A cognitive-axiological approach to print eco-advertisements in the economist: the energy sector under scrutiny
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2009.735Keywords:
advertising discourse, axiological linguistics, cognitive semantics, eco-linguistics, metaphors and metonymies, analysis of valuesAbstract
In this paper we intend to map out some of the dominant values in print advertisements announcing different types of environmentally friendly products and services from energy (oil, electricity, etc.) and heavy industry corporations. We will analyse the qualities and values explicitly linked to ecological samples through metaphors, metonymies and image schemas and the way in which they are introduced in advertisingdiscourse. To this end, we have selected a corpus of sample advertisements published in 12 editions of The Economist, a well-known, prestigious business magazine. The Lakoffian semantics analysis will be used in order to give us a more reliable estimate of values and metaphorical processes linked to environmental topics as well as an account of the cognitive and discursive means used to denote them.
Downloads
References
Andreu, G., Ericsson, L., Ohlsson, R. and Tännsjö, T. (1978). Rhetoric and Ideology in Advertising (A Content Analytical Study of American Advertising). Stochholm: LiberFörlag.
Aslam, M. M. (2006). “Are you selling the right colour? A cross-cultural review of colour as a marketing cue”. Journal of Marketing Communications, 12-1: 15-30.
Barcelona, Antonio (1998). “The state of the art in the cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy and its application to English studies”. The European English Messenger, 7-2: 42-50.
Bhatia, V.K. (1992). “Discourse functions and pragmatics of mixing: advertising across cultures”. World Englishes, 11-2/3: 195-215.
Brennan, M. (2008). “What Color Is Your Advertising? How Color Theory Can Make Your Marketing More Effective”. EzineArticles.com. 16 Apr. 2008.
Caillat, Z. & Mueller, B. (1996). “Observations: the influence of culture on American and British advertising: an exploratory comparison of beer advertising”, Journal of Advertising Research, 36-3: 79-88.
Cheng, H. & Schweitzer, J. (1996). “Cultural values reflected in Chinese and U.S. television commercials”, Journal of Advertising Research, 36-3: 27-44.
Cortés de los Ríos, Mª E. (2001). Nuevas perspectivas lingüísticas en la publicidad impresa anglosajona. Almería: Universidad.
Delbecque, N. & Leuven, K. (1990). “El lenguaje de la publicidad y su poder de sugestión. Anuncios publicitarios en El País Semanal: Los tópicos más frecuentes y su formulación”, Lingüística española actual, XII, Madrid: 197-213.
Díez Velasco, O. (2001). “Metaphor, metonymy and image schemas: An analysis of conceptual interaction patterns. Journal of English Studies 3: 47-63.
Felices Lago, A. (2006). “La codificación del parámetro axiológico en la terminología financiera y de inversión: el español y el portugués frente a la influencia del inglés”, in M. V. Calvi and L. Chierichetti (eds.). Nuevas tendencias en el discurso de especialidad. Linguistic Insights 50. (Studies in Language and Communication). Bern: Peter Lang: 203-222
Felices Lago, A. (2008). “Las cualidades demandadas al solicitante de empleo en español frente al inglés: análisis semántico-axiológico de las ofertas de trabajo en la prensa española”, in M. V. Calvi, G. Mapelli, J. Santos López (eds.). Lingue, culture, economia. Comunicazione e pratiche discorsive. Milan: Franco Angeli: 95-110.
Feldman, J. (2006). From Molecule to Metaphor. A Neural Theory of Language. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge.
Forceville, C. (2002). “The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors”. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1-14.
Forceville, C. (2006).“Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research”, in G. Kristiansen et alii. (eds.). Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 379-402.
Gibbs, R. & Coslton, H. (2006). “The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transfromations” in D. Geraerts (ed.). Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 239-268.
Harré, R. et alii (1999). Greenspeak: a Study of Environmental Discourse. London: Sage.
Hampe, B. (ed.) (2005). From Perception to Meaning. Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Herrero Ruiz, J. (2002). “Sequencing and integration in metaphor-metonymy interaction”. RESLA, 15: 73-91
Hurtienne J. and Israel, J. (2007): “Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: intuitive patterns of tangible interaction. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction: 127-134.
Jhally, S. (1987). The Codes of Advertising. London: Routledge.
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Khale, L. (1986): “Using the list of values (LOV) to understand consumers”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6-3: 5-12.
Krzeszowski, T.P. (1990). “The axiological aspect of idealized cognitive models”, in J. Tomaszczyk & B.Lewandowska (eds.). Meaning and Lexicography. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 135- 165.
Krzeszowski, T.P. (1993). “The axiological parameter in preconceptual image schemata”, in R.A. Geiger & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.). Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 307-330.
Krzeszowski, T.P. (1997). Angels and Devils in Hell. Elements of Axiology in Semantics. Warsaw: Energeia.
Krzeszowski, T.P. (2004). “Metaphors of discourse: Between co-operative and oppositional discourses” in A. Duszak, U. Okulska (eds.). Speaking from the Margin. Global English from a European Perspective. Frankfurt: Peter Lang: 107-116.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1993). “The Temporary Theory of Metaphor” in A. Ortony, A. (ed.).Metaphor and Thought. (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 202-251.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Núñez Percuha, B. (2003). Esquemas de imágenes y modelos populares: un estudio del lenguaje de la victimización en textos narrativos en lengua inglesa. Logroño: AESLA.
Martin, J., R., and Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London, New York: Continuum.
Pauwels, P. and Simon-Vandenbergen, A-M. (1993). “Value judgment in the Metaphorization of linguistic action”, in R.A.Geiger & B.Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.). Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 331-367.
Pauwels, P. & Simon-Vandenbergen, A-M. (1995). “Body parts in linguistic action: underlying schemata and value judgments”, in L. Goossens, P. Pauwels et alii (eds.). By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 35-70.
Peeters, B. (2003). “Le transculturel. Sémantique, pragmatique, axiologie”. La linguistique 39-1: 119-133.
Peña, S. (2000). A Cognitive Approach to Image-Schematic Component in the Metaphorical Expression of Emotion in English. Logroño: Universidad de la Rioja.
Peña, S. (2003). Topology and Cognition: What Image-Schemas Reveal about the Metaphorical Language of Emotions. Müchen: Lincon Europa.
Pollay, R. W. (1984). “The Identification and Distribution of Values Manifest in Print Advertising”, 1900-1980. In R.E. Pitts and A.G. Woodside (eds.). Personal Values and Consumer Psychology. Lexinton, MS: Lexinton Press: 11-129.
Radden, G. (2000). “How metonymic are metaphors?” In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter,: 93-108.
Rocamora Abellán, R. (2004). “Cognitive devices throughout different advertising styles: How metaphors sell holidays”, in I.
Sanz Sainz y A. Felices Lago (eds). Las Nuevas Tendencias de las Lenguas de Especialidad en un Contexto Internacional y Multicultural. Granada: Universidad de Granada: 839-847.
Roher, T. (1995). “ The metaphorical language of (political 9 rape: The new worldorder”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10: 115-37.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (1997). “Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual interaction”. ATLANTIS 19-1: 201-295.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (1998). “On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon”. Journal of Pragmatics 30-3: 259-274.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2000). “The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy”, in A. Barcelona Sánchez (ed.). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 109-132.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. and Mairal Usón, R. (2007). “High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction”, in Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg & Peter Siemund. (eds.) Aspects of Meaning Construction in Lexicon and Grammar. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 33-49.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A-M. (1995). “Assessing linguistic behaviour: a study of value judgements”, in L. Goossens, P. Pauwels et alii (eds.). By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 71-123.
Stibbe, A. (2006). “Deep Ecology and Language: The Curtailed Journey of the Atlantic Salmon”. Society and Animals, 14-1: 61-77.
Stibbe, A. (2005). “Environmental education across cultures: beyond the discourse of shallow environmentalism”, Language & Intercultural Communication, 4-4: 242-260.
Taylor, John R., (1995): Linguistic Cross-categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks.
Umiker-Sebeok, J. (1996). “Power and the construction of gendered spaces”. International Review of Sociology, 6-3; 389-403.
Ungerer, F. (2000). “Muted metaphors and the activation of metonimies in advertising”, in A. Barcelona Sánchez (ed.). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 321-340.
Velasco Sacristán, M. and Fuertes Olivera, P. (2004). “Metáfora y LSP: Valor cognitivo de la metáfora en el discurso publicitario de British Cosmopolitan”, in I. Sanz Sainz and A. Felices Lago (eds.). Las Nuevas Tendencias de las Lenguas de Especialidad en un Contexto Internacional y Multicultural. Granada: Universidad de Granada: 863-878.
Zaltman, G. and Coulter, R. H. (1995). “Seeing the voice of the consumer: Metaphor based advertising research”. Journal of Advertising Research, 35-4: 35-50.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.