Using active learning methodologies in physical chemistry in CLIL contexts

David Recatalá


One of the main objectives of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) is to promote a change toward a student-centred education model. This fact has led to the implementation of novel methodologies based on active learning, aimed at engaging students’ interest. This implementation has been usually accompanied by significant changes in both the teaching and learning processes in European universities. Furthermore, teaching a subject through the medium of a foreign language has also been gaining attention over the past few years. More specifically, this approach commonly known as Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) has been employed for the simultaneous learning of content and English in a number of European countries. In this contribution we report on the active learning methods implemented in a Physical Chemistry course, as well as the efforts devoted to Content and English Language Integration in this subject. This research analyses a series of factors that can contribute to the global learning and teaching experience when both active learning and CLIL are implemented in the Physical Chemistry classroom. Some examples of them include changes in attitudes towards the subject, engagement and motivation during the course, perception of English learning, and in general, students’ satisfaction with the learning process.


Active learning methods; teaching methodologies; European Higher Education Area; Content and Language Integrated Learning

Full Text:



Cambridge ESOL (2010). Teaching Knowledge Test (TKT). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Handbook for Teachers. Retrieved March 9, 2015 from

European Communities (2009). ECTS Users' Guide. Retrieved March 9, 2015 from

European Higher Education Area (2010). Retrieved March 9, 2015 from

Eurydice (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Retrieved March 9, 2015 from

Frigols, M. J. (2007). CLIL Implementation in Spain: An Approach to Different Models. Retrieved March 9, 2015 from

Gürses, A., Açıkyıldız, M., Doğar, Ç. and Sözbilir, M. (2007). An investigation into the effectiveness of problem‐based learning in a physical chemistry laboratory course. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(1), 99 – 113.

Kruschewsky, G. (2014). 6 Multilingual Benefits That You Only Get If You Speak Another Language. The Huffington Post. Retrieved March 9, 2015 from

Marsh, D., Mehisto, P., Wolff, D. and Frigols, M. J. (2011). European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. Retrieved March 9, 2015 from

Merritt, A. (2013). Why Learn a Foreign Language? Benefits of Bilingualism. The Telegraph. Retrieved March 9, 2015 from

Paulson D. R. (1999). Active Learning and Cooperative Learning in the Organic Chemistry Lecture Class. Journal of Chemical Education, 76 (8), 1136 – 1140.

Prince M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223 – 231.

Smith M. E., Hinckley, C. C. and Volk, G. L. (1991). Cooperative learning in the undergraduate laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 68 (5), 413 – 415.

Spaeth A. D. and Black R. S. (2012), Google Docs as a Form of Collaborative Learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 2012, 89 (8), pp 1078–1079.

Tsuda S. (2003). Attitudes toward English Language Learning in Higher Education in Japan (2): Raising Awareness of the Notion of Global English. Intercultural Communication Studies XII-3, 61 – 75. Retrieved March 10, 2015 from

Abstract Views

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

This journal is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NonDerivs 4.0 Internacional License.

Universitat Politècnica de València

e-ISSN: 2341-2593