Salvem el Cabanyal: Urban movements and their claim for the “Right to the City”

Luz Navarro Eslava

Abstract

In the last 15 years a network of urban social movements has sprouted around Valencia under the name of the ‘Salvem’ [Let’s save]. The main objective of these is to protect their territory from what they consider an external threat. Focusing on the case of Salvem el Cabanyal [Save Cabanyal], this article shows that when a mayor urban renewal plan threatens to erase a consolidated neighborhood, urban conflict can be used by a well-organized community to empower themselves, confront the urban plan and claim their Right to the City, which is the right to live, create, use and take part in the decisions that affect their neighborhood. The most intriguing platform that Salvem has used to channel their protests and engage critical resistance against the plan is the art workshop ‘Portes Obertes’ [Open Door], a way of using art and vernacular architecture to reinforce neighbors’ claim in their struggle. However, if the conflict is beautified focusing merely on the historical and cultural value of the neighborhood, hence forgetting the real causes that underlay behind it, the movement might stop the plan, but it will lose the transformative opportunity.

Keywords

Urban Regeneration; Conflict; El Cabanyal; Right to the City

Full Text:

PDF

References

AGUILAR, G. La interacción, la interpretación y l a implicación como estrategias p articipativas. Arte y políticas de identidad. Murcia: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia, 200l, 3, pp. 19-28.

BURGESS, R., CARMONA, M., KOLSTEE, T. Contemporary Policies for Enablement and Participation: A Critical Review. In: The Challenge of Sustainable Cities. Burgess, R., Carmona, M. and Kolstee, T. (eds). London: Zed Books, 1997, Chapter 6, pp. 139-162.

CASTELLS, M. The city and the grassroots: a cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. London: Edward Arnold, 1983

COOKE, B., KOTHARI, U. The case of Participation as Tyranny. In: Participation – the new Tyranny? Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (eds). London: Zed Books, 2001

DÍAZ ORUETA, F. Madrid: Urban regeneration projects and social mobilization. Cities- The International Journal of Urban Planning. 2007, 24(3), pp. 186-193

FREDIANI, A., BOANO, C. Processes for Just Products: The Capability Space of Participatory Design. In: The Capability Approach, Technology and Design. Ilse Oosterlaken, Jeroen van den Hoven (eds.) London: Springer. 2012, pp. 203-222. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3879-9_12

FRIEDMANN, J. The right to the city, Society and Nature. In: The International Journal of Political Ecology. London : Society and Nature Press, 1992, 1, (1), pp. 71-84

FRIEDMANN, J. Place and Place-making in Cities: A Global Perspective. In: Planning Theory and Practice, 2010, 11(2), pp. 149-165. doi:10.1080/14649351003759573

GAJA I DÍAZ, F. La Ciutat de Vale ncia en el Segle XX. In: La Consolidació De La Ciutat “Moderna”. 2002, [Accessed 26 December 2011]. Available at: http://personales.upv.es/fgaja/publicaciones/pensarvlc.pdf

GAJA I DÍAZ, F. La Participación Ciudadana, algo más que el refrendo. In: Participación Ciudadana para el Urbanismo del siglo XXI. Luís Francisco Herrero (Ed.) Valencia. CTAV, 2005

GÓMEZ FERRI. J. Los movimientos ciudadanos de defensa y activación del patrimonioen Valencia: los casos del Barrio del Cabanyal y la ILP Per l’Horta. In: Experiencias sociales innovadoras y participativas. Jesús Sánchez (ed.). El Rincón + 10. La Orotava: Coordinadora de Defensa del Rincón-Ecologistas en Acción, 2004, pp. 157-205

HARVEY, D. The right to the city. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2003, Vol. 27 (4), pp. 939-941. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00492.x

HARVEY, D. The Right to the City. In: New Left Review. 2008, Vol. 53, pp: 23-40

HARVEY, D. Rebel Cities: From The Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso. 2012

HERRERO GARCÍA, L.F., SOLDEVILLA LIAÑO, M. La plataforma Salvem El Cabanyal: doce años de lucha ciudadana. In: e-rph. Granada: Universidad de Granada, 2010 [Accessed 23 December 2011]. Available at http://www.revistadepatrimonio.es/revistas/numero6/iniciativas/experiencias/articulo.php/niciativasciudadanas

HICKEY, S. AND MOHAN, G. Relocating Participation Within a Radical Politics of Development. In: Development and Change, 2005, 36 (2) pp. 237-262.

LEFEBVRE, H. On urban Form, Lefebrvre, H. In: Writing on the City. Koffman, E., Lebas, E. (eds, trad.), Oxford: Blackewell, 1996, pp. 133-183.

LÓPEZ NICOLÁS, M., BODÍ RAMIRO, J. Reordenación Urbana, ¿Derechos vulnerados?: El caso del menor en el Cabanyal. In: DTS- Documentos de Trabajo Social, 2009, Vol.46, pp. 37-55.

MARCUSE, P. From critical urban theory to the right to the city. In: City. 2009, 13 (2/3), pp. 185-197.

MARTÍNEZ LÓPEZ, M.A. Social conflicts within the restructuration of the fragmented city. In: Cities- The international journal of urban planning. 2010, 24 (3), pp. 183-186.

MAYER, M. The ‘Right to the City’ in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. In: City, 2009, 13(2/3), pp. 362-374.

MIESSEN, M. Collaboration and the Conflictual. In: The Nightmare of Participation (Crossbench Praxis as a Mode of Criticality). Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2010, pp. 91- 104.

MITCHELL, D. The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: Guilford Press, 2003.

MITLIN, D., THOMPSON, J. Participatory Approaches in Urban Areas. In: Environment and Urbanisation, 1995, 7(1), pp. 231-250.

MOLINA, M. Arte público comprometido y movimientos vecinales en Valencia. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València. 1999 [Accessed 28 December 2011]. Avaliable at http://www.upv.es/intermedia/pages/laboratori/grup_investigacio/textos/docs/miguel_molina_arte_publico_comprometido.PDF

PUGALIS, L., GIDDINGS, B.A Renewed Right to Urban Life: A Twenty-First Century Engagement with Lefebvre’s Initial “Cry”. In: Architectural Theory Review, 2011, 16(3), pp. 278-295

PURCELL, M. Neighbourhood Activism among Homeowners as a Politics of Space. In: Professional Geographer, 2001, 53(2) pp. 178-194. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00278

PURCELL, M. Excavating Lefebvre: The Right to the City and Its Urban Politics of the Inhabitant. In: GeoJournal, 2002, 58(2-3), pp. 99–108. doi:10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f

SANOFF, H. Multiple Views of Participatory Design. In: International Journal of Architectural Research. 2008, 2(1) pp. 57-69.

SANTAMARINA CAMPOS, B. Movimientos sociales: una revisión teórica y nuevas aproximaciones. In: Boletín de Antropología. Colombia. Universidad de Antioquia. 2008, 22(39), pp. 112-131.

SMITH, N. New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy. In: Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe. , N. Brenner and N. Theodore (Eds.) New York: Blackwell. 2002, pp. 80–103.

VERACRUZ MAS, L. Cabanyal 2020: Rehabilitación Sin Destrucción. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto Pascual Madoz del Territorio, Urbanismo y Medio Ambiente. 2009 [Accessed 23 December 2011]. Available at http://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/10042

Abstract Views

4685
Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM




This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Universitat Politècnica de València

e-ISSN: 2341-2747    ISSN: 2341-3050   https://doi.org/10.4995/vlc

Guardar