In-Between Spaces and Urban Governance: ‘School Thresholds’ in Madrid

Lucila Urda Peña

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7775-0422

Spain

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos image/svg+xml

Lucila Urda Peña, PhD, architect from UPM (ETSAM) and coordinator of the urbanism area of the Bachelor's Degree in Fundamentals of Architecture at the URJC in Madrid Sur, is a prominent member of the PENT(H)A Research Group and collaborates with NUTAC and ABIO.

With a profound expertise in urban regeneration, public space, social housing, and educational environments, Dr. Urda Peña has developed numerous consulting projects aimed at improving cities, renaturalizing public urban spaces, and enhancing educational surroundings. Her work has been recognized with numerous national and international awards. As an expert in urban art, she views it as a driving force for contemporary sociocultural activation, particularly through projects, publications, exhibitions, and research conducted in the city of Madrid. Her publications and research focus on humanizing cities, integrating participation and co-creation processes in urban transformations. Dr. Urda Peña has led local research projects and is actively involved in national and European research initiatives.

Serafina Amoroso

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-2069

Spain

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos image/svg+xml

Graduate Architect (Università degli Studi di Firenze, 2001) with a degree recognized in Spain in 2018; PhD (Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, 2006) with a degree recognized in Spain in 2014; Master in Advanced Architectural Projects (ETSAM, 2012); Master in Applied Research in Feminist, Gender and Citizenship Studies (Jaume I University, 2016). From 2007 to April 2019, she worked as an Associate Professor of Projects at the School of Architecture of the University of Florence, carrying out in parallel, between 2014 and 2017, this position and that of teacher of Plastic Arts, Drawing and Art History in a secondary school. Her teaching career has always been characterized by a commitment to quality and innovative teaching, focused on the challenges of the EHEA and teaching innovation, as demonstrated by her selection in 2014 to undertake a stay at the AA (Architectural Association School of Architecture) as part of the Visiting Teachers' Programme, and her participation in 2017 in the ERASMUS+ STAFF MOBILITY FOR TEACHING programme. Since November 2020, she has been a member of the Doctoral Programme in Architectural Communication (DOCA-ETSAM) as an external expert and doctoral thesis supervisor. Since September 2022, she has been an Assistant Professor in the Department of Architectural Projects at the EIF (Fuenlabrada School of Engineering) of the Rey Juan Carlos University of Madrid. Since the beginning of her career, she has combined her professional practice - which began in 2001 in Florence in the studio of Alberto Breschi (former member of the radical group Zzigurat), with whom she has shared many professional experiences, both as a collaborator and as a partner - with academic activity (both teaching and research). The (original, systematic, and coherent) results of her research activity - achieved working within the framework of "official" research teams and as an independent researcher. Have been published in peer-reviewed journals (including Bracket, CLOG, Dichtomy, HORIZONTE, MONU Magazine, VAD. Revista científica de arquitectura, ÁBACO, Asparkía. Investigació feminista), in conference proceedings and in book chapters. Likewise, her supervision of PFC, TFM and, more recently, doctoral theses, as well as her participation (as a speaker, scientific committee and/or organizer) in conferences and workshops, or as a designer (alone or in a team) in national and international design competitions (whose results have often been awarded, published and exhibited), have constantly offered her opportunities and pretexts for reflection and allowed her to advance her research. Her main lines of research have been refined over the years, recently focusing on gender approaches and their relationships with space (urban and architectural) and pedagogical practices.

|

Accepted: 2026-03-14

|

Published: 2026-04-30

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/vlc.2026.24845
Funding Data

Downloads

Transformed school environment. EI Osa Menor. Chamberí District.

Keywords:

School thresholds, governance, participation, community, social inequality

Supporting agencies:

This research was not funded

Abstract:

The article proposes the concept of the ‘school threshold’ as an urban space for social, cultural, and
educational exchange, connecting schools with their surrounding communities. It argues that these spaces can
humanize and make cities more welcoming, by transforming neighbourhoods through their adaptation. The
study analyses three cases in Madrid in detail, focusing on both physical changes and the processes involved,
with governance identified as a key factor. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through statistics,
maps, plans, photographs, and interviews with stakeholders. The comparison of cases highlights diverse
social and physical contexts, and the evaluation delves into participant interactions from project conception to
implementation. The findings underscore the importance of school thresholds as strategic spaces for inclusive
and intersectional urban policies, particularly in vulnerable areas.

Show more Show less

References:

Anguelovski, Isabelle, James J. T. Connolly, Helen Cole, et al. “Green Gentrification in European and North American Cities.” Nature Communications 13, no. 3816 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31572-1.

Antoniadis, Dimitrios, Nikolaos Katsoulas, and Constantinos Kittas. “Simulation of Schoolyard’s Microclimate and Human Thermal Comfort under Mediterranean Climate Conditions: Effects of Trees and Green Structures.” International Journal of Biometeorology 62, no. 11 (2018): 2025–2036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-018-1612-5.

Bennett, Nathan J., and Terre Satterfield. “Environmental Governance: A Practical Framework to Guide Design, Evaluation, and Analysis.” Conservation Letters 11, no. e12600 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12600.

Bikomeye, Jean C., Joanna Balza, and Kirsten M. Beyer. “The Impact of Schoolyard Greening on Children’s Physical Activity and Socioemotional Health: A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 2 (2021): 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020535.

Bohnert, Amy M., Laura Nicholson, Laurel Mertz, et al. “Green Schoolyard Renovations in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods: Benefits to Students, Schools, and the Surrounding Community.” American Journal of Community Psychology 69, no. 3-4 (2022): 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12559.

Bronfenbrenner, Urie. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.

Chawla, Louise. “Childhood Place Attachments.” In Place Attachment. Human Behavior and Environment, edited by Irwin Altman and Setha M. Low. New York: Plenum, 1992.

Craft, Anna. “The Limits to Creativity in Education: Dilemmas for the Educator.” British Journal of Educational Studies 51, no. 2, (2003): 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00229.

Franco Calderón, Ángela María. “El Edificio Escolar en la Ciudad. La Localización de los Equipamientos Educativos y su Aporte en el Desarrollo Urbano y Social.” Revista Educación y Pedagogía 54, no. 21 (2009): 141-153. http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.Co/revistas/index.php/revistaeyp/article/view/9784/8993.

GEA21. Entornos Escolares + Naturales. Manual de actuaciones con criterios climáticos. Madrid: Ayuntamiento de Madrid, 2023.

Grinberg, Silvia, and Carla Andrea Villagrán. “La Reforma de la Educación y sus Arquitecturas: Un Estudio en la Cotidianidad de las Escuelas.” Perfiles Educativos 42, no. 170 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2020.170.59062.

Guilliani, Gipsy M. “Umbrales Urbanos: Dialéctica entre el Interior y el Exterior en la Tercera Dimensión de la Ciudad.” In Actas I Congreso Iberoamericano Refundamentos: Experiencias y Métodos de Investigación, 2017.

Hertzberger, Herman. Space and Learning: Lessons in Architecture 3. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2008.

Honey-Rosés, Jordi, et al. Protegim Les Escoles: Avaluació dels Entorns Pacificats del Programa Protegim Les Escoles 2021 de la Ciutat de Barcelona. Barcelona: ISGlobal, Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ICTA-UAB), Ajuntament de Barcelona, 2023.

Iojă, Ioan-Cristian, Simona Raluca Grădinaru, Diana Andreea Onose, Gabriel Ovidiu Vanău, and Constantina Alina Tudor. “The Potential of School Green Areas to Improve Urban Green Connectivity and Multifunctionality.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 13, no. 4 (2014): 704–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.07.002.

Jickling, Bob, and Stephen Sterling. Post-Sustainability and Environmental Education. Remaking Education for the Future. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017.

Juárez Chicote, Antonio, and Fernando Rodríguez Ramírez. “El Espacio Intermedio y los Orígenes del Team X / The Space Between and the Origins of Team X.” Proyecto, Progreso, Arquitectura, no. 11 (2014): 52–63. https://doi.org/10.12795/ppa.2014.i11.04.

Kuh, Lisa P., Iris Ponte, and Clement Chau. “The Impact of a Natural Playscape Installation on Young Children’s Play Behaviors.” Children, Youth and Environments 23, no. 2, (2013): 49–77. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.23.2.0049.

Lee, Andrew C., and Ravi Maheswaran. “The Health Benefits of Urban Green Spaces: A Review of the Evidence.” Journal of public health (Oxford, England) 33, no. 2, (2011): 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdq068.

López-Sevilla, Naiara, and Amaia Albizua. “Gobernanza, Cambio Climático y Soluciones Basadas en la Naturaleza en VitoriaGasteiz: La Naturalización de Patios Escolares.” Ciudad Y Territorio Estudios Territoriales 57 (2025). https://doi.org/10.37230/ CyTET.2025.223.5.

Lucas, Adam J., and Janet E. Dyment. “Where Do Children Choose to Play on the School Ground? The Influence of Green Design.” Education 3-13 38, no. 2, (2010): 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270903130812.

Marcella A. Raney, Colette F. Hendry, and Samantha A. Yee. “Physical Activity and Social Behaviors of Urban Children in Green Playgrounds.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 56, no. 4 (2019): 522–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. amepre.2018.11.004.

Marchant Emily, Charlotte Todd, Roxanne Cooksey, et al. “Curriculum-Based Outdoor Learning for Children Aged 9–11: A Qualitative Analysis of Pupils’ and Teachers’ Views.” PLoS ONE 14, no. 5, (2019): e0212242. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0212242

Portalés-Mañanós, Ana María, Javier Pérez-Igualada, Rafael Temes-Cordovez,, and David Urios-Mondéjar. 2025. “Cartografías de Proximidad: Sinergias entre Escuelas y Parques de Barrio en la Ciudad de Valencia.” Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales 57 (2025). https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2025.226.16.

Rodríguez Romero, Eva J., Rocío Santo-Tomás Muro, and Carlota Sáenz de Tejada Granados. “Espacios Umbral en Madrid. Visiones desde la Memoria hacia la Ciudad Futura.” In Visiones Urbanas. IX Jornadas internacionales Arte y Ciudad. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2020.

Saltofte, Margit. “Challenging Institutional Conventions and Forming a Voice through Creativity.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 10, (2013): 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.007.

Sekulova, Filka, and Isabel Ruiz Mallén. “The Governance Configurations of Green Schoolyards.” Environmental Science & Policy 156 (2024): 103752, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103752.

Smithson, Alison and Peter Smithson. “The Space Between.” In Oppositions. Institute for Architecture and Urban Studies, 1974.

Tonucci, Francesco. La Ciudad de los Niños: Un Modo Nuevo de Pensar la Ciudad. Barcelona: Losada, 1996.

Trilla Bernet, Jaume. “La Educación y la Ciudad.” Educación y Ciudad, no. 2, (2015): 6–19.

Van den Bogerd, Nicole, Dieuwke Hovinga, Jelle A. Hiemstra, and Jolanda Maas. “The Potential of Green Schoolyards for Healthy Child Development: A Conceptual Framework.” Forests 14, no. 4 (2023): 660. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040660.

Van Dijk-Wesselius, Janke E., Jolanda Maas, Dieuwke Hovinga, Mark van Vugt, and Agnes E. van den Berg. “The Impact of Greening Schoolyards on the Appreciation, and Physical, Cognitive and Social-Emotional Well-Being of Schoolchildren: A Prospective Intervention Study.” Landscape and Urban Planning, no. 180 (2018): 15-26.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landurbplan.2018.08.003.

Van Dijk-Wesselius, Janke E., Jolanda Maas, Mark van Vugt, and Agnes E. van den Berg. “A Comparison of Children’s Play and Non-Play Behaviour before and after Schoolyard Greening Monitored by Video Observations.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, no. 80 (2022): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101760.

Show more Show less