Developing students' listening metacognitive strategies using online videotext self-dictation-generation learning activity
Birjandi, P. & Rahimi, A. H. (2011). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on the listening performance of EFL Students. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 495-517.
Bozorgian, H. (2013). Metacognitive instruction does improve listening comprehension. International Scholarly Research Network. ISRN Education, 1-6.
Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), 227-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586733
Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Coşkun, A. (2010). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Research on Youth and Language, 4(1), 35-50.
Choi, I., Land, S.M. & Turgeon, A.Y. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional science, 33(5-6), 483–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1277-4
Cross, D. R. & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children's metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-06188.8.131.52
Cross, J. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on news videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 151-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168809103446
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906- 911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312031002338
Koch, A. & Echstein, S. G. (1991). Improvement of reading comprehension of physics texts by students' question formulation. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 473-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130410
Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4304_4
Lai, C. & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(4), 317-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.568417
Leveridge, A. N., & Yang, J. C. (2013). Testing learner reliance on caption supports in second language listening comprehension multimedia environments. ReCALL, 25(2), 199-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000074
McGruddy, R. (1998). The effect of listening comprehension strategy training with advanced level ESL students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59 (12), 4416. (UMI No. 9916234).
Montero Pérez, M., Peters, E., & Desmet, P. (2014). Is less more? Effectiveness and perceived usefulness of keyword and full captioned video for L2 listening comprehension. ReCALL: Journal of Eurocall.
O'Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490
O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R. P., & Kupper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 557-584. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586278
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
Ogle, D.M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. Reading Teacher, 39, 564-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.39.6.11
Park, G. P. (2011). The validation process of the SILL: a Confirmatory factor analysis. English Language Teaching. 4(4), 21-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n4p21
Rasouli, M. Mollakhan, K. and Karbalaei, A. (2013).The effect of metacognitive listening strategy training on listening comprehension in Iranian EFL context. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Science, 2(1),115-128.
Ratebi, Z. & Amirian, Z. (2013). Use of metacognitive strategies in listening comprehension by Iranian university students majoring in English: a comparison between high and low Proficient listeners. Journal of Studies in Education, 3(1), 140-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jse.v3i1.2969
Rosenshine, B. Meister, C. & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002181
Smidt, E. & Hegelheimer, V. (2004). Effects of online academic lectures on ESL listening comprehension, incidental vocabulary Acquisition, and strategy use, Computer Assisted Language Learning. 17(5), 517-556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0958822042000319692
Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 515-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515
Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pasternak, D. P., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., Almeqdad, Q., & Demetriou, D. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 63-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9033-1
Sarani, A. and Jabbari, A. (2010). The effect of generative study strategies on EFL learners' reading comprehension and recall of short stories. Proceedings of the3rd international conference of ICT for Language Learning. Italy: Florence.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
Singer, H., & Donlan, D. (1982). Active comprehension: Problem-solving schema with question generation for comprehension of complex short stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 166-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747482
Soonthornmanee, R. (2002). The effect of the reciprocal teaching approach: on the reading comprehension of EFL students. RELC Journal, 33(2), 125-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003368820203300206
Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 387-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02362.x
Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: acquiring successful strategies. English Language Teaching, 53(3),168-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/53.3.168
Yu, F. Y. (2005). Promoting metacognitive strategy development through online question-generation instructional approach. Proceeding of International Conference on Computers in Education, 564-571. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.
Yu. F. Y., Liu, Y. H. & Chan, T. W. (2005). A Web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(4), 337-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703290500062557
Yu, F. Y. (2009). Scaffolding student-generated questions: design and development of a customizable online learning system. Computers in Human Behaviour, 25(5), 1129-1138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.05.002
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
- There are currently no refbacks.
Cited-By (articles included in Crossref)
This journal is a Crossref Cited-by Linking member. This list shows the references that citing the article automatically, if there are. For more information about the system please visit Crossref site
1. Effects of Metacognitive Strategy Training on Chinese Listening Comprehension
Languages vol: 5 issue: 2 first page: 21 year: 2020
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Universitat Politècnica de València
e-ISSN: 1695-2618 http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/eurocall