad, N., Navarro, S., & Akasheh, T. (2011). Integration of laser scanning and imagery for photorealistic 3D architectural documentation. C.-C.Wang (Ed.) Laser Scanning, Theory and Applications, INTECH Open Access Publisher, 413–430. http://doi.org/10.5772/14534

MiBACT, (2014). Rilevazione 2014 Musei, monumenti e Aree Archeologiche statali. Available: http://www.statistica.beniculturali.it/rilevazioni/musei/Anno%202014/MUSEI_TAVOLA8_2014.pdf [02/25, 2016]

Patias, P. (2013). Overview of applications of close-range photogrammetry and vision techniques in Architecture and Archaeology. McGlone, C. (Ed.), Manual of Photogrammetry 6th Edition. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 1093-1107.

Remondino, F., Barazzetti, L., Nex, F., Scaioni, M., & Sarazzi, D. (2011). UAV photogrammetry for mapping and 3D modeling–current status and future perspectives. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38-1/C22, 25-31. http://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-1-C22-25-2011

Rupnik, E., Nex, F., & Remondino, F.(2013). Automatic orientation of large blocks of oblique images. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40-1/W1, 299–304. http://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W1-299-2013

Rupnik, E., Nex, F., & Remondino, F. (2014). Oblique multi-camera systems –orientation and dense matching issues. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40-3/W1,107–114. http://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-W1-107-2014

Shan, J., & Toth, C. (2008). Topographic Laser Ranging and Scanning: Principles and Processing. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC press.

Strecha, C. (2014). The ray Cloud–a vision beyond the point cloud. FIG Congress 2014, Engaging the Challenges -Enhancing the Relevance, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 16 –21 June 2014

Whitehead, K., & Hugenholtz, C. H. (2015). Applying ASPRS accuracy standards to surveys from small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 81(10), 787–793. http://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.81.10.787

Wiedemann, A., & More, J. (2012). Orientationstrategies for aerial oblique images. TheInternational Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 39-B1, 185–189. http://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B1-185-2012

Xiao, J., Gerke, M., & Vosselman, G. (2012). Building extraction from oblique airborne imagery based on robust façade detection. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 68, 56–68. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.12.006

Downloads

Published

2017-05-22

How to Cite

Chiabrando, F., Spanò, A., Sammartano, G., & Teppati Losè, L. (2017). UAV oblique photogrammetry and lidar data acquisition for 3D documentation of the Hercules Fountain. Virtual Archaeology Review, 8(16), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2017.5961

Issue

Section

Articles