Internet y su repercusión en la autopercepción individual del bienestar



Palabras clave:

Uso de Internet, Bienestar, sociodemográfico, ESS


Vivimos en una sociedad conectada, donde el uso de Internet ha crecido considerablemente en los últimos años, y se espera siga creciendo aún más a lo largo y ancho del mundo. Como consecuencia, está cambiando el modo en el que las personas nos relacionamos con los demás, pero también con nosotros mismos, e incluso nuestra propia percepción de nuestra propia identidad y bienestar.

El presente trabajo pretende analizar la influencia de determinados aspectos sociodemográficos en el uso de internet y su impacto en la percepción del bienestar de las personas.

Así, tomando los datos de la European Social Survey se ha analizado la relación entre el uso de internet y la percepción de bienestar- medida a través de autoevaluaciones de nivel de felicidad y satisfacción con la vida de las personas incluidas en la encuesta. Además, factores sociodemográficos tales como edad, género, nivel de ingresos o país también han sido evaluados. Tras aplicar distintos análisis estadísticos los resultados concluyen, entre otros, que las personas que no han utilizado  previamente internet incrementan su bienestar al incrementar su frecuencia de uso. . Y también que el uso de internet influye de forma distinta en las personas dependiendo de sus características sociodemográficas.  Se presentan los resultados y conclusiones adicionales para su discusión.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

J. Felix Lozano, Universitat Politècnica de València


Sabrina Femenia Mulet, Universitat Politècnica de València



Argyle, Michael. (2013). The psychology of happiness. Routledge. Argyle, M. (2001). The psicology of hapiness. Incompletaincomplete.

Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars (2013). The Impacts of Social Value, Cognitive Factors and Well-Being on the Use of the Internet of Things and Smart Connected Objects.

Barney, Darin. (2004). The network society (Vol. 2). Polity.

Blank, Grant, & Groselj, Darja. (2016, March). Dimensions of Internet use: amount, variety, and types. In Current Research on Information Technologies and Society: Papers from the 2013 Meetings of the American Sociological Association (p. 27). Routledge.

Carr, Nicholas. (2011), ¿Qué está haciendo internet con nuestra mente? Superficiales, Madrid, Taurus.

Castell, Manuel, (1996), La era de la información. Vol 1. La sociedad red, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.

Castellacci, Fulvio, & Tveito, Vegard. (2018). Internet use and well-being: A survey and a theoretical framework. Research Policy, 47(1), 308-325.

De los Santos, Gerardo. E.; de los Santos Jr., Alafredo G. & Milliron, Mark David. (Eds.). (2001). Access in the information age: Community college bridging the digital divide. Mission Viejo, CA: League for Innovation in the Community College

Diener, Edward & Biswas-Diener, Robert. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being?. Social indicators research, 57(2), 119-169.

Diener, Ed, Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being. Handbook of positive psychology, 16(2), 63-73.

Diener, Edward; Suh, Eunkook M.; Lucas, Richard E., & Smith, Heidi L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological bulletin, 125(2), 276.

DiMaggio, Paul; Hargittai, Eszter; Celeste, Coral, & Shafer, Steven (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. Social inequality, 355-400.

Djankov, Simon; Nikolova, Elena & Zilinsky, Jan. (2016). The happiness gap in Eastern Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44(1), 108-124.

Easterlin, Richard A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89-125).

Easterlin, Richard A. (2010). Happiness, growth and the life cycle. Europe Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 395-398.

Easterlin, Richard A. (2013). Happiness, growth, and public policy. Economic Inquiry, 51(1), 1-15.

Ferro, Enrico; Helbig, Natalie C., & Gil-Garcia, J. Ramón. (2011). The role of IT literacy in defining digital divide policy needs. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 3-10.

Filmus, Yuval. (2010). Two proofs of the central limit theorem. Recuperado de http://www. cs. toronto. edu/yuvalf/CLT. pdf.

Fortin, Nicole; Helliwell, John F., & Wang, Shun. (2015). How does subjective well-being vary around the world by gender and age. World happiness report, 42-75

Frey, Bruno S. (2018). Happiness Can Be Measured. In Economics of Happiness (pp. 5-11). Springer, Cham.

Goslee, Susan & Conte, Chris. (1998). Losing ground bit by bit: Low-income communities in the information age. Benton Foundation.

Graham, Carol & Pozuelo, Julia R. (2017). Happiness, stress, and age: How the U curve varies across people and places. Journal of Population Economics, 30(1), 225-264.

Grinstead, Charles Miller & Snell, James Laurie (1997). Introduction to probability. 1997. American Mathematical Society.

Gross, Elisheva F.; Juvonen, Jaana & Gable, Shelly L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of social issues, 58(1), 75-90

Gunkel, David J. (2003). Second thoughts: toward a critique of the digital divide. New media & society, 5(4), 499-522.

Haidt, Jonathan (2006), The Happiness Hypothesis. Finding modern Truth in Ancient Wirsdom, Basic Books, New York.

Huang, Chiungjung. (2010). Internet use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 241-249.

Huppert, Felicia A. & So, Timthy. (2009, July). What percentage of people in Europe are flourishing and what characterises them. In IX ISQOLS Conference.

Judge, Timothy A., Thoresen, Carl J., Bono, Joyce E., & Patton, Gregory K. (2001). The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.

Kahneman, Daniel & Deaton, Angus (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 107(38), 16489-16493

Levin, RichardI. & Rubin, David S. (2004). Estadística para administración y economía.Pearson Educación, pp.338.

Lissitsa, Sabina & Chachashvili-Bolotin, Svetlana (2016). Life satisfaction in the internetage–Changes in the pastdecade. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 197-206.

Lyubomirsky Sonja; King, Laura & DienerEdward (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect:does happiness lead to success? Psychol Bull 2005;131(6):803–855.

Naiman, Robert J.; Melillo, Jerry M.; Lock, Maurice. A., & Reice, Seth. R. (1987). Longitudinal patterns of ecosystemprocesses and community structure in a subarctic river continuum. Ecology, 68(5), 1139-1156.

Norris, Pippa. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press.

Nowland, Rebecca; Necka, Elizabeth A. & Cacioppo, John T. (2018). Loneliness and social internet use: pathways to reconnection in a digital world?. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(1), 70-87.

OECD(2000b). Schoolingfor tomorrow: Learningto bridgethe digital divide. Paris:Author.

OECD (2013). SkillsOutlook 2013:First Resultsfrom the Survey ofAdult Skills.”Programme for the InternationalAssessment ofAdult Competencies (PIAAC).

OECD (2017).Key Issues for Digitaltransformation in the G20.

Pal, Devika. (2017). Relationship between problematicinternet use and psychological wellbeing among adolescents inSweden.

Pavot, William & Diener, Edward. (1993).The affective andcognitive context ofself-reported measures of subjectivewell-being. Social Indicators Research, 28(1), 1-20.

Pavot, William& Diener,Edward. (2009). Review of thesatisfaction with life scale. In Assessing well-being(pp. 101-117). Springer, Dordrecht.

Pednekar, Neha Kishor & Tung, Suninder (2017). Problematic internet use in adolescents: Roleof identity styles,emotional autonomy, attachment, family environment and well-being. Indian Journal of Health & Wellbeing, 8(4).

Quintana, David; Cervantes, Alejandro; Sáez, Yago & Isasi, Pedro. (2018). Internet use and psychological well-being at advanced age: Evidence from the English longitudinal study of aging. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(3), 480

Riff, Carol D. (2017), “Eduaimonic well-being, inequality, and health: Recent findings and future directions”, Int. Rev. Econo. 2017 June: 64 (2) 159-178.

Seligman, M. E. (2004). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Simon and Schuster.

Seligman, Martin. E. P. (2002). Authentic Happiness. New York: Free Press.

Seligman, Martin (2011). Flourish. New York: Free Press. pp. 16–20. ISBN 9781439190760.

Stanton, Catherine. (2008). The Central Limit Theorem: Java Probability Applets. Accessed at, Accessed January 2008.

Tripathi, Gautani & Ahad, Mohd Abdul (2017). Impact of excessive use of internet on cognitive development of youngsters. International Journal of Information Technology, 9(3), 281-286.

Twenge, Jean M., Sherman, Rine A., & Lyubomirsky, Sonja. (2016). More happiness for young people and less for mature adults: Time period differences in subjective well-being in the United States, 1972–2014. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), 131-141.

Van Deursen, A.lexander & Van Dijk, Jan.(2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New media & society, 13(6), 893-911.

Van Dijk, Teun A.(2013). News as discourse. Routledge.

Veenhoven, Ruut. (1991). Questions on happiness: Classical topics, modern answers, blind spots. Subjective well-being: Aninterdisciplinaryperspective, 2, 7-26.

Veenhoven, Ruut. (2013). The four qualities of life ordering concepts and measures of the goodlife. In The exploration of happiness (pp. 195-226). Springer Netherlands.

Vittersø, Joar; Søholt, Yngvil;Hetland, Audun & Røysamb,Espen. (2010).Was Hercules happy? Some answers from a functional model of human well-being. Social Indicators Research, 95(1), 1.