• Register
  • Login
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers list
  • Policies
    • Open Access Policy
    • Digital preservation policy
    • Authorship policy
    • Research data policy
    • Funding sources policy
    • Publications Ethics and Best Practice
    • Peer Review Process
    • Plagiarism Policy
  • Impact
  • About
    • Focus and Scope
    • Publication Frequency
    • Contact
    • Publisher
    • Journal History
    • Privacy Statement
  • Guides
  • Register
  • Login
Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management
WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management

 

JIF 2024: 1.1
JCI 2024: 0.23
   
   

Show more

Submit article
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
    • Editorial Board
    • Reviewers list
  • Policies
    • Open Access Policy
    • Digital preservation policy
    • Authorship policy
    • Research data policy
    • Funding sources policy
    • Publications Ethics and Best Practice
    • Peer Review Process
    • Plagiarism Policy
  • Impact
  • About
    • Focus and Scope
    • Publication Frequency
    • Contact
    • Publisher
    • Journal History
    • Privacy Statement
  • Guides
  1. Home /
  2. Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

WPOM will select its articles following a double blind, peer review process. Once the editorial team has checked that the contribution follows the formatting and content author guidelines, it is sent to two anonymous reviewers. Grounded on reviewer's recommendations, the editor will communicate the results of the evaluation to the corresponding author. The editor will communicate the overall result of the evaluation (rejected, accepted or accepted with modifications), including the reviewer's comments. If the paper has been accepted with modifications, authors should send back to the journal a new version of the article, that will be reviewed again by the same team of reviewers. Moreover, the authors can attach a letter to the editor, which should indicate the modifications made in the article following the editor's and reviewer's comments. If the authors decide not to follow a particular reviewer's instruction, they can expose in the same letter their reasons for not doing so.

Indexed

 

 

 

Most read PDF (180 days)
  • Protocol: Triple Diamond method for problem solving and design thinking. Rubric validation
    283
  • Application of Overall Equipment Effectiveness In Increasing Productivity: Case Of Textile Company
    259
  • The Horeca Supply Chain: An analysis of the Food and Loss Waste Management literature characteristics
    229

 
 This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 Universitat Politècnica de València

 e-ISSN: 1989-9068    https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom

Nuestras revistas
  • Arquitectura
  • Arte y Arqueología
  • Ciencias
  • Economía y Negocios
  • Educación y Derecho
  • Lingüística
Guías
  • Registro e inicio de sesión
  • Enviar un artículo
  • El editor asigna un revisor
  • Pasos del revisor
¿Necesitas ayuda?
  • Contacto de soporte técnico

2025 Universitat Politècnica de València

  • Política de privacidad