Does the active participation of students serve as a predictor of good marks achievement?

José Angel Miguel-Dávila, Dadid López-Berzosa, Miryam Martín-Sánchez

Abstract

The new context in education framed under the European Higher Education Area, EHEA, entails a radical change in the way students and teachers interact. Students must adopt an active role in their learning processes in which the educator no longer remains as the sole conductor but rather serves the purpose of facilitating the student´s learning processes.

This paper presents an experiment aimed at investigating potential relationships between the student’s attitude towards active learning and his or her final grading. The results of the experiment conducted in the context of a subject on Operations Management delivered to a group of 100 students in business administration reveal (1) a positive relationship between the student’s involvement in active learning and higher grading and (2) the special relevance of attendance and written tasks conducted along the course as far as the effectiveness of active learning is concerned.


Keywords

Teaching; Student; Active participation; Operations Management

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alfalla-Luque, R.; Medina-Lopez, C.; Arenas-Márquez, F.J. (2011). Mejorando la formación en Dirección de Operaciones: La visión del estudiante y su respuesta ante diferentes metodologías docentes. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 40-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2011.01.002

Bacon, D.; Stewart, K.; Silver, W. (1999). Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: how a teacher can make a difference. Journal of Management Education, Vol. 23, pp. 467-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299902300503

Boud, D.; Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 399-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050

Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728

Braxton, J.M.; Milem, J.F.; Sullivan, A.S. (2000). The influence of Active Learning on the College Student Departure Procees. The Journal of Higher Education, No. 71, No. 5, pp. 569-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2000.11778853

Buendía, L.; Olmedo, E. (2000). Estrategias de aprendizaje y procesos de evaluación en educación universitaria. Bordón, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 151-164.

Caldwell, M.; Weishar, J.; Glezen, G. (1996). The effect of cooperative learning on student perceptions of accounting in the principles course. Journal of Accounting Education, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0748-5751(95)00032-1

Cannon, R.; Newble, D. (2000). A Handbook for teachers in Universities and Colleges. Kogan Page, London.

Carless, D.; Joughin, G.; Wok, M.M.C. (2006). Learning-oriented assessment: principles and practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 395-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679043

Catenazzi, N.; Sommaruga, L.; (1999). The evaluation of the Hyper Apuntes interactive learning environment. Computers and Education, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(98)00039-6

Collaud, G.; Gurtner, J.L.; Coen, P.F. (2000). Design and use of a hypermedia system at the University level. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, No. 16, pp. 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00125.x

Deeter-Schmeltz, D.; Ramsey, R. (1998). Student team performance: a method for classroom assessment. Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/027347539802000202

de Grave, W.S.; Dolmans, D.H.J.M.; Van der Vleuten, C.P.M. (2002). Student Perspectives on Critical Incidents in the Tutorial Group. Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol. 7, No. 3 pp. 201-209. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021104201303

Ellis, T.J; Hafner, W. (2008). Building a Framework to Support Project-Based Collaborative Learning Experiences in an Asynchronous Learning Network. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, Vol. 4, pp. 167-190. https://doi.org/10.28945/3206

Fernández, M.T.; Tuset, A.M.; Ross, G.P; Leyva, A.C.; Alvídrez, A. (2010). Prácticas educativas constructivistas en clases de ciencias. Propuesta de un instrumento de análisis. Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 26-44.

Fish, L. (2008). Graduate student project: employer operations management analysis. Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 84, No. 1, pp. 18-30. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.1.18-30

Greene, W.H. (2011). Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall.

Hampton, D.; Grudnitski, G. (1996). Does cooperative learning mean equal learning? Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 72, No. 1, pp. 5-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1996.10116817

Huber, G. (2008). Aprendizaje activo y metodologías educativas. Revista de Educación, No. Extra, pp. 59-81

Kirschner, P.A.; Beers, P.J.; Boshuizen, H.P.A.; Gijselaers, W.H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 24, pp. 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.028

Krull, J.L.; MacKinnon, D.P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 249-277. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3602_06

Kunkel, J.G.; Shafer, W.E., (1997). Effects of student team learning in undergraduate auditing courses. Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 72, No. 4, 197-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1997.10116853

Lancaster, K.; Strand, C. (2001). Using the team-learning model in a managerial accounting class: an experiment in cooperative learning. Issues in Accounting Education Vol. 16, No. 4, 549-567. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2001.16.4.549

Leach, J.; Scott, P. (2003). Individual and sociocultural views of learning in science education. Science and Education, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022665519862

Leeds, M.; Stull, W.; Westbrook, J. (1998). Do changes in classroom techniques matter? Teaching strategies and their effects on teaching evaluations. Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 75-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832329809601665

Liu, N. F.; Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582

Marton, F.; Säljö, R. (1976). On Qualitative Differences in Learning: I Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x

Miglietti, C., (2002). Using cooperative small groups in introductory accounting classes: a practical approach. Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 111-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320209599707

Padilla-Carmona, M.T.; Gil-Flores, J.; Rodríugez-Santero, J.; Torres-Gordillo, J.J. ClaresLópez, J. (2010). Evaluando el sistema de evaluación del aprendizaje universitario: análisis documental aplicado al caso de la Universidad de Sevilla. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie5331735

Peters, M.; Kethley, B.; Bullington, K. (2002). The relationship between homework and performance in an introductory operations management course. Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 77, No. 6, pp. 340-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320209599686

Polito, T.; Kros, J.; Watson, K. (2004). Improving Operations Management Concept Recollection Via the Zarco Experiential Learning Activity. Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 79, No. 5, pp. 283-287. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.79.5.283-286

Pratton, J.; Hales, L.W. (1986). The Effects of Active Participation on Student Learning. Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 79, No. 4, pp. 210-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1986.10885679

Preacher, K.J.; Rucker, D.D.; Hayes, A.F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 185-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316

Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 223-246. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Rayburn, L.G.; Rayburn, J.M. (1999). Impact of course length and homework assignments on student performance. Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 74, No. 6, pp. 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832329909601705

Rothkopf, E.Z. (1970). The concept of mathemagenic activities. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 325-336. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543040003325

Wilson, M.; Scalise, K. (2006). Assessment to improve learning in higher education: the BEAR Assessment System. Higher Education, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 635-663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-7263-y

Abstract Views

4985
Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Cited-By (articles included in Crossref)

This journal is a Crossref Cited-by Linking member. This list shows the references that citing the article automatically, if there are. For more information about the system please visit Crossref site

1. Teaching innovation system applied in business management subjects.
Rafael Rosillo, José Ángel Miguel Dávila, Carlos Fernández Robles, Montserrat Méndez Redondo
WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management  vol: 8  first page: 143  year: 2017  
doi: 10.4995/wpom.v8i0.7195



This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Universitat Politècnica de València

e-ISSN: 1989-9068   https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom