Weakening architecture: reflections on contemporary architecture
Submitted: 2025-06-30
|Accepted: 2026-02-16
|Published: 2026-04-30
Copyright (c) 2026 VLC arquitectura. Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Keywords:
Pensiero debole, new realism, object-oriented ontology, ethical commitment, conscious architecture
Supporting agencies:
Abstract:
In a world undergoing accelerated transformation, architecture seeks to redefine its role as a driver
of change. This article traces a selective trajectory throughout the formation of the contemporary episteme to
then reformulate architectural practice through the philosophical notion of weakness. To this end, it describes
the transition from hermeneutic thought to contemporary realist currents, critically reflecting on specific
positions within both approaches. Drawing on an unpublished text by Gianni Vattimo, the weakening hypothesis
is reformulated in operational terms and three vectors for a conscious architecture are proposed: process,
commitment, and agency. Process reappears as an alternative to the hegemony of the architectural object,
shifting the focus toward the project’s life cycle. Commitment assumes an ethical and political responsibility
in response to the warnings of the present. Agency defines the propositional spirit inherent to the discipline,
oriented toward generating a form of dialogical resistance in relation to economic and social dynamics.
Weakening architecture is thus proposed as a modus operandi aware of the continuous intersubjective and non-
linear transformation of reality: a design –based approach attitude that promotes an informed and proactive
architecture capable of operating effectively under conditions of uncertainty
References:
Bermejo Barrera, José Carlos. La fragilidad de los sabios y el fin del pensamiento. Madrid: Akal, 2009.
Bostrom, Nick. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Danto, Arthur C. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997
De Graaf, Reinier. Architecture Against Architecture: A Manifesto. London: Verso, 2026.
Eco, Umberto. I limiti dell’interpretazione. Milano: Bompiani, 1990.
Ferraris, Maurizio. Manifesto del nuovo realismo. Roma–Bari: Laterza, 2012. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_617573
Foucault, Michel. Las palabras y las cosas: Una arqueología de las ciencias humanas. Translated by Alberto García Trevijano. Madrid: Siglo XXI Editores, 2013.
Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press, 1992.
Haraway, Donna J. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016. https://doi. org/10.1215/9780822373780
Harman, Graham. Architecture and Objects. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2022.
Heidegger, Martin. Ser y tiempo. Translated by José Gaos. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2003.
Jencks, Charles. The Language of Postmodern Architecture. New York: Rizzoli, 1977.
Koolhaas, Rem. Junkspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Design, 2001.
Latour, Bruno, and Albena Yaneva. “Dame una pistola y haré que todos los edificios se muevan: Una visión de la arquitectura desde la teoría del actor-red.” In Explorations in Architecture: Teaching, Design, Research, edited by Reto Geiser, 80–89. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2008.
Leach, Neil. The Anaesthetics of Architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
Lyotard, Jean-François. La condición postmoderna: Informe sobre el saber. Translated by Mariano Antolín Rato. Buenos Aires: R.E.I. Argentina, 1991.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. La gaya ciencia. Translated by Andrés Sánchez Pascual. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 2004 .
Rovatti, Pier Aldo, and Alessandro Di Grazia. Inattualità del pensiero debole. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore, 2011.
Rossi, Paolo. Paragone degli impegni moderni e postmoderni. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1989.
Schumacher, Patrik. “Critique of Object-Oriented Architecture.” In The Secret Life of Buildings, edited by Michael Benedikt and Kory Bieg. Austin: Center for American Architecture and Design, 2017.
Solà-Morales, Ignasi de. “Arquitectura dèbil.” Quaderns d’Arquitectura i Urbanisme, no. 175 (1987).
Stoner, Jill. Toward a Minor Architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9304.001.0001
Vaíllo, Gonzalo. Lo cognoscible y lo inefable: una lectura orientada a los objetos del enfoque proyectual de Enric Miralles. PhD diss., Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, 2019.
Vattimo, Gianni, and Pier Aldo Rovatti, eds. Il pensiero debole. Milan: Feltrinelli, 1983.
Vattimo, Gianni. “Sobre arquitectura.” Unpublished manuscript. 1985. Caja 20, fichero 9. Arxiu Gianni Vattimo, Biblioteca Central de la Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
Vattimo, Gianni, and Pier Aldo Rovatti, eds. El pensamiento débil. Translated by Manuel Arranz. Madrid: Cátedra, 2006
Vattimo, Gianni. De la realidad: Fines de la filosofía. Translated by Florencio Ciria. Barcelona: Herder, 2013. https://doi. org/10.2307/j.ctvt7x7z0
Vattimo, Gianni. Television interview by Radiotelevisione Svizzera (RSI), 1992. Italian original. YouTube video, https://youtu. be/WRpPozNAQ88 (accessed June 15, 2023). Translated by the author
Viano, Carlo Augusto. Va’ pensiero. Il carattere della filosofia italiana contemporanea. Torino: Einaudi, 1985.
Wigley, Mark. “The Architectural Brain: The Utopian World of the New Design Thinking.” In This Is Tomorrow: 50 Years After the Exhibition, edited by Andrew Kristof and Alex Vassiliev, 224–231. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2007.
Yaneva, Albena, and Alejandro Zaera-Polo, eds. What Is Cosmopolitical Design? Design, Nature and the Built Environment. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2015.
Zaera-Polo, Alejandro. “The Politics of the Envelope.” Log 13/14 (2008): 193–207.





