Speaking Practice Outside the Classroom: A Literature Review of Asynchronous Multimedia-based Oral Communication in Language Learning
Classroom instruction provides a limited amount of quality speaking practice for language learners. Asynchronous multimedia-based oral communication is one way to provide learners with quality speaking practice outside of class. Asynchronous multimedia-based oral communication helps learners develop presentational speaking skills and raise their linguistic self-awareness. Twenty-two peer-reviewed journal articles studying the use of asynchronous multimedia-based oral communication in language learning were reviewed, (1) to explore how asynchronous oral communication has been used to improve learner speaking skills, and (2) to investigate what methodologies are commonly used to measure and analyze language gains from using asynchronous multimedia-based oral communication to improve learner speaking skills. In this study we present three principal findings from the literature. First, asynchronous multimedia-based oral communication has been used in conjunction with a variety of instructional methods to promote language gains in terms of fluency, accuracy and pronunciation. Second, the methods found in this review were technical training, preparatory activities, project-based learning, and self-evaluation with revision activities. Third, the majority of previous studies demonstrating the effectiveness of these methods have relied on learner perceptions of language gains rather than on recordings of learner speech.
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2012). Performance descriptors for language learners. http://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/actfl-performance-descriptors-language-learners
Abuseileek, A. F., & Qatawneh, K. (2013). Effects of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) oral conversations on English language learners’ discourse functions. Computers and Education, 62, 181–190. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.013
Bakar, N. A., Latiff, H., & Hamat, A. (2013). Enhancing ESL learners speaking skills through asynchronous online discussion forum. Asian Social Science, 9(9), 224–234. doi:10.5539/ass.v9n9p224
Baker-Smemoe, W., Dewey, D. P., Bown, J., & Martinsen, R. A. (2014). Does measuring L2 utterance fluency equal measuring overall L2 proficiency? Evidence from five languages. Foreign Language Annals, 47(4), 707–728. doi: 10.1111/flan.12110
Castañeda, M., & Rodríguez-González, E. (2011). L2 speaking self-ability perceptions through multiple video speech drafts. Hispania, 94(3), 483–501.
Clark, R. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29. doi: 10.1152/advan.00094.2010
Clifford, R. (2002). Achievement, performance, and proficiency testing. Paper presented at the Berkeley Language Center Colloquium on the Oral Proficiency Interview, University of California at Berkley.
Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(4), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100008391
Delaney, T. (2012). Quality and quantity of oral participation and English proficiency gains. Language Teaching Research, 16(4), 467–482. doi: 10.1177/1362168812455586
Dixon, E. M., & Hondo, J. (2014). Re-purposing an OER for the online language course: A case study of Deutsch Interaktiv by the Deutsche Welle. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(2), 109–121. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2013.818559
Dona, E., Stover, S., & Broughton, N. (2014). Modern languages and distance education: Thirteen days in the cloud. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.91273
Engin, M. (2014). Extending the flipped classroom model: Developing second language writing skills through student-created digital videos. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(5), 12–26. doi:10.14434/josotlv14i5.12829
Fukushima, T. (2002). Promotional video production in a foreign language course. Foreign Language Annals, 35(3), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb01860.x
Gleason, J. & Suvorov, R. (2012). Learner perceptions of asynchronous oral computer-mediated communication: Proficiency and second language selves. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 100–121.
Goulah, J. (2007). Village voices, global visions: Digital video as a transformative foreign language learning tool. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 62–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02854.x
Gromik, N. A. (2012). Computers & education cell phone video recording feature as a language learning tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 58(1), 223–230. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.013
Graham, C. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In Bonk, C. & Graham, C. (eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer. doi: 10.2307/4022859
Hastie, P., Brock, S., Mowling, C. & Eiler, K. (2012). Third grade students’ self-assessment of basketball dribbling tasks. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 12(4), 427–430. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2012.04063
Hirotani, M. (2009). Synchronous versus asynchronous CMC and transfer to Japanese oral performance. Calico Journal, 26(2), 413–438. doi: 10.1016/j.cpen.2012.02.001
Hirotani, M. & Lyddon, P. A. (2013). The development of L2 Japanese self-introductions in an asynchronous computer-mediated language exchange. Foreign Language Annals, 46(3), 469–490. doi: 10.1111/flan.12044
Hung, S. T. (2011). Pedagogical applications of Vlogs: An investigation into ESP learners’ perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 736–746. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01086.x
Jamshidi, R., LaMasters, T., Eisenberg, D., Duh, Q. Y. & Curet, M. (2009). Video self-assessment augments development of videoscopic suturing skill. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 209(5), 622–625. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.07.024
Karweit, N. (1984). Time on task reconsidered: Synthesis of research on time and learning. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 32–35.
Kirkgöz, Y. (2011). A blended learning study on implementing video recorded speaking tasks in task-based classroom instruction. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 1–13.
Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners’ discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 143–166. doi: 10.1076/0958-8221(200004)13
Kormos, J. & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145–164. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001
Lamy, M.-N. & Goodfellow, R. (1999). “Reflective conversation” in the virtual classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2), 43–61.
Lepore, C. E. (2014). Influencing students’ pronunciation and willingness to communicate through interpersonal audio discussions. Dimension, 73–96.
Lin, H. (2015). Computer-mediated communication (CMC) in L2 oral proficiency development: A meta-analysis. ReCALL, 27(3), 261–287. doi: 10.1017/S095834401400041X
McIntosh, S., Braul, B. & Chao, T. (2003). A case study in asynchronous voice conferencing for language instruction. Educational Media International, 40(1), 63–73. doi: 10.1080/0952398032000092125
Ono, Y., Onishi A., Ishihara M. & Yamashiro M. (2015). Voice-based computer mediated communication for individual practice to increase speaking proficiency: Construction and pilot study. In Zaphiris P. & Ioannou A. (eds.), Learning and collaboration technologies. LCT 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9192. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_12
Pop, A., Tomuletiu, E. A. & David, D. (2011). EFL speaking communication with asynchronous voice tools for adult students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1199–1203. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.262
Sauro, S. & Smith, B. (2010). Investigating L2 performance in text chat. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 554–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq007
Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851357
Shih, R. (2010). Blended learning using video-based blogs: Public speaking for English as a second language students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1048
Sun, Y. C. (2012). Examining the effectiveness of extensive speaking practice via voice blogs in a foreign language learning context. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 494–506. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.494-506
Sun, Y.C. & Yang, F.Y. (2015). I help, therefore, I learn: Service learning on Web 2.0 in an EFL speaking class. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(3), 202–219. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2013.818555
Tiraboschi, T. & Iovino, D. (2009). Learning a foreign language through the media. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 5(3), 133–137.
Tognozzi, E. & Truong, H. (2009). Proficiency and assessment using WIMBA voice technology. Italica, 86(1), 1–23.
Yaneske, E. & Oates, B. (2010). Using voice boards: Pedagogical design, technological implementation, evaluation and reflections. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(8), 233–250. doi: 10.3402/rlt.v18i3.10767
Ziegler, N. (2013). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A research synthesis and meta-analysis (Doctoral dissertation). Washington, DC.
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
- There are currently no refbacks.
Cited-By (articles included in Crossref)
This journal is a Crossref Cited-by Linking member. This list shows the references that citing the article automatically, if there are. For more information about the system please visit Crossref site
1. Teachers' Perception of the Students' Foreign Language Learning and the Potential Role of ICT
María del Carmen Horno Chéliz, Antonio Sarasa Cabezuelo
International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning vol: 9 issue: 2 first page: 1 year: 2019
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Universitat Politècnica de València
e-ISSN: 1695-2618 http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/eurocall