Una propuesta metodológica para la realización de búsquedas sistemáticas de bibliografía (A methodological proposal for the systematic literature review)

Authors

  • Carmen Medina-Lopez Universidad de Sevilla
  • Juan A. Marin-Garcia Universitat Politècnica de València
  • Rafaela Alfalla-Luque Universidad de Sevilla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v1i2.786

Keywords:

metodología, búsqueda bibliográfica, revisión sistemática de la literatura, investigación sobre docencia, dirección de producción y operaciones, methodology, systematic literature review, educational research, production and operations managemen

Abstract

El presente trabajo pretende ser una guía para la realización de búsquedas sistemáticas de bibliografía que sirvan para conocer en profundidad un determinado campo de estudio, desarrollar un marco teórico y establecer las hipótesis adecuadas sobre las que centrar la investigación. Con tal objetivo hemos buscado concretar las acciones a realizar en diferentes fases, que han quedado definidas en cinco etapas a seguir en este proceso: identificación del campo de estudio y del período a analizar, selección de las fuentes de información, realización de la búsqueda (qué, dónde y cómo),  gestión y depuración de los resultados de la búsqueda  y análisis de los resultados. Cada una de las ellas han sido descritas con detalle y ejemplificadas sobre la base de nuestra propia experiencia. Dada la importancia que la búsqueda sistemática de bibliografía tiene en la investigación, resultan de interés trabajos como el que presentamos, que ayudan a realizar esta actividad mejorando la eficiencia en tiempo e incrementando la calidad de los resultados obtenidos.

(This paper pretend to be a guide to the systematic literature review useful to know a particular field of study, develop a theoretical framework and establish the appropriate hypothesis on which to focus research. To this end we have sought to specify the actions to take in different phases, which have been defined in five steps to follow in this process: identifying the field of study and analysis period, selection of sources of information, conducting the search (what, where and how), management and treatment of search results and analysis of results. Each of them have been described in detail and exemplified on the basis of our experience. Due to the importance of the systematic review on research, papers like the presented here, help to perform this activity while improving efficiency and increasing the quality of the results)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Carmen Medina-Lopez, Universidad de Sevilla

Dpto. Economía Financiera y Dirección de Operaciones. F.CC. Económicas y Empresariales de Sevilla.

Juan A. Marin-Garcia, Universitat Politècnica de València

ROGLE - Departamento de Organización de Empresas

Rafaela Alfalla-Luque, Universidad de Sevilla

Dpto. Economía Financiera y Dirección de Operaciones. F.CC. Económicas y Empresariales de Sevilla.

References

Alfalla-Luque, R. y Medina-López, C. (2009). Supply Chain Management: Unheard of in the 1970s, core to today's company. Business History, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 201–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00076790902726558

Alfaro Tanco, J.A., Alvarez Gil, M.J. y Montes, M.J. (2001). Gestión de la Cadena de Suministros: evolución y tratamiento en el ámbito de la Dirección de Operaciones. Actas XI Congreso Nacional de ACEDE, Zaragoza.

Amoako-Gyampah, K. y Meredith, J.R. (1989). The Operations Management Research Agenda: An Update. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 8, nº. 3, August, pp. 250-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(89)90027-2

Babbar, S. y Prasad, S. (1998). International Purchasing. Inventory Management and Logistics Research. An assessment and agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18 (1), pp. 6-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579810192763

Barman, S., Hanna, M.D. y LaForge, R.L. (2001). Perceived relevance and quality of POM journals: a decade later. Journal of Operations Management, 19 (), pp. 367-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00060-7

Barman, S., Tersine, RlJ. y Buckley, M.R. (1991). An Empirical Assesment of the Perceived Relevance and Quality of POM-Related Journals by Academicians. Journal of Operations Management, 10 (2), pp. 194-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(91)90022-P

Bath School of Management (2004). Journal ratings list. University of Bath, Bath (UK).

Burgess, K., Singh, P.J., y Koroglu, R. (2006). Supply chain management: A structured literature review and implications for future research. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26 (7): pp. 703-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570610672202

Chase, R.B. (1980): A Classification and Evaluation of Research in Operations Management. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 1, nº. 1, pp. 9-14 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(80)90006-6

Donohue, J.M. y Fox, J.B. (2000). A multi-method evaluation of journal in the decision and management sciences by US academics. Omega International Journal of Management Science, 28 (), pp 17-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00024-9

Filippini, R. (1997): Operations management research: some reflections on evolution, models and empirical studies in OM. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 17, nº. 7, pp. 655-670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579710175583

Flynn, B., Sakakibara, S., Schroeder, R., Bates, D. y Flynn, E. (1990): Empirical research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 9, nº. 2, pp. 250-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(90)90098-X

Goh, C., Holsapple, C.W., Johnson, L.E. y Tanner, J.R. (1997). Evaluating and classifying POM journals. Journal of Operations Management, 15 (2-May), pp 123-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00102-7

Goh, C.H., Holsapple, C.W., Johnson, L.E. y Tanner, J. (1996). An Empirical Assessment of Influences on POM Research. Omega International Journal of Management Science, 24 (3), pp. 337-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00064-X

Hsieh, P. & Chang, P. (2009). An assessment of world-wide research productivity in production and operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 120 (2), pp 540-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.03.015

Holsapple, C., & Lee-Post, A. (2010). Behavior-based analysis of knowledge dissemination channels in operations management. Omega, 38(3/4), pp 167-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.08.002

Karlsson, C., & Ahlström, P. (1998). The history of thought in operations management: A European perspective. Plenary presentation at POMS Conference, Orlando, Florida.

Machuca, J.A.D., González-Zamora, M.M. y Aguilar-Escobar, V. G. (2007). Service Operations Management research. Journal of Operations Management, 25 (3), pp 585-601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.005

Kher, M.H. (1996). Institutional research productivity in production and operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 14 (), pp 55-77.

Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2008). Guía de investigación para el desarrollo de la carrera del profesorado: organización de empresas (volumen 13). Valencia: Editorial de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.

McCutcheon, D.M. y Meredith, J.R. (1993). Conducting case study research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 11 (), pp 239-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(93)90002-7

Meredith, J.R y Amoako-Gyampah, K. (1990): "The Genealogy of Operations Management", Journal of Operations Management, vol. 9, nº. 2, pp. 146-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(90)90093-S

Meredith, J.R., Raturi, A., Amoako-Gyampah, K. y Kaplan, B. (1989): Alternative Research Paradigms in Operations. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 8, nº. 4, Oct., pp. 297-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(89)90033-8

Olson, J. E. (2005). Top-25-business-school professors rate journals in operations management and related fields. Interfaces, 35 (4), pp 323-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1050.0149

Pannirselvam, G.P., Ferguson, L.A., Ash, R.C. y Siferd, S.P. (1999): Operations management research: un update for the 1990's. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 18, pp. 95-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00009-1

Parsons, R. y Globerson, S. (1987): Content Modification in Operations Management. Operations Management Review, vol. 5, nº. 3, pp. 1-10.

Piercy, N., Caldwell, N., y Rich, N. (2009). Considering connectivity in operations journals.International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 58(7), pp. 607-631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410400910989449

Prasad, S. y Babbar, S. (2000): International Operations Management Research. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 18, pp. 209-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00015-7

Prasad, S., Babbar, S. y Calis, A. (2000): International Operations Management and Operations Management research: a comparative analysis. OMEGA, vol. 28, pp. 97-110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00031-6

Pilkington, A. y Liston-Heyes, C. (1999). Is production and operations management a discipline? A citacion/co-citation study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19 (1), pp. 7-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579910244188

Rungtusanatham, M.J., Choi, T.Y., Hollingworth, D.G., Wu, Z., y Forza, C. (2003). Survey research in operations management: Historical analyses. Journal of Operations Management, 21 (4), pp. 475-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(03)00020-2

Scudder, G.D. y Hill, C.A. (1998): A Review and Classification of Empirical Research in Operations Management. Journal of Operations Management, vol. 16, pp. 91-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00008-9

Sekaran, U. y Boggie, R. (2010): Research methods for business. A skill building approach. Ed. Wiley, Chichester, UK.

Slack, N., Lewis, M., & Bates, H. (2004). The two worlds of operations management research and practice: Can they meet, should they meet? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24 (4), pp. 372-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570410524640

Soteriou, A., Hadjinicola, G. y Patsia, K. (1999). Assessing production and operations management related journals: the European perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 17, pp. 225-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00040-0

Swamidass, P.M. (1991): Empirical Science: New Frontier in Operations Management Research. Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, nº. 4, pp. 793-814.

Vokurka, R.J. (1996). The Relative Importance of Journal Used in Operations Management Research. A Citation Analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 14 (4), pp. 345-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00092-7

Young, S.T., Baird, B.C, y Pullman, M.E. (1996). POM research productivity in U.S. business schools. Journal of Operations Management, 14 (1), pp. 41-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(95)00038-0

Downloads

Published

2010-11-12

How to Cite

Medina-Lopez, C., Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Alfalla-Luque, R. (2010). Una propuesta metodológica para la realización de búsquedas sistemáticas de bibliografía (A methodological proposal for the systematic literature review). WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 1(2), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v1i2.786

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>