Limitación del esfuerzo de los actuadores en el control de paso individual de turbinas eólicas
Enviado: 13-01-2026
|Aceptado: 23-04-2026
|Publicado: 04-05-2026
Derechos de autor 2026 Juan Garrido Jurado, Manuel Lara Ortiz, Francisco Vázquez Serrano, Mario Luis Ruz Ruiz
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Descargas
Palabras clave:
Control de recursos energéticos renovables, diseño de sistemas de control, control de vibraciones, control adaptativo, problemas de control bajo conflicto y/o incertidumbre
Agencias de apoyo:
Resumen:
El control colectivo de paso (CPC) es la técnica estándar parar regular la velocidad angular de aerogeneradores en la región nominal. Para mitigar las cargas periódicas en las palas, se emplea el control individual de paso (IPC), que añade una componente de paso diferente a cada pala. Aunque el IPC reduce considerablemente la fatiga de las palas frente al CPC, incrementa sustancialmente la actividad de paso de pala, lo que puede dañar los actuadores. Este estudio aborda este compromiso proponiendo tres esquemas IPC: anticipativo, proporcional e integral con saturación dinámica. Estos esquemas limitan la señal de control interna en el marco de referencia fijo creado mediante transformaciones de coordenadas multipala. Esta limitación se realiza a través de un parámetro que permite ajustar el esfuerzo de control del IPC, algo difícil de implementar en los IPC convencionales y poco estudiado. Los IPC propuestos se aplican a un aerogenerador de 15 MW simulado en OpenFAST demostrando que es posible alcanzar diseños equilibrados entre el desempeño del CPC y del IPC convencional.
Citas:
Abbas, N.J., Zalkind, D.S., Pao, L., Wright, A., 2022. A reference open-source controller for fixed and floating offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy Science 7, 53–73. DOI: 10.5194/wes-7-53-2022
Aktan, H.D., Bottasso, C.L., 2023. Individual pitch control with a reduced actuator duty cycle*, in: 2023 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA). IEEE, pp. 581–586. DOI: 10.1109/CCTA54093.2023.10252554
Bossanyi, E.A., 2003a. Individual blade pitch control for load reduction. Wind Energy 6, 119–128. DOI: 10.1002/we.76
Bossanyi, E.A., 2003b. Wind turbine control for load reduction. Wind Energy 6, 229–244. DOI: 10.1002/we.95
Burton, T., Jenkins, N., Sharpe, D., Bossanyi, E., 2011. Wind Energy Handbook. Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9781119992714
El Yaakoubi, A., Bouzem, A., El Alami, R., Chaibi, N., Bendaou, O., 2023. Wind turbines dynamics loads alleviation: Overview of the active controls and the corresponding strategies. Ocean Engineering 278, 114070. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114070
Gambier, A., 2022. Control of Large Wind Energy Systems: Theory and Methods for the User. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
Gambier, A., 2021. Pitch control of three bladed large wind energy converters— a review. Energies 14, 1–24. DOI: 10.3390/en14238083
Henry, A., Pusch, M., Pao, L., 2024. Investigation of H∞‐tuned individual pitch control for wind turbines. Wind Energy 27, 1074–1094. DOI: 10.1002/we.2945
Hummel, J.I.S., Kober, J., Mulders, S.P., 2025. Output-constrained individual pitch control methods using the multiblade coordinate transformation: trading off actuation effort and blade fatigue load reduction for wind turbines. Wind Energy Science 10, 2005–2023. DOI: 10.5194/wes-10-2005-2025
Jonkman, B., Platt, A., Mudafort, R.M., Branlard, E., Wang, L., Slaughter, D., et al., 2025. OpenFAST/openfast: Release v4.1.2. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.16755336
Jonkman, B.J., 2009. Turbsim User’s Guide: Version 1.50. Golden, CO (United States). DOI: 10.2172/965520
Kipchirchir, E., Söffker, D., 2024. IPC-based robust disturbance accommodating control for load mitigation and speed regulation of wind turbines. Wind Energy 27, 382–402. DOI: 10.1002/we.2893
Lara, M., Mulders, S.P., van Wingerden, J.W., Vázquez, F., Garrido, J., 2024. Analysis of adaptive individual pitch control schemes for blade fatigue load reduction on a 15 MW wind turbine. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 14. DOI: 10.3390/app14010183
Lara, M., Ruz, M.L., Mulders, S.P., Vázquez, F., Garrido, J., 2025a. Individual pitch controller with static inverted decoupling for periodic blade load reduction on monopile offshore wind turbines. Ocean Engineering 334. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121608
Lara, M., Ruz, M.L., Vázquez, F., Garrido, J., 2025b. Enfoque anticipativo de control de paso individual en turbinas eólicas. Jornadas de Automática. DOI: 10.17979/ja-cea.2025.46.12058
Lio, W.H., Jones, B.Ll., Lu, Q., Rossiter, J.A., 2017. Fundamental performance similarities between individual pitch control strategies for wind turbines. Int J Control 90, 37–52. DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2015.1078912
Mohsin, K., Odeh, M., Ngo, T., Das, T., 2025. Dynamically allocated individual pitch control for fatigue load reduction in wind turbines. Control Eng Pract 161, 106357. DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106357
Mulders, S., Pamososuryo, A., van Wingerden, J., 2020. Efficient tuning of individual pitch control: A bayesian optimization machine learning approach. J Phys Conf Ser 1618, 022039. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1618/2/022039
Mulders, S.P., Pamososuryo, A.K., Disario, G.E., Wingerden, J.W. van, 2019. Analysis and optimal individual pitch control decoupling by inclusion of an azimuth offset in the multiblade coordinate transformation. Wind Energy 22, 341–359. DOI: 10.1002/we.2289
Muñoz-Palomeque, E., Sierra-García, J.E., Santos, M., 2024. Técnicas de control inteligente para el seguimiento del punto de máxima potencia en turbinas eólicas. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática industrial 21, 193–204. DOI: 10.4995/riai.2024.21097
Natarajan, A., 2022. Damage equivalent load synthesis and stochastic extrapolation for fatigue life validation. Wind Energy Science 7, 1171–1181. DOI: 10.5194/wes-7-1171-2022
Niranjan, R., Ramisetti, S.B., 2022. Insights from detailed numerical investigation of 15 MW offshore semi-submersible wind turbine using aero-hydro-servo-elastic code. Ocean Engineering 251, 111024. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111024
Njiri, J.G., Söffker, D., 2016. State-of-the-art in wind turbine control: Trends and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 60, 377–393. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.110
Petrović, V., Jelavić, M., Baotić, M., 2021. MPC framework for constrained wind turbine individual pitch control. Wind Energy 24, 54–68. DOI: 10.1002/we.2558
Pettas, V., Salari, M., Schlipf, D., Cheng, P.W., 2018. Investigation on the potential of individual blade control for lifetime extension. J Phys Conf Ser 1037, 032006. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/3/032006
Selvam, K., Kanev, S., Van Wingerden, J.W., Van Engelen, T., Verhaegen, M., 2009. Feedback-feedforward individual pitch control for wind turbine load reduction. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 19, 72–91. DOI: 10.1002/rnc.1324
Stol, K., Moll, H.-G., Bir, G., Namik, H., 2009. A comparison of multi-blade coordinate transformation and direct periodic techniques for wind turbine control design, in: 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virigina. DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-479
Tang, S., Tian, D., Wu, X., Huang, M., Deng, Y., 2022. Wind turbine load reduction based on 2DoF robust individual pitch control. Renew Energy 183, 28–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.086
Ungurán, R., Petrović, V., Pao, L.Y., Kühn, M., 2019. Uncertainty identification of blade-mounted lidar-based inflow wind speed measurements for robust feedback–feedforward control synthesis. Wind Energy Science 4, 677–692. DOI: 10.5194/wes-4-677-2019
Zhang, C., Chen, Y., Zhao, D., Li, C., Guo, X., Bu, J., 2025. Individual pitch control for load reduction of offshore wind turbine based on particle swarm optimization and fuzzy logic. IET Renewable Power Generation 19. DOI: 10.1049/rpg2.70000
Zhang, Y., Chen, Z., Cheng, M., 2013. Proportional resonant individual pitch control for mitigation of wind turbines loads. IET Renewable Power Generation 7, 191–200. DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2012.0282
Zhao, F., 2025. Global Wind Report 2025. Lisbon.
