Las relaciones retóricas y la memoria operativa en la comprensión textual de la población infantil: el desentrañamiento anafórico
Submitted: 2024-09-02
|Accepted: 2025-04-08
|Published: 2025-07-25
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Keywords:
rhetorical relationship, working memory, textual comprehension, child population, anaphora, pronoun
Supporting agencies:
Abstract:
The present study seeks to demonstrate that textual comprehension is linked to the unraveling of rhetorical relationships and that the complexity of the hierarchy derived from rhetorical relationships is determined by the development of working memory (WM). Furthermore, the idea is defended that the more rhetorical relationships the subject can establish, the greater its capacity to determine the referent of a pronominal element. To demonstrate this thesis, we started with a child population (fourth and sixth grade children); These were evaluated on the different components of the WM, their capacity for anaphoric resolution and the rhetorical complexity of their texts. The results show that short-term working memory and long-term working memory proposed by Ericsson and Kintsch (1995) are predictors of the memory of the two main types of rhetorical relationships (coordinated and subordinate), although in an asymmetric way. Likewise, it was shown that, indeed, the subjects who established more rhetorical relationships (coordinated or subordinate) were those who established the antecedent of the rhetorical element with a greater degree of accuracy.
References:
Ahmed, Y., Francis, D.J. Ork, M., Fletcher, J.M., Barnes, M., Kulesz, P. (2016). Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44-45, 68 - 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.002
Alloway, T.P., Gathercole, S.E., Willis, C., Adams, A.M. (2004). A structural analysis of working memory and related cognitive skills in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(2), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2003.10.002
Almor, A., Nair, V.A. (2007). The form of referential expressions in discourse. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(1‐2), 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2007.00009.x
Ariel, M. (2001). Accessibility Theory: an overview. En T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord y W. Spooren (eds.). Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects (pp. 29-89), John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.8.04ari
Asher, N. (1998). Discourse Structure and the Logic of Conversation. First Workshop on Non-narrative Text Structure. Elsevier: 1-28. http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/philosophy/faculty/asher/.../DSLC.ps
Asher, N. (2000). Events, facts, propositions, and evolutive anaphora. En J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi & A. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of events (pp. 123-150). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195128079.003.0006
Asher, N., Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge University Press.
Asher, N., Hunter, J., Thompson, K. (2020). Modelling structures for situated discourse. Dialogue & Discourse, 11, 89-121. https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2020.104
Asher, N., Lascarides, A. (2008). Segmented Discourse Representation Theoty: Dynamic Semantics with Discourse Structure. En Harry Bunt y Reinhard Muskens (eds.), Computing Meaning (pp. 87-124). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5958-2_5
Baddeley, A.D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. (2000) The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in cognitive sciences4(11), 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01538-2
Baddley, A. (2006). Working Memory: Overview. En S.J. Pickering (ed.), Working memory and education (pp. 1-31), Academic press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012554465-8/50003-X
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual review of psychology, 63, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
Belyaev, O. (2015). Systematic mismatches: Coordination and subordination at three levels of grammar1. Journal of Linguistics, 51(2), 267-326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226714000450
Benamara, F., Asher, N., Mathieu, Y.Y., Popescu, V., Chardon, B. (2016). Evaluation in discourse: A corpus-based study. Dialogue & Discourse, 7(1), 1-49. https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2016.101
Bittner, D. (2007). Influence of animacy and grammatical role on production and comprehension of intersentential pronouns in German L1-acquisition. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 48, 103-138. https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.48.2007.356
Bower, G.H., Morrow, D.G. (1990). Mental Models in Narrative Comprehension. Science, 247, 44-48. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2403694
Borzone, A.M. (2005). La resolución de anáforas en niños: incidencia de la explicitud y de la distancia. Interdisciplinaria, 22(2), 155-182. http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?pid=S1668-70272005000200003&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
Briz Gómez, A. (2001). El español coloquial en la conversación: esbozo de pragmagramática.
Briz Gómez, A. (2016). Español coloquial. En Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica (pp. v2-463). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713441-115
Brown, A.L., Smiley, S.S. (1978). The development of strategies for studying texts. Child Development, 49/4, 1076-1088. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128747
Cain, K., Oakhill, J.V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11, 489 -503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
Carden, G. (1986). Blocked forwards coreference: Theoretical implications of the acquisition data. En Barbara Lust (ed.), Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora (319-357), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4548-7_10
Carreiras, M., Gernsbacher, M., Villa, V. (1995). The advantage of first mention in Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2(1), 124-129. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214418
Chmielewski, T.L., Dansereau, D.F. (1998). Enhancing the recall of text: knowledge mapping training promotes implicit transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 407-413. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.407
Cook, L.K., Mayer, R.E. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 448-456. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.448
Cromley, J.G., Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
Cromley, J.G., Snyder-Hogan, L.E., Luciw-Dubas, U.A. (2010). Reading comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 687-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019452
Costa Ferreira, J.G., Ferrari-Neto, J. (2021). Processing of coreferential relations and their relationship with the working memory: the influence of syntactic distance on anaphora processing in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(S2), 1012-1033. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.904110
Dansereau, D.F., Newbern, D. (1997). Using knowledge maps to enhance teaching, en W.E. Campbell y K.A. Smith (eds), New paradigms for college teaching (pp. 125-147). Interaction Book Company.
Diakidoy, I.N., Stylianou, P., Karefillidou, C. y Papageorgiou, P. (2005). The relationship between listening and reading comprehension of different types of texts at increasing grade levels. Reading Psychology, 26: 55-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710590910584
Elleman, A.M. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761-781. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000180
Ericsson, K.A., Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological review, 102(2), 211-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
Florit, E., Roch, M., Levorato, M.C. (2011). Listening text comprehension of explicit and implicit information in preschoolers: The role of verbal and inferential skills. Discourse Processes, 48(2), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2010.494244
Garnham, A. (2000). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Psychology Press.
Garrido, J. (2017). Segmentación del discurso e interacción. Círculo de Linguística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 71, 35-62. https://doi.org/10.5209/CLAC.57302
Garrido, J., Ramalle, T.R. (2015). Constituyentes y relaciones en la oración y en el discurso. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 62, 200-25. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CLAC.2015.v62.49504
Garrod, S., Sanford, A. (1995). Incrementality in discourse understanding. En D. Milward y P. Sturt (ed.) Incremental Interpretation (pp. 99-122), Centre for Cognitive Science (University of Edinburg).
Gernsbacher, M.A. (1990). Language Comprehension as Structure Building. Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA221854
González Álvarez, J., Cervera Crespo, T., Miralles Adell, J.L. (1998). La adquisición de las relaciones anafóricas en castellano: clases de anáforas y efecto de la distancia. Infancia y Aprendizaje 82, 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037098320784844
Glenberg, A.M., Meyer, M., Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(87)90063-5
Grosz, B.J., Sidner, C.L. (1986). Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3):175-204.
Hendriks, P., Koster, C., Hoeks, J.C. (2014). Referential choice across the lifespan: Why children and elderly adults produce ambiguous pronouns. Language, cognition and neuroscience, 29(4), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.766356
Hoek, J., Evers-Vermeul, J., Sanders, T.J. (2018). Segmenting discourse: Incorporating interpretation into segmentation?. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(2), 357-386. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0042
Hoover, W.A. y Gough, P.B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2: 127-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799
Hunter, J., Asher, N., Lascarides, A. (2018). A formal semantics for situated conversation. Semantics and Pragmatics, 11 (10), 1-54. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.11.10
Hyönä, J. (1994). Processing of Topic Shifts by Adults and Children. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/747739
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive psychology, 45(3), 337-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00500-5
Hyams, N., Orfitelli, R. (2017). The acquisition of syntax. The Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 593-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118829516.ch26
Järvikivi, J., Pyykkönen-Klauck, P., Schimke, S., Colonna, S., Hemforth, B. (2014). Information structure cues for 4-year-olds and adults: tracking eye movements to visually presented anaphoric referents. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29(7), 877-892. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.804941
Järvikivi, J., van Gompel, R.P.G, Hyönä, J., Bertram, R. (2005). Ambiguous pronoun resolution: Contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts. Psychological Science 16(4), 260-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01525.x
Johnson, R.E. (1970). Recall of prose as a function of the structural importance of the linguistic units. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 9(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(70)80003-2
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kamp, H., Reyle, U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1616-1
Kintsch, W. (1976). Memory for prose. En Cofer, C.N. (ed.), The structure of human memory (pp. 90-113), Freeman.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological review, 95(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61551-4
Kintsch, W. (2018). Revisiting the construction-integration model of text comprehension and its Implications for Instruction. En Alvervamann, D.E., Unrau, N.J., Ruddell, R., Theoretical models and processes of literacy(pp. 805-839). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110592-12
Kintsch, W., Patel, V.L., Ericsson, K.A. (1999). The role of long-term working memory in text comprehension, Psychologia, 42, 186-198.
Kintsch, W., Van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological review, 85(5), 363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
Kolhatkar, V., Roussel, A., Dipper, S., Zinsmeister, H. (2018). Anaphora with non-nominal antecedents in computational linguistics: a survey. Computational Linguistics, 44/3, 548-612. https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI a 00327
Lascarides, A., Asher, N. (2007). Segmented Discourse Representation Theory: Dynamic semantics with discourse structure. En Bunt, Harry C. & Muskens, Reinhard (eds.), Computing meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy (vol. 3, 87-124). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5958-2_5
Loaiciga Sanchez, S. (2017). Pronominal anaphora and verbal tenses in machine translation (Tesis Doctoral). University of Geneva.
Lust, B., Clifford, T. (1986). The 3D study: Effects of depth, distance, and directionality on children's acquisition of anaphora. En B. Lust (ed.), Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora, Vol. I, Defining the Constraints, 203-243. D. Reidel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4548-7_6
Lust, B., Loveland, K., Kornet, R. (1980). The development of anaphora in first language: Syntactic and pragmatic constraints, Linguistic Analysis 6, 359-391.
MacDonald, M., MacWhinney, B. (1990). Measuring inhibition and facilitation from pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 469-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(90)90067-a
Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A. (1987). Rhetorical Structure Theory: a framework for the analysis of texts, Papers in Pragmatics 1, 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(87)90128-x
Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: toward a functional theory of text organization, Text 8(3), 243-281. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243
Mayer, R.E. (2010). Aprendizaje e instrucción. Alianza.
McElree, B., Foraker, S., Dyer, L. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 67-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00515-6
McKoon, G., Ratcliff, R. (1980). The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(6), 668-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90355-2
Meyer, B.J., Brandt, D.M., Bluth, G.J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading research quarterly, 72-103. https://doi.org/10.2307/747349
Meyer, B.J., Poon, L.W. (2001). Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of educational psychology, 93(1), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.141
Myers, J.L., O'Brien, E.J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse processes, 26(2-3), 131-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545042
McNamara, D.S., Kintsch, W. (2019). Working memory in text comprehension: Interrupting difficult text. En Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society(pp. 104-109). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315789422-44/working-memory-text-comprehension-interrupting-difficult-text-danielle-mcnamara-walter-kintsch
Narbona. (2019). Sintaxis del español coloquial. Universidad de Sevilla.
Nicol, J., Swinney, D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 18(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01069043
Oakhill, J.V. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 31- 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1984.tb00842.x
Oakhill, J.V., Patel, S. (1991). Can imagery training help children who have comprehension problems? Journal of Research in Reading, 14, 106 -115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1991.tb00012.x
Prat-Sala, M., Branigan, H.P. 2000. Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language 42(2), 168-182. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2668
Rapp, D.N., Taylor, H.A. (2004). Interactive dimensions in the construction of mental representations for text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(5), 988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.988
Rizzi, L. (2003). Comparative syntax and language acquisition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203461785
Rönnberg, J. (2003). Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: A framework and a model. International Journal of Audiology, 42, 68-76. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020309074626
Rönnberg, J., Rudner, M., Foo, C., Lunner, T. (2008). Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). International Journal of Audiology, 47(2), 99-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020802301167
Rönnberg, J., Rudner, M., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A.A. (2010). When cognition kicks in: Working memory and speech understanding in noise. Noise and Health, 12(49), 263. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.70505
Rose, R. 2007. Pronoun resolution and the influence of syntactic and semantic information on discourse prominence. En Branco, A., McEnery, T., Mitkov, R., Silva, F. (ed.), 6th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (pp. 28-43), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71412-5_3
Sanders, T.J., Gernsbacher, M.A. (2004). Accessibility in text and discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 37(2), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315046105-1
Serra, M. (2013). Comunicación y lenguaje. La nueva neuropsicología cognitiva II. Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona.
Sörqvist, P., Rönnberg, J. (2012). Episodic long-term memory of spoken discourse masked by speech: what is the role for working memory capacity? Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 55 (1), 210-218, https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0353)
Tomlin, R., Pu, M. (1991). The management of reference in Mandarin discourse. Cognitive Linguistics 2: 65-93. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1991.2.1.65
Tordera Yllescas, J.C. (2021). La evolución de las relaciones retóricas y de la anáfora en niños hispanohablantes. Lengua y Habla, (25), 268-294.
Unrau, N.J., Alvermann, D.E., Sailors, M. (2018). Literacies and their investigation through theories and models. En Alvervamann, D.E., Unrau, N.J., Ruddell, R., Theoretical models and processes of literacy (pp. 3-34). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110592-2
Van Dijk, T.A. (1977a). Text and context. Logman.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1977b). Semantic macro-structures and knowledge frames in discourse comprehension, en M.A. Just y P.A. Carpenter (ed.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 3-31), Taylor & Francis Grup.
Van Dijk, T.A., Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic press. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.473.5491&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Verstraete, J.C. (2005). Two types of coordination in clause combining. Lingua,115, 611-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.09.018
Vosniadou, S., Pearson, P.D., Rogers, T. (1988). What causes children's failures to detect inconsistencies in text? Representation versus comparision difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.1.27
Wigglesworth, G. (1990). Children's narrative acquisition: A study of some aspects of reference and anaphora. First language 10(29), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379001002902
Yuill, N., Oakhill, J. (1991). Children's problems in text comprehension: An experimental investigation. Cambridge University Press.
