Evaluating the impact of ERP systems on SC performance with ISM
Submitted: 2017-01-29
|Accepted: 2017-04-24
|Published: 2017-06-07
Downloads
Keywords:
Research, enterpise systems, SC performance, ERP benefits, ISM, Case study
Supporting agencies:
Abstract:
Most companies nowadays have already implemented on-premise or cloud -based ERP systems into their IT infraestrutures. These packages allow firms to integrate, standardize and execute the whole business processes in real time, improving their productivity and operational efficiency. Previous studies highlight their beneficial effects go beyond the single firm. Indeed, ERP system can assist supply-chain partners to work in close coordination. In order to reach a better understanding in this matter, the present study aims to develop a comprehensive framework. This will represent the benefits derived from ERP adoption in Supply Chain performance. In doing so, we applied an interpretive structural modelling (ISM). Finally, we provide a case study that explores the viability of this framework.
References:
Ansari, M. F., Kharb, R. K., Luthra, S., Shimmi, S. L., & Chatterji, S. (2013). Analysis of barriers to implement solar power installations in India using interpretive structural modeling technique. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 163–174. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.002
Attri, R., Dev, N., & Sharma, V. (2013). Interpretive Structural Modelling ( ISM ) approach : An Overview. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 2(2), 3–8. http://doi.org/10.1108/01443579410062086
Bouzon, M., Govindan, K., & Rodriguez, C. M. T. (2015). Reducing the extraction of minerals: Reverse logistics in the machinery manufacturing industry sector in Brazil using ISM approach. Resources Policy, 46, 27–36. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.02.001
Chou, D. C., Tan, X., & Yen, D. C. (2004). Web technology and supply chain management". Information Management & Computer, 12(4), 338–349.
Davenport, T. H. (1998). Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 121–131. http://doi.org/Technical Report
Hendricks, K. B., Singhal, V. R., & Stratman, J. K. (2007). The impact of enterprise systems on corporate performance: A study of ERP, SCM, and CRM system implementations. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 65–82. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.002
Hussain, M., Awasthi, A., & Tiwari, M. K. (2015). An ISM-ANP integrated framework for evaluating alternatives for sustainable supply chain management. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(5–6), 3671–3687. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.09.018
Jacobs, F. R., & Whybarck, D. C. (2000). Why ERP? A primer on SAP implementation. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Koh, S. C. L., Gunasekaran, a., & Rajkumar, D. (2008). ERP II: The involvement, benefits and impediments of collaborative information sharing. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(1), 245–268. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.04.013
Kovács, G. L., & Paganelli, P. (2003). A planning and management infrastructure for large, complex, distributed projects - Beyond ERP and SCM. Computers in Industry, 51(2), 165–183. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(03)00034-4
Mandal, A., & Deshmukh, S. G. (1994). Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM). International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(6), 52–59. http://doi.org/10.1108/01443579410062086
Ng, C. S. P., Gable, G. G., & Chan, T. (2002). An ERP-client benefit-oriented maintenance taxonomy. Journal of Systems and Software, 64(2), 87–109. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(02)00029-8
Sage, A. P. (1977). Interpretive structural modeling: methodology for large scale systems. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
Warfield, J. (1973). Binary Matrices in System Modeling. Ieee Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-3(5), 441–449. http://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309270
Warï¬eld, J. . (1974). Developing interconnected matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transcript on Systems Men and Cybernetics, 4(1), 51–81.
Wong, W. P., & Wong, K. Y. (2014). Synergizing an ecosphere of lean for sustainable operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 51–66. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.093
