Investigating the inclusion of online discussions to enhance students' learning in general education undergraduate classes

Authors

  • Cindy Gunn The American University of Sharjah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2010.16330

Keywords:

online discussions, learner autonomy, reflective practice, blended learning

Abstract

Discussion of class material has many educational benefits. In today's modern computerized society, these discussions no longer need to be confined to the classroom setting. This paper discusses students' reactions to the inclusion of online discussions at the undergraduate level. In addition, the author illustrates how the students' comments and concerns have been incorporated over three semesters to improve the assignment for future students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chen, D., Wang, Y., & Hung, D. (2009) A journey on refining rules for online discussion: Implications for the design of learning management systems. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20 (2)157-173.

Bender, T. (2003) Discussion- based online teaching to enhance student learning. Virginia: Stylus Publishing.

Shroff, R., Vogel, D., & Coombes, J. (2008) Assessing individual-level factors supporting student intrinsic motivation in online discussions: A qualitative study. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(1): 111 - 126.

Dolan, K. (2008) Comparing modes of instruction: The relative efficacy of on-line and in-person teaching for student learning PS, Political Science & Politics, 41(2): 387-391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096508080608

Gillespie, J. (2008) Mastering Multimedia: Teaching Languages Through Technology. ReCALL, 20(2): 121-123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000128

Gunn, C. (2009) Exploring the use of online discussions in MATESOL classes. In Gunn, C. (ed.) Exploring TESOL practices in the Arabian Gulf. (pp. 141 - 145). Dubai: TESOL Arabia.

Israelite L & Dunn N, (2003) Designing asynchronous learning. In Piskurich, G. M. (ed.) The AMA handbook of e-learning: effective design, implementation, and technology solutions (pp. 255-270). New York: AMACOM.

Meyer, K. A. (2006) When topics are controversial: Is it better to discuss them face-toface or online? [Electronic version]. Innovative Higher Education, 31. pp. 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9019-3

McLoughlin, D. & Mynard, J. (2009) An analysis of higher order thinking in online discussions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46, 2. pp. 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290902843778

Singh, H. (2003a) Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 44(1): 5-27.

Singh (2003b) Synchronous Collaboration, Live E-learning, and Beyond. In Piskurich, G. M. (ed.) The AMA handbook of e-learning: Effective design, implementation, and technology solutions (pp. 117-130). New York: AMACOM.

Williams, S. W. (2003) Discussion groups and chat: Electronic tools for building online communities. In Piskurich, G. M. (ed.) The AMA handbook of e-learning: Effective design, implementation, and technology solutions (pp. 171-182). New York: AMACOM.

Yu, S. W. (2009) The impact of online discussion on face-to-face discussion and academic achievement. American Secondary Education, 37(2): 4-25.

Downloads

Published

03/15/2010

Issue

Section

Research papers