Manner in L2 German: evidence from motion event encoding
Submitted: 2025-10-24
|Accepted: 2026-05-13
|Published: 2026-07-24
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Keywords:
motion events, boundary-crossing, Manner verbs, typological awareness, German as a Foreign Language
Supporting agencies:
This study is part of the project PID2023-151333NB-I00 “CLAVDAP-MULTLEX: Verb Classes in (Semi-)Academic and Professional Discourse: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the German and Spanish Lexicon”, funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF/EU, and led by Professor Meike Meliss of the University of Santiago de Compostela.
Abstract:
This study investigates the encoding of Manner in ablative and adlative boundary-crossing motion events in German, comparing the oral productions of native speakers of German and Spanish with those of Spanish-speaking learners at proficiency levels B1, B2, and C1. The findings reveal that the rhetorical style of Spanish and the typological contrasts between German and Spanish are reflected in the learners’ interlanguage. Although learners show increasing use of Manner verbs with higher proficiency, the overall analysis of Manner expression indicates significant differences between the German control group and the experimental group.
The results underscore the need to integrate tasks in German as a Foreign Language (DaF) instruction that account for the role of context in Manner encoding and promote the development of typological awareness. They further emphasize the importance of addressing second-tier verbs and constructions such as kommen + Partizip II in classroom practice, to provide a more comprehensive representation of motion lexicalization patterns in the target language.
References:
Alonso Alonso, R. (2018). Translating motion events into typologically distinct languages. Perspectives, 26/3, 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2017.1387578
Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (Vol. 15, pp. 1–15). https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v15i0.1753
Athanasopoulos, P., & Bylund, E. (2013). The “thinking” in thinking-for-speaking: Where is it? Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 4/1, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.4.1.05ath
Athanasopoulos, P., Damjanovic, L., Burnand, J., & Bylund, E. (2015). Learning to think in a second language: Effects of proficiency and length of exposure on English learners of German. The Modern Language Journal, 99/S1,138–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12183.x
Ballweg, S. (2013). Wie lernt man die Fremdsprache Deutsch? Klett.
Baudot, D. (2009). Er kam gelaufen. Schon gut, aber wozu denn? Funktionen der Struktur kommen + Part. II. In R. Brdar Szabó, E. Knipf-Komlòsi, & A. Pèteri (Eds.), An der Grenze zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik (pp.109–119). Peter Lang.
Bauer, L. (2012). Transfer von L1-Strukturen in Beschreibungen von Bewegungsereignissen bei japanischen DaFLernern. Informationen Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 39/1, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/infodaf-2012-0103
Berthele, R. (2017). When bilinguals forget their manners: Language dominance and motion event descriptions in French and German. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 39–70.
Berthele, R., & Stocker, L. (2017). The effect of language mode on motion event descriptions in German-French bilinguals. Language and Cognition, 9/4, 648–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.34
Cadierno, T. (2008). Motion events in Danish and Spanish: A focus on form pedagogical approach. In S. de Knop & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar: A volume in honour of René Dirven (pp. 259–295).De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110205381.3.259
Cadierno, T., & Lund, K. (2004). Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition: Motion events in a typological framework. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 139–155). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cadierno, T., & Ruiz, L. (2006). Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.08cad
Daller, M. H., Treffers-Daller, J., & Furman, R. (2011). Transfer of conceptualization patterns in bilinguals: The construal of motion events in Turkish and German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14/1, 95–119.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000106
De Knop, S. (2015). Visualization and conceptual metaphor as a tool for the teaching of abstract motion in German. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 13/1, 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.13.1.07kno
Eggelte, B. (2020). Deutsche Grammatik. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
Gerling, M., & Orthen, N. (1979). Deutsche Zustands- und Bewegungsverben: Eine Untersuchung zu ihrer semantischen Struktur und Valenz. Narr.
Goschler, J. (2019). Transfer in die L2 bei der Kodierung räumlicher Bewegung. In B. Lübke & E. Liste Lamas (Eds.), Raumrelation im Deutschen: Kontrast, Erwerb und Übersetzung (pp. 91–110). Julius Groos.
Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. (2003). Language background questionnaire. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Hammarberg, B. (2001). Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production and acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 21–41). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.29278493.5
Hess, K. (2007). Verb und Direktivum: Ein Beitrag zum deutsch-spanischen und spanisch-deutschen Sprachvergleich. Peter Lang.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2009). Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & Ş. Özçalışkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 403–414). Psychology Press.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Hijazo-Gascón, A., & Mendo Murillo, S. (2017). Preposiciones, partículas del movimiento y estilo retórico en ELE: Un análisis desde la lingüística cognitiva. Cuadernos AISPI, 10, 63–90. https://doi.org/10.14672/aispi.2017.10.63
Jessen, M., & Cadierno, T. (2013). Variation in the categorization of motion events by Danish, German, Turkish, and L2 Danish speakers. In J. Goschler & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (pp. 133–163). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.41.06jes
Liste-Lamas, E. (2015a). The German directional adverbs with hin- and her-: A preliminary study on their acquisition by L1 speakers of Spanish. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano & A. Hijazo-Gascón (Eds.), New horizons in the study of motion (pp. 7–28). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Liste-Lamas, E. (2015b). Der Erwerb räumlicher Relationen im Deutschen durch Lerner mit Spanisch als L1: Der Fall von hin- und her-. In B. Handwerker, R. Bäuerle, I. Doval, & B. Lübcke (Eds.), Zwischenräume: Lexikon und Grammatik im Deutschen als Fremdsprache (pp. 77–93). Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
Liste-Lamas, E. (2016a). Über einige Merkmale der Wegkodierung im Deutschen als Fremdsprache bei Lernern mit Spanisch als L1. In F. Robles i Sabater, D. Reinmann, & R. Sánchez Prieto (Eds.), Sprachdidaktik SpanischDeutsch (pp. 33–49). Narr Francke Attempto.
Liste-Lamas, E. (2016b). Path encoding in German as a foreign language: Difficulties encountered by L1 Spanish learners. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 4/1, 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2016-0006
Madlener-Charpentier, K., & Liste Lamas, E. (2022). Path under construction: Challenges beyond S-framed motion event construal in L2 German. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.859714
Muñoz Carrasco, M., & Cadierno, T. (2019). Mr. Bean exits the garage driving or does he drive out of the garage? Bidirectional transfer in the expression of path. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching,57/1, 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-2006
Özçalışkan, Ş. (2015). Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36/2, 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000325
Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2006). When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The crosslinguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition, 98/3, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.005
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (2008). Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and L2 instruction: Issues for research. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 489–547). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938560-28
Scheirs, V. (2015). Der Frosch, der geht: Zum Ausdruck von Bewegung bei französischsprachigen Deutschlernern. In I. Doval & B. Lübcke (Eds.), Raumlinguistik und Sprachkontrast (pp. 235–251). Iudicium.
Slobin, D. I. (2017). Typologies and language use. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications (pp. 419–447). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.17slo
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol. 2. Typology and process in concept structuring. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6848.001.0001
Vogel, P. M. (2005). Neue Überlegungen zu den Fügungen des Typs sie kamen gelaufen. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 33/1, 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.2005.33.1.57
