Multimodal and Perceptual Learning Styles: Their Effect on Students’ Motivation in a Digital Environment
The advent of various interactive multimedia networks in the English for Specific Purposes (ESP) classroom (Grabe & Grabe, 2007) has led to the emergence of new learning methodologies (Ming-Hung et al., 2017). Accordingly, new ways of learning are present in a multimodal environment, and have caused an effect on students’ degree of motivation, as well as on their learning styles (e.g., ‘multimodal’ and ‘perceptual’ learning styles).
The present study aims to analyse the degree of motivation of ESP learners with a ‘Multimodal’ learning style in contrast to those with ‘Multiple’ learning styles. In particular, this study addresses three research questions: (1) Has ‘Digital’ learning created a recent ‘perceptual’ learning style (i.e., ‘Multimodal’ learning style)? (2) To what extent does ‘digital’ learning increase ESP students’ motivation in comparison to ‘traditional’ learning? (3) Does the ‘Multimodal’ learning style heighten the degree of motivation in contrast to ‘Multiple’ learning style?
The study used a sample of 62 first-year ESP students taking the subject ‘Professional English for Communicators’ at a Spanish university. Data for this study were collected using ‘Wix’, as the main research tool, and two questionnaires which focused on students’ ‘Multimodal’ learning style and motivation: (a) ‘Multimodal Learning Styles Questionnaire’, designed to help students identify their preferences towards their learning process, and (b) ‘Motivation Questionnaire’, in order to get information regarding students’ perceptions for the enhancement of engagement.
Results suggest that the implementation of ‘Wix’ in the classroom increases students’ engagement in their learning process and fosters a new perceptual learning style (i.e., ‘multimodal’ learning style). These findings may help to identify to what extent digital resources affect students’ engagement and perceptual learning styles’ preferences. The results obtained from this research may be used to derive conclusions on how to approach the ‘Multimodal’ learning style in further student performances with digital tools that promote the training of digital literacies (Girón-García, 2013).
Arbuthnott, K. & Krätzig, G. (2015). Effective teaching: Sensory learning styles versus general memory processes. Innovative Teaching, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.2466/06.IT.4.2
Ceramella, N. & Lee, E. (2013). Cambridge English for the Media. Cambridge: CUP.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: CUP https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667343
Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching elementary student through their individual learning styles. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Dunn, R. & Griggs, S. (1988). Learning styles: quiet revolution in American schools. Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Ellis, R. (2006). «Individual differences in second language learning». In The handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 525-551. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000.ch21
Felder R., Felder G. & Dietz, E. (2002). The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitude. Journal of Engineering Education, 91: 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00667.x
Franzoni, A. & Assar, S. (2009). Student Learning Styles Adaptation Method Based On Teaching Strategies and Electronic Media. Educational Technology & Society, 12: 15-29.
Gargallo-Camarillas, N. & Girón-García, C. (2016). Learning Styles’ Influence in SL/FL Reading. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention. 7(5), 59-76.
Girón-García, C. (2013). Learning Styles and Reading Modes in the Development of Language Learning Autonomy through Cybertasks. Barcelona. Ed. Universitat Jaume I. ISBN: 978-84-695-9179-6. As retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10803/125440
Grabe, M. & Grabe, C. (2007). Integrating Technology for Meaningful Learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Jurado-Navas, A. (2018). Learning Management Systems for Teaching at University Level: Students’ Attitudes and Real Usage in the Classroom. Integrating Information and Communication Technologies in English for Specific Purposes. Ed. Rosa Muñoz-Luna and Lidia Taillefer. Springer. (pp. 79-92). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68926-5_6
Kubischta, F. (2014). Engagement and Motivation: Questioning students on studymotivation, engagement and study strategies. Bachelor Thesis Degree Programme in Sport and Leisure Management. HAAGA-HELIA: University of Applied Sciences. As retrieved from https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/78341/Kubischta%20Frauke%20Final.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Ming-Hung, L., Chen, H. & Liu, K. (2017). A Study of the Effects of Digital Learning on Learning Motivation and Learning Outcome.
Mirhadizadeh, N. (2016). Internal and External Factors in Language Learning. International Journal of Modern Language Teaching and Learning, 1: 188-196.
Moharrer, Z. (2012). A Review on Learning Style Preferences for EFL Language Learners in Online Context. Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow, 12.
Mulalic A., Parilah, M. & Ahmad, F. (2009). Perceptual learning styles of ESL students. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7: 101-113.
Naimie Z., Saedah, S., Abuzaid, R. & Shangholi, R. (2010). Hypothesized Learners' Technology Preferences Based on Learning Style Dimensions. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9: 83-93.
Motivation. (2013). In Psychology Dictionary. Retrieved from https://psychologydictionary.org/motivation/
Olson G., Mark, G., Churchill, E. & Rotman, D. (2010). New missions for sociotechnical infrastructure. Computer, 43: 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2010.321
Pashler, H., Rohrer D., Mcdaniel, M. & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9: 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
Prichard, C. (2013). Using Social Networking Sites as a Platform for Second Language Instruction. TESOL Journal, 4: 752-758. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.113
Pudichery, J. (2003).The Role of Web Technology in Education. Proceedings of the Academy of Educational Leadership, 8.
Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers and Education, 34: 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00044-5
Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3: 130-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.12.001
Vaishnav, R. (2013). Learning Style and Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students. Voice of Research, 1.
Villanueva, M.L. & Navarro, I. (Eds.). (1997). Los Estilos de Aprendizaje de Lenguas. Ed. Universitat Jaume I: Castelló de la Plana.
Wichita, K.S: Wichita, KS: Murdoch Teachers Center. Republished 2003 by WVABE C.I.T.E. Learning Styles Instrument. As retrieved from http://southgwinnetths.com/pdf/Teacher_Links/Learningstylepreference.pdf
Zhang, S. (2002). Students’ perceptions of multimedia classrooms at East Tennessee State University. East Tennessee State University
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM
- There are currently no refbacks.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Universitat Politècnica de València
e-ISSN: 1695-2618 http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/eurocall