Examining sociodemographic factors of life satisfaction and happiness perception based on ESS 2016 data

Sabrina Femenia Mulet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/citecma.2020.11950

Resumen

El presente trabajo pretende analizar aspectos sociodemográficos tales como: género, edad, nivel educativo, recursos económicos, o diferencias entre países, realativos al uso de Internet, así como su impacto en la percepción del Bienestar, tomando los datos de la European Social Survey –anualidad 2016. Se ha analizado la percepción del Bienestar, a  través  de  autoevaluaciones de nivel de felicidad y satisfacción con la vida de las personas incluidas en la encuesta. Se han aplicado distintos análisis estadísticos como el ANOVA test de un factor, (P-value 0.000), test post-hoc de Bonferroni-Tukey, o el test de comparación de proporciones entre columnas cuando ha sido necesario. La originalidad de este estudio recae en el tamaño de la muestra y datos recientes. Existen múltiples estudios que analizan este concepto, aunque generalmente presentan menor tamaño de muestra. Así pues, este estudio pretende contrastar investigaciones previasy ofrecer resultados interesantes en relación con las desigualdades entre países o fuente de ingresos. Se presentan resultados y conclusiones para su discusión.

Palabras clave

Bienestar; satisfacción con la vida; felicidad; medidas; sociodemográfico; ESS

Texto completo:

PDF EN

Referencias

Abdallah, S., & Mahony, S. (2012). WP2-Task 2: Stock-taking of Subjective Well. New Economics Foundation.

Afradi, N., Asghari, B., & Manie, F. M. (2017). "Relation ship between dependence on modern communication tools and psychological well-being in students". In Journal of Research & Health, 7(1), 637-646. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jrh.7.1.637

Argyle, M. (2001). The psicology of hapiness.(2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Routledge

Arrosa, M. L., & Gandelman, N. (2016). "Happiness decomposition: Female optimism". In Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(2), 731-756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9618-8

Bartolini, S., & Bilancini, E. (2010). "If not only GDP, what else? Using relational goods to predict the trends of subjective well-being". In International Review of Economics, 57(2), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-010-0098-1

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). "Subjective well-being" in Snyder, López Handbook of positive psychology,16(2), 63-73.

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). "Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress". Psychological bulletin, 125(2), 276. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276

Djankov, S., Nikolova, E., & Zilinsky, J. (2016). "The happiness gap in Eastern Europe". Journal of Comparative Economics, 44(1), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.10.006

Easterlin, R. A. (1974). "Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence". In Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89- 125). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7

Easterlin, R. A. (2010). "Happiness, growth and the life cycle". Europe Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 395-398.

Easterlin, R. A. (2013). "Happiness, growth, and public policy". Economic Inquiry, 51(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00505.x

Fortin, N. I. C. O. L. E., Helliwell, J. F., & Wang, S. H. U. N. (2015). "How does subjective well-being vary around the world by gender and age". World happiness report, 42-75.

Frey, B. S. (2018). "Happiness Can Be Measured". In Economics of Happiness(pp. 5-11). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75807-7_2

Graham, C., & Pozuelo, J. R. (2017). "Happiness, stress, and age: How the U curve varies across people and places". Journal of Population Economics, 30(1), 225-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-016-0611-2

Huppert, F. A., & So, T. (2009, July). "What percentage of people in Europe are flourishing and what characterises them". In IX ISQOLS Conference.

Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). "Relationship of core self-evaluations traits-self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability-with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis". Journal of applied Psychology, 86(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80

Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono,J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001).The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376

Layard, R. (2011). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. Penguin UK.

Lyubomirsky S, King L, Diener E (2005). "The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success?"Psychol Bull2005;131(6):803-855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803

Nowland, R., Necka, E. A., & Cacioppo, J. T.(2018). "Loneliness and social internet use: pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspectives"ion Psychological Science, 13(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617713052

OECD (2016). Education at Glance 2016

OECD (2018). Education at Glance 2018

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). "The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being". Social Indicators Research, 28(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01086714

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009). "Review of the satisfaction with life scale". In Assessing well-being(pp. 101-117). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_5

Seligman, M. E. (2004). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Simon and Schuster.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic Happiness. New York: Free Press.Seligman, Martin (2011). Flourish. New York: Free Press. pp.16-20. ISBN9781439190760.

Stanton, C. (2008). The Central Limit Theorem: Java Probability Applets. Accessed at http://www.math.csusb.edu/faculty/stanton/probstat/clt.html, Accessed January 2008.

Stevenson, B., and J. Wolfers (2008)."Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox". Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1: 1-87 https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.0.0001

Twenge, J. M., Sherman, R. A., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2016). "More happiness for young people and less for mature adults: Time period differences in subjective well-being in the United States, 1972-2014". Social Psychological and Personality Science,7(2), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615602933

Veenhoven, R. (1991). Questions on happiness: Classical topics, modern answers, blind spots. Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective, 2, 7-26.

Veenhoven, R. (2013). "The four qualities of life ordering concepts and measures of the good life". In The exploration of happiness(pp. 195-226). SpringerNetherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5702-8_11

Vittersø, J., Søholt, Y., Hetland, A., Thoresen, I. A., & Røysamb, E. (2010). "Was Hercules happy? Some answers from a functional model of human well-being". Social Indicators Research, 95(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9447-4

Abstract Views

2806
Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Bookmark and Share

 

Citado por (artículos incluidos en Crossref)

This journal is a Crossref Cited-by Linking member. This list shows the references that citing the article automatically, if there are. For more information about the system please visit Crossref site

1. Household Happiness and Fuel Poverty: a Cross-Sectional Analysis on Turkey
Meltem Ucal, Simge Günay
Applied Research in Quality of Life  año: 2021  
doi: 10.1007/s11482-020-09894-3



Licencia de Creative Commons

Esta revista se publica bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional

Universitat Politècnica de València

e-ISSN: 2530-7924   https://doi.org/10.4995/citecma