May Schools Develop Their Students' Intuition?
Keywords:Intuition, Marketing, Decisions, University education, Social activities
The main purpose of the research has been to dictate the role intuition plays in the decision-making of undergraduate marketing students.
The study and process of decision-making has always been focused on statistics and mathematics by the business world and universities, while most psychological aspects have been avoided.
In recent years emotions, cognitive processes, intuition, etc., have increased their importance in the decision-making process; but they still have a long way to go.
The research, which this article is based on, has been performed under a sample of 404 individuals aged 20 to 25 years; half of which are marketing students in ESIC Business & Marketing School. Their decisions are analysed and compared with other collectives to observe if the information is an accurate significant variable for their decision-making.
A questionnaire was administered to the participants in which they were asked the possible success or failure of specific products if they were to be launched on the market. These products were real and chosen by marketing experts.
The participation of the individual in physical, cultural, etc. activities was also taken into account as well as their personal profile and psychographic data.
The results obtained vary significantly from a statistical point of view and prove that training, background, participations on social activities and the perception of one's intuitive capacity are keys to success when it comes to decision-making.
Agor, W. (1989). Intuition in Organizations: Leading and Managing Productively. Evanston: Sage Publications.
Ambady, N. and Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a Minute: Predicting Teacher Evaluations from Thin Slices of Nonverbal and Physical Attractiveness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64, nº 3. 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.521
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., and Damasio, A. R. (2005). The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: Some questions and answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (4), (pp.159-162). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.002
Bransford, J. D. and Stein, B. S. (1988). Solución ideal de problemas. Barcelona: Labor.
Beilock, S.L., Bertenthal, B.I., McCoy, A.M. and Carr, T.H. (2004). Haste does not always make waste: expertise, direction of attention, and speed versus accuracy in performing sensorimotor skills. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Apr: 11 (2): 373-9. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196585
Burke, L. A., and Sadler-Smith, E. (2006). Instructor intuition in the educational context. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, (pp.169âˆ’181). https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.21253781
Chaiken, S., and Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
Cialdini, R.B., Vincent, J.E., Lewis, S.K., Catalán, J., Wheeler, D. and Derby, B.L. (1975). Reciprocal Concessions Procedure for Inducing Compliance: The Door-in-the-Face Technique. Journal of personality and social psychology. Vol. 31. N. 2 (pp. 206-215). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076284
Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. Nueva York: Harper Collins
Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 351(1346), 1413-1420. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0125
Dane, E. and Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32, 33âˆ’54. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23463682
Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., Covey, J., Matthews, E., and Pill, R. (2001). Presenting risk information – A review of the effects of “framing” and other manipulations on patient outcomes. Journal of Health Communication. 6 (1): 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730150501413
Epstein, S., Lipson, A., Holstein, C. and Huh, E. (2008). Irrational reactions to negative outcomes: Evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of personality and social psychology, nº 62, 328-339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2068
Evans, J. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 1âˆ’24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
Gigerenzer, G. (2007).The intelligence of the unconscious. Nova York: Viking Press.
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. and Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases. The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098
Gladwell, M. (2006). Inteligencia intuitiva. ¿Por qué sabemos la verdad en dos segundos? Madrid: Punto de lectura
Guilera, Ll. (2002).Vías de acceso conceptual a la resolución de problemas: Importancia de los estímulos sensoriales. Tesis doctoral. UAB.
Hammond, K.R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreductible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York: Oxford University Press
Hellriegel, D., Jackson, S.E. and Slocum, J.W. (2002). Administración, un enfoque basado en competencias. Mèxic: Paraninfo.
Helmholtz, H. (1860/1962). Handbuch der physiologischen optik. Southall, J.P.C. Vol. 3. New York: Dover.
Hogarth, R. (2001). Educar la intuición. Barcelona: Editorial Paidós.
Holyoak, K. J and R. E. Nisbett (1988). Induction. En Sternberg, R.J y E.E Smith: The psychology of human thought. Editorial Cambridge, Univ. Press. N.Y
Hunt, E. and Agnoli, F. (1991). The Worfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review, 98 (3). pp 377-389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.3.377
Jacobs, J.E. and Potenza, M. (1991). The Use of Judgement Heuristics to Make Social and Object Decisions: A Developmental Perspective. Child development. 62, February. (pp. 166–178). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01522.x
Kahneman, D., Slovic P. and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgments under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books, New York.
Khatri, N. and Alvin, H. (2000). The role of intuition in strategic decision making. Human Relations, 53 (1), 57-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700531004
Maturana, H (1979). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Paperback. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4
Loftus, E. F., and Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3
Maier, R. (1980). Toma de Decisiones en Grupo. México: Editorial Trillas
Majone, G. (2010). Foundations of risk regulation: science, decision-making, policy learning and institutional reform. Eur. J. Risk Regul. 1 (2010), pp. 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00000027
Mayer, R.E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: Freeman.
Metcalfe, J and Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and non insight problem solving. Memoryand cognition, 15 (3). 238-246. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197722
Mintzberg, H and Westley, F. (2001). Decision Making: It's Not What You Think MIT Sloan Management Review; 42. pg. 89
Miles, A. and Sadler-Smith, E. (2014). With recruitment I always feel I need to listen to my gut: the role of intuition in employee selection, Personnel Review, Vol. 43 Issue: 4, pp.606-627. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2013-0065
Neisser, U. (1963). The multiplicity of thought. British journal of psychology. 54. (pp. 1-14). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1963.tb00857.x
Parikh, J., Lank, A. and Neubauer, F. (1993). Intuition: The New Frontier of Management. Wiley-Blackwell
Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1037/e412982005-012
Sadler-Smith, E., Allinson, C. W. and Hayes, J. (2000). Cognitive style and learning preferences: Some implications for CPD. Management Learning, 31, 239âˆ’256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507600312006
Stanovich, K. E., and West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645âˆ’726. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003435
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293
Vlek, Ch. (1984). Social decision methodology for technological projects. Dordrecht (Netherland) Kluwer academic publishers.
Volz, K. G. (2007). Finding Culturally (In) Dependent Levels of Self-Representation. Workshop. Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Wilson, T. (2002). Strangers to ourselves: discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Yates, J.F. (1990). Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc.
How to Cite
Since 2023 this journal is published under a license
The previous articles keep the license which they were published (license that appears in articles pdf's).