Concerning the Paradox of Paradata. Or, “I don’t want realism; I want magic!”

Authors

  • Richard C. Beacham University of London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2011.4550

Keywords:

London charter, Paradata, 3D modelling

Abstract

Traditional written historical investigation and analysis have from the beginning consisted of a sometimes unstable mixture of fact and conjecture, hard evidence and inspired imagination. To encourage 3-D modelling of cultural heritage artefacts to be taken seriously as historical scholarship this inevitable and ambiguous balance can be highlighted and to a significant degree documented and modulated by London Charter principles. This enhances the scholarly integrity of these models as examples of serious research based historical investigation, and helps avoid the dangers of inflated or unverified “media hype” which can compromise or discredit such work .

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Richard C. Beacham, University of London

King’s Visualisation Lab. King’s College, University of London. U.K.

References

COLLINGWOOD, R. G. (1924): Spectaclum Mentis. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

COLLINGWOOD, R. G. (1925): "Some Perplexities About Time", in Outlines of a Philosophy of Art. Oxford.

VON RANKE, L. (1874): Geschichte der romanischen und germanischen Völker von 1494 bis 1514. Leipzig.

Published

2011-05-20

How to Cite

Beacham, R. C. (2011). Concerning the Paradox of Paradata. Or, “I don’t want realism; I want magic!”. Virtual Archaeology Review, 2(4), 49–52. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2011.4550

Issue

Section

Articles