Protocol: validation of the INCODE barometer to measure the innovation compe-tence through the Rasch Measurement Theory

Authors

  • Lidia Sanchez-Ruiz Universidad de Cantabria
  • Beatriz Blanco Universidad de Cantabria
  • Juan A. Marín-García Universitat Politècnica de València

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7190

Keywords:

research, protocol, INCODE barometer, innovation competence, Rasch Measurment Theory

Abstract

This communication presents a protocol in order to show the different phases that must be followed in order to validate the INCODE barometer, which is used to measure the innovation competence, with Rasch Measurement Theory. Five phases are stated: dimensionality analysis, individual reliability and validity analysis of ítems and persons, global reliability and validity analysis, and cathegory analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lidia Sanchez-Ruiz, Universidad de Cantabria

Departamento Administración de Empresas

References

Aznar-Mas, Lourdes E.; Montero-Fleta, B.; Pérez Peñalver, M. J.; Watts, F.; García-Carbnell, A.; Marín-García, J. A. (2015). De proyecto INCODE a FINCODA: utilización del Barómetro INCODE en alumnos universitarios y en empleados con comptencias de innovación. Congreso IN-RED.

Aznar-Mas, L. E.; Pérez-Peñalver, M.J.; Montero-Fleta, B.; González-Ladrón de Guevara, F. R.; Marín-García, J. A.; Atarés-Huerta, L. M. (2016). Indicadores de comportamiento de la competencia de innovación en el ámbito académico y en el profesional: revisión de la literatura. Congreso IN-RED.

Linacre, J.M. (2002). What do infit and outfit, mean square and standardizez mean?. Rasch measure-ment Transactions, VOl. 16, No. 2, pp.878.

Linacre, J.M. (2012). Winsterps Rasch measurement computer program. User’s Guide. Beaverton, Ore-gon: Winsteps.com.

Rhemtulla, M.; Brosseau-Liard, P. É.; Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods un-der suboptimal conditions. Psychological methods, Vol. 17, No.3, pp. 354.

Salzberger, T.; Sinkovics, R. R. (2006). Reconsidering the problem of data equivalence in international marketing research: Contrasting approaches based on CFA and the Rasch model for measure-ment. International Marketing Review, Vol. 23, No.4, pp. 390-417.

Sanchez-Ruiz, L.; Blanco, B. (2016) Validación de constructos en dirección de operaciones mediante la Teoria de Medición de Rasch. El caso del constructo “motivación para implantar la mejora con-tinua”. Working papers on Operations Management, Vol. 7, no 2, pp. 97-118.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-07

How to Cite

Sanchez-Ruiz, L., Blanco, B., & Marín-García, J. A. (2017). Protocol: validation of the INCODE barometer to measure the innovation compe-tence through the Rasch Measurement Theory. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 8, 120–124. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7190

Issue

Section

OMTECH-Workshop