Interlanguage or Technology when Using English as Vehicular Language: what influences students productions online?

Milagros Torrado-Cespón

doi:10.4995/eurocall.2018.9924

Authors

Milagros Torrado-Cespón Universidad Internacional de La Rioja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2018.9924

Keywords:

interlanguage, English as a vehicular language, ICT, proofreading, corrective feedback

Abstract

This article seeks to explore what influences the production of accurate online written texts in English by speakers of Spanish. In order to do so, the cases where the pronoun “I” is not capitalized have been examined in detail to determine whether we are facing an error due to a lack of proficiency or whether the use of ICT is to blame. After going through the cases of “i” and observing the other mistakes made in the texts where they appear, ICT together with lack of proofreading, and interlanguage seem to be the possible answers. Although we can establish the use of technology and, therefore, Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) as the cause of most cases in analogy with what happens with native speakers, further investigation is needed and new research with similar control groups where explicit corrective feedback is given could give us more clues about the behaviour of the participants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ask.metafilter.com. (2017). Why do so many people always use lower case letters when using the net? Available from http://ask.metafilter.com/43656/Why-do-so-many-people-always-use-lower-case-letters-when-using-the-net

Bever, T. G. (1981). “Normal Acquisition Processes Explain the Critical Period for Language Learning”. In K. C. Diller (ed.), Individual Differences & Universals in Language Learning Aptitude (pp. 176-198). Rowley: Newbury House.

Corder, S. P. (1981). Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford: OUP.

Crystal, D. (2004). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: CUP.

Krauss, M. (1992). The World's Languages in Crisis. Language, 68 (1): 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0075

Ellis, R. (2008). A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types. ELT Journal: 63, 2, 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023

Erdogan, V. (2005). Contribution of Error Analysis to Foreign Language Teaching. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education 2: 261-270.

Lado, R. (1991). Procedures in comparing two grammatical structures. In B.W. Robinett and J. Schachter (eds.), Second Language Learning. Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis and Related Aspects (pp. 15-19). Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

Lado, R. (1990/ 1957). Linguistics Across Cultures. Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799

Magen, A. & Velay, J. (2014). “Cognitive Implications of New Media”. In M. Ryan, L. Emerson, and B. Robertson (eds), The Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media (pp. 73-77). Baltimore: John Hopking University Press.

Omar, A. and Miah, M. (2013). “Digital Evolution of the Written Language”. In Proceedings of the Information Systems Educators Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA. Available from http://www.iscap.us/search/searchedproc?item=k&letOnly=1&word=W.

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL 10: 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209

Selinker, L. (1992). Rediscovering Interlanguage. NY / London: Longman.

Torrado-Cespón, M. & Font-Paz, C. (2016). Interlanguage or Technology? Capitalization in a Learner Corpus of English as a Foreign Language. Opción. Especial 32-12: 784-793.

Torrado-Cespón, M. & Díaz-Lage, J. M. (2017). Error Analysis and Interlanguage in the Use of the Term ‘ICT’ in an Online Learner Corpus. Complutense Journal of English Studies 25: 105-123. https://doi.org/10.5209/CJES.56354

Velay, J. & Longcamp, M. (2012). “Handwriting versus Typewriting: Behavioral and Cerebral Consequences in Letter Recognition”. In M. Torrance, D. Alamargot, M. Castelló, F. Ganier, O. Kruse, A. Mangen, L. Tolchinsky and L. van Waes (eds), Learning to Write Effectively: Current Trends in European Research (pp. 371-373). UK: Emerald.

Wood, C.; Kemp, N.; & Waldron, S. (2014). Exploring the Longitudinal Relationships between the Use of Grammar in Text Messaging and Performance on Grammatical Tasks. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32 (4): 415-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12049

Zelenkauskaite, A. & Gonzales, A.L. (2017). Non-standard typography use over time: signs of a lack of literacy or symbolic capital? The Journal of Community Informatics, 13(1): 72-91.