Determinants of IMV take-up among homeless people in Spain
Submitted: 2025-07-09
|Accepted: 2025-10-06
|Published: 2025-11-04
Copyright (c) 2025 Nuria Badenes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Keywords:
Social assistance, Minimum income, Takcup, Poverty, Homelessness
Supporting agencies:
Abstract:
Only 7% of homeless people who are entitled to receive Minimum Living Income (IMV) do so. Analysis of take-up using logistic regression shows that the amount of the benefit does not act as an incentive to apply: the greater the need, the lower the number of applications. Other factors that reduce the likelihood of applying for the IMV are sleeping on the streets or having been homeless for a longer period, which suggests that the costs of uprooting associated with belonging to this group may outweigh the potential benefits of receiving the IMV, preventing applications and creating a vicious circle of despair. The consideration of variables that measure the desire to improve one's situation indicates that there are also virtuous circles: those who are looking for work or have access to a flat are more likely to apply.
Support and the dissemination of information by social workers—not only about requirements, but also about the benefits linked to the IMV—could encourage applications among homeless people. Another solution lies in the automatic collection of the IMV through a negative income tax, which requires the public administration to share its information resources and the generalisation of income tax without a lower income limit. The expansion, unification and dissemination of information to the research community would also generate advantages in the study of homelessness and the possibilities for proposing solutions.
References:
Acceso Vital. Información y apoyo para el acceso al IMV (2024). ¿Por qué no solicitamos el IMV cuando nos corresponde? Los factores explicativos del non-take-up en territorios donde existe pobreza severa. Ed. EAPN España.
Acorn, S. (1993). “Emergency shelters in Vancouver, Canada”. Journal of Community Health, 18(5), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321789
AIReF (2023) “2.ª Opinión. Ingreso Mínimo Vital”. Opinión 2/23.
Baicker, K., Congdon, W. J. and Mullainathan, S. (2012) “Health Insurance Coverage and Take-up: Lessons from Behavioral Economics”. Milbank Quarterly, 90:107-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00656.x
Bargain, O., Immervoll, H. y Viitamäki, H. (2012) “No claim, no pain. Measuring the non-take-up of social assistance using register data”. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 10(3): 375-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-010-9158-8
Begin, P. (1996). Homelessness in Canada: Minister of Supply and Services Canada. Ottawa, O.N.: Canada Communication Group.
Boccadoro, N. (2014). European Minimum Income Network thematic report: Non-take-up of minimum income schemes by the homeless population. Analysis and Road Map for Adequate and Accessible Minimum Income Schemes in EU Member States.
Brousse, C. (2006) “Le réseau d’aide aux sans-domicile: un univers segmenté”. Economie et statistique, 391-392:15-34. https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2006.7152
Bruckmeier, K. and Wiemers, J. (2012) “A new targeting: a new take-up? Non-take-up of social assistance in Germany after social policy reforms”. Empirical Economics 43: 565-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0505-9
Chareyron, S. (2015) “Take-up of Social Assistance Benefits: The case of Homeless”. TEPP (Travail, Emploi et Politiques Publiques) Working Paper. 2015-07.
Chareyron, S. and Domingues, P. (2018). “Take-up of Social Assistance Benefits: The Case of the French Homeless”. The Review of Income and Wealth, 64(1): 170-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12274
Christensen, J., Aarøe, L., Baekgaard, M., Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. P. (2020). “Human capital and administrative burden: The role of cognitive resources in citizen‐state interactions”. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13134
Currie, J., (2004) “The Take-up of Social Benefits”. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 10488. https://doi.org/10.3386/w10488
Daponte, B.O., Sanders, S. and Taylor, L. (1999) “Why do low-income households not use food stamps? Evidence from an experiment”. Journal of Human Resources 1: 612-628. https://doi.org/10.2307/146382
Eurofound (2015). Access to social benefits: Reducing non-take-up. Publications office of the European Union. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2015/access-social-benefits-reducing-non-take
Falk, G. (2017). “Temporary assistance for needy families (TANF): Size of the population eligible for and receiving cash assistance”. Congressional Research Service Report R44724.
Faciam (2021) “Entender el sinhogarismo” https://faciam.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Separata-01-web.pdf
Finn, D. and Goodship, J. (2014). “Take-up of benefits and poverty: an evidence and policy review”. JRF/CESI Report.
Fondation Abbé Pierre and FEANTSA (2023). Eighth Overview of Housing Exclusion in Europe 2023. https://www.feantsa.org/en/report/2023/09/05/report-8th-overview-of-housing-exclusion-in-europe-2023
Fuchs, M., Gasior, K., Premrov, T., Hollan, K. and Scoppetta, A. (2020) “Falling through the social safety net? Analysing non-take-up of minimum income benefit and monetary social assistance in Austria”. Social Policy Administration 54: 827-843. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12581
García Pérez, C. y Cabrera, A. (2022) “Sinhogarismo en España. Perfiles y determinantes de la percepción de la Renta Mínima de Inserción” Papeles de Trabajo del IEF. 8/2022.
Hernanz, V., Malherbet, F. y Pellizzari, M. (2004) “Take-up of Welfare Benefits in OECD Countries”, OECD Social Employment and Migration Working Paper No. 17, OECD, Paris.
Isaac Muhambya, B. (2021). “Reasons for non-take-up of social rights by homeless and poor families”. Academia Letters, Article 3993. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3993
Khalifi, L., Bermejo, E., Pérez Rosa, T., Hernández Martín, A. y Abellán, J. (2016). “¿Por qué las PSH no solicitan ayuda económica? El caso de la RMI en España”. Actas de la XVIII Reunión de Economía Mundial.
Kleven, H.J., and Kopczuk, W. (2011) “Transfer program complexity and the take-up of social benefits”. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3 (1): 54-90. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.3.1.54
Ko, W. and Moffitt, R. A. (2022) “Take-up of Social Benefits” NBER Working Paper No. 30148. June 2022. https://doi.org/10.3386/w30148
Kreider, B. and Nicholson, S. (1997). “Health insurance and the homeless”. Health Economics, 6(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199701)6:1<31::AID-HEC242>3.0.CO;2-M
McCarthy, B. (1995.) On the Streets: Youth in Vancouver. Victoria: British Columbia Ministry of Social Services.
Moffit, R. (1983). “An Economic Model of Welfare Stigma”. The American Economic Review. Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 1023-1035.
Muñoz-Higueras, D., Granell, R. & Fuenmayor, A. (2023): “Could the impact of a public policy help us evaluate the changes that have been implemented? An analysis of non-take-up of Spanish minimum income benefits”. Review of Economic Analysis 15 (3-4), 185-213. https://doi.org/10.15353/rea.v15i3-4.5097
Muñoz-Higueras, D., Köppe, S., Granell, R., & Fuenmayor, A. (2024). “Non-take-up of in-work benefits: Determinants, benefit erosion and indexing”. Journal for Labour Market Research, 58(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-024-00385-8
Phillips, D. C., James X. Sullivan, J. X. (2023) “Do Homelessness Prevention Programs Prevent Homelessness? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial”. The Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01344
Remler, D.K. and Glied, S.A. (2003) “What other programs can teach us: Increasing participation in health insurance programs”. American Journal of Public Health 93(1): 67-74. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.1.67
Riphahn, R. T. (2001). “Rational Poverty or Poor Rationality? The Take‐up of Social Assistance Benefits”, Review of Income and Wealth, 47(3): 379-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4991.00023
Rodilla Navarro, J. M., Puchol Ros, G. y Botija Yagüe, M. (2023). “Sinhogarismo y fuente de ingresos: estudio longitudinal sobre la influencia del apoyo formal y la renta del trabajo en la reducción del sinhogarismo”. OBETS. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 18(1): 173-188. https://doi.org/10.14198/obets.22619
Schoeni, R. F. and Koegel, P. (1998). “Economic resources of the homeless: evidence from Los Angeles”. Contemporary Economic Policy, 16(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1998.tb00520.x
Secretaría General de Inclusión (2024): Laboratorio de Políticas de Inclusión. Resultados de Evaluación EAPN-ES: Proyecto Acceso Vital para la Detección y Movilización de personas en Situación de Non-take-up. Madrid: Ministerio de Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones.
Szeintuch, S. (2020). Homeless without benefits: the non-take-up problem. Housing Studies, 37(5), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1823330
Tempelman, C. and A. Houkes-Hommes, A. (2015). “What Stops Dutch Households from Taking Up Much Needed Benefits?”. Review of Income and Wealth, 62(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12197
Tovar Sánchez, M. A. (2021). “Investigación cualitativa sobre el estigma en PSH”. Trabajo de Fin de Máster. Máster Universitario en Psicología Social. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Septiembre, 2021. https://docisolation-eu.prod.fire.glass/?guid=7a8990d1-f10b-4dd6-158d-b93f8ce1f07c
Whelan, S. (2010) “The take-up of means-tested income support”. Empirical Economics 39: 847-875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0329-z