Electronic Feedback: Pedagogical Considerations for the Implementation of Software

Miguel García-Yeste


As university lecturers, we often struggle to provide our students with good quality feedback in a consistent manner. This is usually caused by the increasing imbalance in teacher-student ratios (Hounsell et al., 2008), as well as the pressure of academic life and the lack of time (Sadler, 2010). In addition, assessment practices should be transparent enough to ensure all students are evaluated in a similar way (O’Donovan et al., 2004), especially when different instructors teach different groups of students taking the same course. This paper, which focuses on designing a feedback scheme that helps instructors to provide good quality feedback in a consistent manner, begins with a needs analysis based on the author’s experience as an instructor of academic writing in English. A literature review follows, focusing on: (a) the scholarship on feedback in higher education; and (b) the research on the use of technology for the provision of feedback. Finally, a feedback scheme is presented, and some guidelines for its implementation are provided.


Formative feedback; literature review; electronic feedback; software; self-regulation

Full Text:



Alesón, M. et al. (2006). "Assessment and online feedback: Using a written text correction programme". Proceedings of the XXIV International AESLA Conference Madrid: UNED.

Cabero, J. (2001). Tecnología educativa. Dise-o y utilización de medios de ense-anza. Barcelona: Paidós.

Carless, D. et al. (2011). "Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices". Studies in Higher Education, 36(4): 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449

Case, S. (2007). "Reconfiguring and realigning the assessment feedback processes for an undergraduate criminology degree". Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3): 285-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600896548

Cumming, A. (1989). "Writing Expertise and Second-Language Proficiency". Language Learning, 39: 81-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00592.x

DiGiovanni, E. and Nagaswami, G. (2001). "Online peer review: an alternative to face-to-face?" ELT journal 55(3): 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.3.263

Hedgcock, J. & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). "Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing". Journal of Second Language Writing 3(2): 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4

Holmes, M. (1996). "Marking student work on the computer." The Internet TESL Journal 2(9).

Hounsell, D. et al. (2008). "The quality of guidance and feedback to students". Higher Education Research & Development 27(1): 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658765

Hyland, F. (2003). "Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback". System 31(2): 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6

Krajka, J. (2002) "Correcting student work with the computer - using dedicated software and a word processor". Teaching English with Technology. A Journal for Teachers of English 2(4) [retrieved from: http://www.iatefl.org.pl/call/j_tech10.htm].

McCune, V., & Hounsell, D. (2005). "The development of students' ways of thinking and practising in three final-year biology courses". Higher Education, 49(3): 255-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6666-0

Mooij, T. (2009). "Education and ICT-based self-regulation in learning: Theory, design and implementation". Education and Information Technologies, 14(1): 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9066-8

Nicol, D. (2006). "Increasing success in first year courses: Assessment re-design, self-regulation and learning technologies". Proceedings of the 23rd annual ascilite conference.

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). "Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice". Studies in higher education, 31(2): 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

O'Donovan, B. et al. (2004). "Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria". Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3): 325-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251042000216642

Perkins, D. (2007). "Theories of difficulty". In Entwistle, N. Student learning and university teaching. BJEP Monograph Series II, Number 4-Student Learning and University Teaching, 1(1): 1-18.

Sadler, D. R. (2010). "Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal". Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5): 535-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015

Thomas, J. (2004). "Using computers in correcting written work". Teaching English with Technology, 4(3): 1-8.

Tuzi, F. (2004). "The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course". Computers and Composition, 21(2): 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003

Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2006). "Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda". Language teaching research, 10(2): 157-180. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr190oa

Abstract Views

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.


Cited-By (articles included in Crossref)

This journal is a Crossref Cited-by Linking member. This list shows the references that citing the article automatically, if there are. For more information about the system please visit Crossref site

1. La enseñanza de la argumentación en la universidad
Esther Lopez
Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación  issue: 20  first page: 249  year: 2020  
doi: 10.15366/ria2020.20.012

Licencia Creative Commons

This journal is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Universitat Politècnica de València

e-ISSN: 1695-2618    http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/eurocall