Online comments as input enhancement
Keywords:online comments, input enhancement, help options, listening comprehension
Chapelle (2003) proposed three general types of input enhancement that help L2 learners “acquire features of the linguistic input that they are exposed to during the course reading or listening for meaning” (p. 40): input salience, input modification, and input elaboration. In 2010, Cárdenas-Claros and Gruba argued that Chapelle’s different types of input enhancement “can be and have been operationalized through help options” primarily utilized in the teaching of reading, listening, writing, grammar, and vocabulary such as glossed words, video/audio control features, captions, subtitles, and grammar explanations (p. 79). As understood from Cárdenas-Claros and Gruba’s classification of help options, input enhancement can only be accomplished through one process: salience, modification, or elaboration. In this article, we argue that YouTube comments have the potential to be (1) a help option that facilitate both listening comprehension of the videos and vocabulary learning and that (2) input enhancement accomplished by comments can be achieved by a combination of different types of input enhancement. Put another way, the aural input of a YouTube video can be salient, modified, and elaborated, thanks to the various types of comments YouTube videos often receive.
Barton, D., and Lee, C. (2013). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. Routledge.
Benson, P. (2015). Commenting to learn: Evidence of language and intercultural learning in comments on YouTube videos. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 88-105. https://doi.org/10125/44435
Bou-Franch, P., Lorenzo-Dus, N., and Blitvich, P. (2012). Social interaction in YouTube text-based polylogues: A study of coherence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(4), 501-521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01579.x
Cárdenas -Claros, M. S. (2005). Field dependence/field independence: How do students perform in CALL-based listening activities? Iowa State University, unpublished MA thesis. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8941&context=rtd
Cárdenas-Claros, M. S., and Gruba, P. A. (2010). Help options in CALL: A systematic review. CALICO Journal, 27(1), 69-90. http://www.jstor.org/stable/calicojournal.27.1.69 https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.1.69-90
Cárdenas-Claros, M. S., and Gruba, P. A. (2013). Decoding the "CoDe": A framework for conceptualizing and designing help options in computer-based second language listening. ReCALL, 25(2), 250-271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000049
Cárdenas-Claros, M. S., and Gruba, P. A. (2014). Listeners' interactions with help options in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 228-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.724425
Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.7
Chen, C. W. Y. (2020). Analyzing online comments: A language-awareness approach to cultivating digital literacies. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(4), 435-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1569068
Cross, J. (2017). Help options for L2 listening in CALL: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 50(4), 544-560. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000209
Dworman, G., and Rosenbaum, S. (2004). Helping users to use help: Improving interaction with help systems. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI '04: CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1717-1718). New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986198
Ellis, R. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.17
Ellison, M. (2007). Embedded user assistance: The future for software help? Interactions, 14(1), 30-31. https://doi.org/10.1145/1189976.1189997
Grgurovic', M., and Hegelheimer, V. (2007). Help options and multimedia listening: Student's use of subtitles and transcripts. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 45-66. https://doi.org/10125/44088
Hegelheimer, V. (1998). Effects of textual glosses and sentence level audio glosses on online reading comprehension and vocabulary recall. University of Illinois, unpublished PhD.
Hegelheimer, V., and Tower, D. (2004). Using CALL in the classroom: Analyzing student interactions in an authentic classroom. System, 32, 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2003.11.007
Hsu, J. F. J. (1994). Computer assisted language learning (CALL): The effect of ESL students' use of interactional modifications on listening comprehension. Iowa State University unpublished PhD.
Jones, L. (2007). Effects of collaboration and multimedia annotations on vocabulary learning and listening comprehension. CALICO Journal, 24(1), 33-58. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v24i1.33-58
Jones, L., and J. Plass (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 546-561. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1192724 https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00160
Jones, G. M., and Schieffelin, B. B. (2009). Talking text and talking back: "My BFF Jill" from boob tube to YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1050-1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01481.x
Kelleher, C., and Paucsh, R. (2005). Stencil-based tutorials: Design and evaluation. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055047
Khan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024
Larsen-Freeman, D., and Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. Longman.
Liou, H. C. (1997). Research of on-line help as learner strategies for multimedia CALL evaluation. CALICO Journal, 14, 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v14i2-4.81-96
Madden, A., Ruthven, I., and McMenemy, D. (2013). A classification scheme for content analyses of YouTube video comments. Journal of Documentation, 69 (5), 693-714. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2012-0078
Oh, S. Y. (2001). Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: Simplification versus elaboration. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 69-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587860
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., and Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 25-36. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.206 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.11
Pujolà, J. T. (2002). CALLing for help: Researching language learning strategies using help facilities in a web-based multimedia program. ReCALL, 14, 235-262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344002000423
Rivens Mompean, A., and Guichon, N. (2009). Assessing the use of aids for computer-mediated tasks: taking notes while listening. JALTCALL Journal, 5, 45-60. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v5n2.79
Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 285-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.x
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
Schultes, P., Dorner, V., and Lehner, F. (2013). Leave a Comment! An In-Depth Analysis of User Comments on YouTube. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 42, 659-673.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011943
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900209
Syodorenko, T. (2010). Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 50-73. https://doi.org/10125/44214
Terantino, J. (2011). YouTube for foreign languages: You have to see this video. Language Learning and Technology, 15(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10125/44231
Tolson, A. (2010). A new authenticity? Communicative practices on YouTube. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2010.511834
Watanabe, Y. (1997). Input, intake, and retention: Effects of increased processing on incidental learning of foreign language vocabulary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(3), 287-307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226319700301X
Willis, M. (2006). Building effective help systems: Modeling human help-seeking behavior. In: Proceedings of the 20th conference of the computer-human interaction special interest group (CHISIG) of Australia on Computer-human interaction: design: Activities, artefacts and environments (pp. 433-436). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1228175.1228266
Winke, P., Gass, S., and Syodorenko, T. (2010). The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 65-86. https://doi.org/10125/44203
Yano, Y., Long, M. H., and Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 25, 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01100.x
YouTube Official Blog (2018). Faster removals and tackling comments - an update on what we're doing to enforce YouTube's Community Guidelines. https://youtube.googleblog.com/2018/12/faster-removals-and-tackling-comments.html
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License