ACCESSIBLE ITINERARY THROUGH CÁCERES MONUMENTAL CITY

The monumental area of Caceres city offers a unique framework to plan accessible circuits not only for disabled, but also for blind, deaf or partially sighted people. Together with the cultural and tourist attraction, which led Caceres to be recognized as a World Heritage Site by UNESCO, some other challenges linking to the steep layout and irregular ground should be taken into account. In this context, some necessary actions are recommended and so, a bigger amount of visitors will be allowed to go all over exclusive destinations, even those for whom the access is limited now. This improvement is beneficial for most of the inhabitants, thanks to the guide Design for All: essential for some, useful for all.


INTRODUCTION
Cáceres is one of the World Heritage Sites by UNESCO since 1986, due to the balance of its monumental complex. The medieval look has been preserved by means of respectful interventions, easing the travel to other periods of time without moving from home. The environment eases the tourist attraction and the films, series, documentaries and ads shooting, increasing along the first years of the 20th century.
The elements of the heritage site are made up of city walls and their towers, palaces and religious buildings, spread about a unique net of public places: streets, wall parapets, hills, squares, lookouts and gardens. Empty and tectonic massifs have kept in harmony thanks to some beneficial laws in favor of conservation and mimetic actions imitating the preexisting. In general, the introduction of non-traditional buildings has been avoided, especially dealing with the exterior look of the building .The intervention in the interior has allowed to adapt it to new functions and requests ,not only related to the welfare, but the safety, easing the use change without breaking the image.
A big amount of buildings deserving this heritage declaration are defense elements (city walls, towers), built on a steep topography, that reinforces the purpose of the building itself. This defensive characteristic, located and designed to make difficult the access of non-welcomed people (historically enemies) also means a break for all, especially for those who have limitations in one of their natural, physical, sensory or mental capacities.
The rise of the universal accessibility allows facing the challenges that laying bridge where the barriers are, means. With an added difficulty: a preserved and catalogued environment in which the interventions must respect the preexisting, according to the established needs. In this sense, the proposed interventions must find the balance between opposing needs, some of protection and defense and others of usage and accessibility.
Facing the universal accessibility challenges in a preserved framework means added encouragement in the Design for all (W3C 2020). The introduced improvement will bring benefits to a wider range of public than in the beginning. According to this, proposing a path in which a wheelchair can travel is important (proper width, easy slope and stable pavement) and also that allows walking pedestrians and families with prams, trolleys or shopping carts (frequent situations in a touristic environment) as well as disabled or using canes people for instance: elderly, deaf and blind people. This will also benefit people with brain difficulties as this allows more to focus their attention on the monumental environment than avoiding stumbling. These improvements, essential for some, are useful to all.
Principles of Universal Accessibility and Design for All will be carried out in the monumental complex of Caceres, with two-leveled special features related to heritage considerations: The first level consists of getting the maximum benefit of the current reality. The second level deals with specific intervention proposals, acceptable for the Caceres municipality budget along several years. Notice that, it is essential to have into account that with the invested expenses on the floor and pavement improvement in a year on the old town environment, the proposed accessibility improvement can be faced.
The proposed solutions follow a specific itinerary that starts and finishes in San Juan Square, which can be easily reached from the enlargement urban lung of the city: Paseo de Canovas. Twelve stretches have been settled, on each of them, several cultural highlights deserving attention and justifying the intervention have been defined.

CÁCERES HERITAGE
Inside the world Heritage, there are several cities in Spain declared World Heritage Sites by UNESCO. As well as meaning an honor and an international recognition, it implies also a big responsibility in order to maintain and preserve the old towns from the past, on one hand, and how to restore and make it profitable while living at present facing future, on the other hand. In 1993 the Spanish Group of World Heritage Sites was created (UNESCO Spain 2020). Its aim was to work together in the defense and preservation of the heritage, boosting lifestyles compatible with the recognised protection, assuming the individual richness of each building complex. Caceres identity stamp is the medieval town, within and outside the fortified city walls. The origin of the walls basis is the imperial Rome, visible in its stones and in the archaeological digs surfaced on an Arabic Period layout including the Aljibe, one of the most traditional local landmarks. Rome has left some traces like the camp Cáceres el Viejo, located in the NW of the contemporary town, with no buildings and facing future archaeological digs. The Cave Art exhibits the Maltravieso, Santa Ana and El Conejar caves as the main examples.

CÁCERES DEFENCE
The Medieval Town, apart from the easy-toperceive City Walls that are currently being restored and mean an added value, religious and civil buildings can be visited that have been rebuilt while the town was evolving, with an identity stamp that has preserved the town itself from discordant interventions. In the Middle Ages, City Walls, fortified Houses and towers are thought to be self-preservation elements, protected from the exterior fights as well as from the neighbors, historically grouped in bands on the other side.
An outstanding system of watchtowers can be seen on the City Walls, displaced to the exterior of the axis of the City Walls and connected to them. The group is used mainly to watch and it is the first exterior element of harassment, showing crossfire on the enemy's rearguard. On the other hand, the towers of the fortified houses inside and outside the city walls, consequence of demolitions and refurbishing along History, outline the new urban profile of Caceres.
The origin of the dismantling of towers is the mid of 15th Century, time when there was lot of rivalry among the locals. A drastic reaction is provoked that is transformed into Royal Rules and then, embrasures and arrow holes must be closed as well as battlements had to be eliminated. The towers had to be as high as the rest of the building (Floriano 1917: 53).
The defensive characteristic is then the common in all the elements in the Heritage Complex. That character comes from the years of history: steep floors with strong slopes in order to make difficult to way to all those that were not welcome to the city.
On one hand, the location on a place higher than the surroundings allows to watch the distance from a dominant watchtower as well as to get ready for the defense in advance. The layout of the City Walls stands out the different levels between the interior and the exterior of the walls themselves.
The location of the defensive towers and the election of a group of watchtowers reinforce the idea of refusing intervention from the other side. The inclines produced in the natural soil, the patrol paths and the towers are avoided by means of sloped and uncomfortable stairs as well as with easy-to-remove stepladders, in case of an enemy attack.
On the other hand, the lately selected pavement is much more appropriate for the vehicular traffic, as it allows heavy vehicles (pulled by animals ) to adhere to the floor ,than for regular pedestrians of the 21st Century, even more if they are wearing high heels, if they cannot lean on well or if they have any limiting disabilities, more matter of concern if they wear a raised insole. Fig. 2. The main Square from the walls gate, next to the Palacio de la Generala, outstanding slope inside and outside the City walls (Source: Own, 2017).
In the past, the vehicular surface had finer grains with a layer of sand in order to ease the traffic, nowadays the outer paved lay is not adjusted to healthy and hygiene standards: the traffic is more difficult, on irregular stones of different diameter between 5 and 10 centimeters, it is like a historical floor.

UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY
In Spain, the fact of appearing rules and laws on accessibility to heritage buildings (AENOR 2018) and the interventions around the monumental city in 2019 (San Juan Square, Alzapiernas, Picadero) are boosting the importance of accessibility (physical, sensory and cognitive) not only theoretically but in practice. In contrast with the defense design and the protection from enemy, universal accessibility principles are suggested to be applied, just in a fair proportion.
We mean, in the Spanish building framework, (Ministerio de Fomento 2006), search of the "best adaptation possible", planning "reasonable adjustment " or "alternative solutions" to the ruled needs ,paying attention to the level of improvement desired, being respectful not only with the heritage protection but with the access of the higher number of people possible. It is thought that there are also some other determining factors related to people safety or places preservation in the case of robberies or damages that also limit the access slightly.
For a big amount of population, accessibility is related to the mobility of wheelchairs. In fact, the International Symbol of Accessibility ISA (Rehabilitación Internacional 2020) is a person sitting on a wheelchair, in a schematic way although there are some detractors that refuse it due to its reductionism. It is totally true that the required modifications to adapt the itinerary to ease the travel and access of a wheelchair ,in general, are much more expensive and bulkier (ramps, elevators) and are much more visible than others performed for blind or deaf people or those with intellectual disabilities. Any case, the Universal Accessibility is aimed at everybody.
Nearby the Old City of Caceres, in 2019, some improvement modifications have taken place. The level of success was different but these modifications show the sensitivity of the competent authority and citizens to ease the access of most people to most places. The most remarkable intervention is on Alzapiernas Street, a communicating axis between a car park (docking zone, loading and unloading zone, car park and bus stop) and the Main Square, the entrance to the Old Town.
The discussion provoked with associations of disabled people has caused some interventions in the media and a tender organized by the Colegio Oficial de Arquitectos de Extremadura (COADE 2018), with interesting proposals. A weak line of action is confusing accessibility and mobility. And the proposal of a stretch with escalator is being widely discussed. Related to the previously mentioned intervention there is the elimination of steps on Sánchez Varona Street, an alternative connection of the prior one for wheelchair users.
Nevertheless, as to design a comfortable ramp (under 6% slope) a lot of space is required, two solution itineraries are given: one of them is the current one and the other one is being carried out. The first one is along Moret Street towards San Juan Square, following along Felipe Uribarri Street and Parras Street.
The required improvement means to widen the pavement, which implies to get a critical road width because buses travel around here. The other circuit connects the touristic bus stops at Obispo Galarza Square and Zurbaran Street by means of a ramp. This street also requires the pavement refurbishment relating to the width to pass through, and the bumps in the access to garages.
The emblematic second intervention is San Juan Square. The improvement has consisted of building a single platform respecting most of the existing elements, some of them modified in the previous years.
The result demonstrates a lack of estimation in the connection with the nearby streets, as well as a lack of determination on the delimiting boundary markers: when the area is at the same height: on one hand, the barrier disappears, and on the other hand, the travel of vehicles is allowed without physically limiting the running surface.
The other itinerary connects the same points through the ramp and it implies the adaptation of the width and the bumped access to garages on Zurbaran Street.
The last intervention to highlight is on Picadero Street, which connects Santiago Square and San Blas Neighborhood; it has a difficult floor on the exterior of the city walls, as the prior ones .It was not an important intervention as there is not much car or pedestrian traffic; it is a reference for other interventions inside the city wall.
This consisted of the execution of an only platform with lateral paving, using granite stones, comfortable for pedestrians and wheelchairs; and in the middle, there is a central area with unevenness on the surface, adapted to road traffic.
Priority has been given to the aesthetic criteria of the central area for vehicles; the sides with different width (from 2 meters to and a scarcely 0.5 m) are residual space.
This solution (half a meter width, two feet thick) makes the movement of wheelchairs difficult, (and prams) otherwise the universal accessible option could have been possible and cheap.

DESIGN FOR ALL
Although the study of accessibility has been focused on wheelchair users, the fact is that the improvements are directly beneficial for prams and trolleys when they must be pulled inside the monumental environment because a lot of touristic accommodation has proliferated.
If the barrier for wheelchairs disappears, the doors of the Old Town will be open for young families with babies and the access of tourists with their luggage will be much easier.
Moreover, those improvements for wheelchairs, the floors with the same level of height and the disappearance of obstacles are advantages for blind and partially sighted people, (Gual et al 2018: 28) than can walk safely and have obvious references on their itineraries.
The adaptation regarding the hearing impediments is a plus; up to now, these adaptations can be seen in the interior of some public places but they could also be present in some open areas of the city, especially where vehicles are allowed to run.
The constant technological advances allow glimpsing virtual connection and GPS hearing devices that facilitate accessibility.
The previous actions, clear and clean accessible pedestrian itineraries, mean some improvements for people with intellectual disabilities as the way is at the same height and free of traffic.
A person can frequently have several disabilities at a time so, any improvement makes the accessibility options higher for all. In conclusion, anybody can get profit when the barriers are removed and the accessibility improves. The travel is easy; the risk of tripping, unsafe situations and hesitation disappears.

METHODOLOGY
The general principles for an accessible pedestrian itinerary (API) are applied, from and to San Juan Square bordering the city walls, getting inside the city through Puerta de Merida, on the upper part of the perimeter of the walls. Going along Ancha Street towards the upper part of the itinerary can be accessible with little improvement. The rest of the itinerary needs many more interventions, going down the itinerary along the parapet, beside the Walls, along Manga Street down to Santa Maria Square. The itinerary to The Main Square is a beaten track as it is on the axis to get in and out the Old Town. The last stretch to San Juan Square, although with quite an important slope, has regular ground. The alternative itinerary is along Pintores Street, with a little slope. The ground is not flat at all and it is quite difficult for wheelchairs.
This itinerary is divided into 12 stretches using the nomenclature used on some current paperwork for the Geographical Information System (GIS) of Caceres Council, published through the Visor de Patrimonio Arquitectonico (Caceres Council 2020). The stretches needing punctual intervention are accompanied by one or several index cards, known as "CCIPANNNN" (CC is for Cáceres, IPA is for Itinerario Peatonal Accesible-Accesible Pedestrian Itinerary, NNNN is for a four-figure ordinal number) that contain physical location, plans and photos of the place, schematic elevations that show the ground slope and a data breakdown that allow to observe the critical points and the proposed solutions: stretch width, floor surface finish, longitudinal slope, time reference of the measures taken, level of accessibility, proposal of improvement with a global evaluation and the impact of the intervention.
On some stretches, the general situation is mentioned and then, the intervention should be more important and expensive, an objective unconnected to this proposal of a particular design, compatible with some more ambitious interventions.Each of the stretches will be shown with the recognizable and remarkable boundary markers, followed by an intervention proposal based on the critical situation detected, with an extract of the necessary file cards.

STRETCHES AND MARKERS RESULTS
Twelve file cards are shown, with stretches of street along the itinerary, where the ground floor with its graphic scale is shown (Saumell 2016: 85), an image of the place. the elevation of one of the street views on that stretch with and approximate slope shown by little arrows separated the distance equivalent to one small feet (four feet equals one meter in this case), each arrow represents a point higher than the previous one (the arrowhead is the highest point of the arrow), showing the elevation gain.
Finally, we offer an estimated budget of the intervention.  On that stretch, apart from needing the cut stones in some parts, a handrail is required, due to the steep slope and on the lower stretch, opposite Palacio de la Generala, the pavement needs some readjustment, not only on the stones, but on the transversal slope in order to avoid the wheelchair overturning: the proposed solution will mean a light bump which will affect the vehicular traffic, facilitating the moderation of speed in one of the key entrance points to the walled enclosure. At the entrance of the square, a partial paving is required up to the slate covered ground, which could be a way to improve the surface inequalities to facilitate the wheels movement of a pram or wheelchair as well as the walk with high heels because this is a "wedding area" and place for the celebration of other civil and religious events. From Santa Maria Square, the Arco de la Estrella (CCIPA0010) is approached; a gate of Churriguera with a unique layout, to facilitate to entrance of carts to the wall enclosure.
The Toledo-Moctezuma Palace and the back yard of the Mayoralgo Palace keep some Roman remains to be visited but with restricted access.
The Arco de la Estrella forms the gate of the wall from the Main Square (CCIPA0011). On wall the Tower of Bujaco, Torre de los Púlpitos and Torre de la Yebra, can be observed as well as its characteristic arcades and a recent refurbishment, which means a passable pavement for all. The itinerary is completed with the Gran Via (CCIPA0012), around San Juan Square, in a circular circuit.
The slope is hard but the paved floor facilitates the walk. As an alternative, with a softer slope, people can go along Pintores Street, although the ground, with granite old stones, provokes frequent bumping when using the wheelchairs.

CONCLUSIONS
The proposals of improvement, which are summarized in actions of revision of seals and slopes, low cost actions and removing stone pavement, all of these are looking for the good circulation of the wheelchairs and prams. This is an improvement for all and stumbling is avoided. These operations can be completed with punctual pivots and bins swapping as well as some slope adjustment to avoid lateral rollover of the wheelchair.
The broad terms assessment of the suggested actions makes easier its effectiveness, and also makes it possible. In this sense, it results profitable as a starting point for other accessible itineraries proposed with the start and finish in San Juan Square along Moret Street into La Concepcion Square, Santo Domingo Church and Santiago Church, one of the most interesting buildings in the Old Town of Caceres, out the City Wall of the monumental complex.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Thanks to Mercedes and Maria José, due to their valuable help as they tried the itineraries on their respective wheelchairs. Thanks to Government of Extremadura and European Fund for the Regional Development of the European Union for the grant GR18198 to Group TPR013 and to Consejería de Educación y Empleo of Junta de Extremadura for teaching and researching mobility grant.
Aplicamos los principios de accesibilidad universal y diseño para todos en el conjunto monumental de Cáceres con las peculiaridades inherentes a su consideración patrimonial a dos niveles. Un primer nivel consiste en sacarle el máximo partido a la realidad del momento. Un segundo nivel aborda propuestas de intervención concretas, asumibles dentro del presupuesto corriente de la municipalidad de Cáceres, a lo largo de varios años. Tenemos en cuenta que con el gasto invertido en las actuaciones de mejoras de pavimentación y acerado en un ejercicio anual en el entorno de la ciudad monumental se podrían afrontar las mejoras de accesibilidad propuestas.
Las soluciones planteadas siguen un itinerario preciso, que empieza y termina en la plaza de San Juan, a la que se puede llegar con relativa facilidad desde el pulmón del ensanche urbano que es el Paseo de Cánovas. Se han establecido doce tramos, bien reconocibles sobre el plano, y en cada uno de los tramos se han fijado cuatro o cinco hitos culturales que merecen la atención y que justifican la actuación.

DISEÑO PARA TODOS
Aunque se ha focalizado el estudio de la accesibilidad prioritariamente a usuarios de silla de ruedas, las mejoras resultan beneficiosas de modo directo para los carritos de bebé y el traslado de equipajes sobre ruedas, cada vez más frecuentes en entornos monumentales con proliferación de alojamientos y apartamentos turísticos. Si se levanta la barrera de la accesibilidad para las sillas de ruedas, se abre la puerta del conjunto monumental a familias jóvenes con niños pequeños y se facilita el acceso confortable de turistas y visitantes con equipaje.

METODOLOGÍA
Aplicamos los principios generales expuestos a un itinerario peatonal accesible (IPA) circular que parte y regresa a la plaza de San Juan. Desde allí bordea la muralla, con incorporación al interior del recinto por la puerta de Mérida, en la cota superior del perímetro de la muralla. La continuación por la calle Ancha hasta la cota más alta del itinerario resulta accesible con pequeñas mejoras. La continuación del recorrido requiere mayores actuaciones, aunque sea en sentido descendente en gran parte del itinerario por el adarve junto a la muralla y por la calle del Mono y por la calle Manga hasta la plaza de Santa María. La conexión con la plaza Mayor sigue el itinerario más transitado como eje de entrada y salida al conjunto monumental. El último tramo hasta la plaza de San Juan, a pesar de contar con una pendiente pronunciada, presenta un pavimento regular. El itinerario alternativo por la calle Pintores, de pendiente más amable, adolece de excesivas discontinuidades en el pavimento que suponen un importante inconveniente para la circulación en silla de ruedas.
Partimos de la Plaza de San Juan (CCIPA0001), a la que se puede llegar desde el Paseo de Cánovas por la calle San Antón y San Pedro, y desde la Plaza de Galarza por la calle Parras, además de contar con una parada de taxis en las inmediaciones (Gran Vía). El hito principal es la Iglesia de San Juan de los Ovejeros. Por la calle Sergio Sánchez se llega a la calle Pizarro (CCIPA0002) con el Museo Helga de Alvear, con una reciente intervención de Emilio Tuñón (Fundación Helga de Alvear 2020), llegando a la puerta de Mérida (CCIPA0003).
Si el itinerario hasta este momento solamente requiere algún ajuste de desigualdades en el pavimento y ligeros desniveles producidos por el paso de vehículos, ahora se requiere ya mayor intervención con una renovada pavimentación con empedrado careado (cuidando la ejecución para que las piedras ofrezcan una cara lisa a la pisada) donde aparece empedrado de incómoda circulación. Los hitos que nos encontramos son la ermita de la Soledad, el convento de Santa Clara, la torre conocida como Torremochada de la muralla a la vista y varios palacios intramuros, pues la Puerta de Mérida supone la transición hacia el interior del recinto amurallado. La calle Ancha (CCIPA0004) conecta la Puerta de Mérida con la plaza de San Mateo, disfrutando del Parador, antiguo palacio señorial del Comendador de Alcuéscar, como la Escuela de Artes y Oficios, y dos intervenciones más de Emilio Tuñón en la restauración en otros dos palacios. El itinerario resulta asequible, aumentando el acabado superficial amable rehaciendo el empedrado en algunos tramos. Llegados a la Plaza de San Mateo (CCIPA005) nos situamos en la cota más alta de la ciudad monumental, con la Iglesia que da nombre a la plaza, en convento de San Pablo y los palacios de las Cigüeñas y de la Veletas, sedes militar y museística respectivamente. Este tramo también requiere pavimentación careada del empedrado para facilitar la circulación en silla de ruedas. Dirigiéndonos por la calle Condes (CCIPA006) llegamos a la Puerta de Santa Ana con necesidad de aumentar la superficie pavimentada sin desigualdades. Desde San Mateo observamos la Torre de Sande, la Casa del Sol, el Palacio de los Golfines de Arriba y la Casa Mudéjar asomándose a la Cuesta de Aldana, ligeramente fuera del recorrido. Al llegar a la Puerta de Santa Ana tomamos un tramo del adarve o calle paralela a la muralla por su interior (CCIPA0007), con la Torre albarrana del Postigo junto a la mencionada puerta de la muralla, la Torre del Horno a una cota inferior y el Palacio de la Generala. En ese tramo, además de requerir carear el empedrado en varios tramos, requiere un pasamanos debido a la pronunciada pendiente y, en su tramo inferior, frente al Palacio de la Generala, un reajuste del pavimento con empedrado careado y estudio y rectificación de la pendiente transversal para evitar el vuelco de la silla de ruedas: se propone una solución que supondrá un ligero badén afectando al tráfico rodado, y facilitando la moderación de la velocidad en uno de los puntos clave de entrada al recinto intramuros. La plaza de los Caldereros muestra fachada del mencionado Palacio de la Generala y Palacio de los Ribera, ambos sede del Rectorado de la Universidad de Extremadura. Desde esa plaza se inicia un itinerario por la calle del Mono y calle Manga (CCIPA0008) que demanda carear parte del empedrado ampliando la anchura del pavimento continuo de losas y requiere un ligero ajuste de la pendiente transversal en el cruce de la calle Manga. En ese tramo encontramos la Casa del Mono, el Palacio de los Becerra y la Iglesia de San Francisco Javier. Llegamos a otro de los núcleos emblemáticos de la ciudad monumental, la plaza de Santa María (CCIPA0009) con el Palacio de los Golfines de Abajo, la Concatedral o iglesia mayor de Santa María, y los Palacios de Mayoralgo y de Galarza, entre los más emblemáticos. A la llegada a la plaza se necesita un nuevo careado parcial del empedrado, hasta llegar al enlosado de pizarra, que podría servir con un repaso de las desigualdades superficiales para facilitar el movimiento de las ruedas en la silla o carrito, facilitando también el paso con tacones en lugar habitual de celebración de bodas y otras celebraciones civiles y religiosas. Desde la plaza de Santa María llegamos al Arco de la Estrella (CCIPA0010), con esta puerta de Churriguera de trazado peculiar para facilitar la entrada de carruajes al recinto intramuros. Vemos el Palacio Toledo Moctezuma y el patio trasero del palacio de Mayoralgo conserva restos de época romana musealizados aunque con acceso restringido. El Arco de la Estrella conforma la puerta de la muralla desde le Plaza Mayor (CCIPA0011), con las torres de Bujaco, de los Púlpitos y de la Yerba, sus característicos soportales y una remodelación reciente, lo que supone un pavimento transitable para todos. El recorrido se completa con la Gran Vía (CCIPA0012), que flanquea el ayuntamiento y desemboca de nuevo en la Plaza de san Juan, completando un recorrido circular. La pendiente es elevada, pero el pavimento asfaltado facilita el paso. Como alternativa de pendiente más suave contamos con la calle Pintores, aunque su pavimento de losas de granito antiguas y redondeadas provoca frecuentes saltos a la silla de ruedas.

CONCLUSIONES
Las mejoras propuestas, que se resumen en revisar juntas y desniveles, operación de bajo coste, y aumento de superficie de enlosado de granito, busca facilitar la circulación en silla de ruedas y en carrito de bebé, suponiendo una mejora para todos, evitando los tropiezos. Esas operaciones se completan con desplazamientos puntuales de pivotes y papeleras y un par de ajustes de pendiente, para evitar el vuelco lateral de la silla de ruedas. La valoración grosso modo de las operaciones planteadas facilita su operatividad y ayuda a hacerlo posible. En ese sentido resulta rentable como punto de partida para otros itinerarios accesibles, como el planteado desde el mismo origen y final en la plaza de San Juan por la calle Moret a la plaza de la Concepción, iglesia de Santo Domingo e Iglesia de Santiago, uno de los edificios más interesantes del conjunto monumental de Cáceres, extramuros del conjunto monumental.

AGRADECIMIENTOS
Se agradece a Mercedes y María José, por su valiosa ayuda en la prueba del recorrido sobre sus respectivas sillas de ruedas y a la Junta de Extremadura y al Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional de la Unión Europea con la ayuda GR18198 al Grupo TPR013, y a la Consejería de Educación y Empleo de la Junta de Extremadura por la Beca de Movilidad como Personal Docente e Investigador de la Universidad de Extremadura.