Harnessing AI for EFL Learning: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Learner Strategies and Teacher Perspectives

As artificial intelligence (AI) rapidly integrates into academic life, its application in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education remains underexplored, particularly within specific sociocultural contexts, This study addresses a critical gap in the literature: the lack of empirical research on the self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies employed by Algerian EFL students when using generative AI, and the extent to which these strategies align with instructor perspectives . The study was guided by two research questions: (1) What SRL strategies do Algerian Master’s students use when integrating AI into their academic writing tasks? (2) How do EFL teachers’ perceptions of AI’s role and associated ethical concerns compare with students’ reported practices? The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with 15 Master’s students, selected based on their self-reported use of AI for academic work multiple times per week. The quantitative phase surveyed 49 EFL university teachers on their attitudes and pedagogical approaches to AI. The findings reveal that students are not passive users; instead, they employ sophisticated SRL strategies such as adaptive goal-setting and critical self-evaluation to use AI as a “scaffolding partner.” This practice contrasts with teachers’ prevalent “cautious optimism,” which focuses more on abstract ethical concerns like plagiarism rather than on students’ emergent agentic strategies. The study concludes that students’ strategic AI use offers a foundation for developing pedagogical models centered on critical AI literacy and proposes that institutional policies should focus on guiding, rather than prohibiting, AI integration.

Show more Show less

References:

Abd-Elaal, E., Gamage, S., & Mills, J. (2019). Artificial intelligence is a tool for cheating academic integrity. Proceedings of the 2019 AAEE Conference, Brisbane, Australia.

Ahmed, M. A. (2023). ChatGPT and the EFL classroom: Supplement or substitute in Saudi Arabia’s eastern region. Information Sciences Letters, 12(7), 2727–2734. https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/120704

Belenguer, L. (2022). AI bias: Exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry. AI and Ethics, 2, 771–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00138-8

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carrier, M. (2024). AI ethics: Policy guidance for language education. The International Research Foundation for English Language Education (TIRF). https://www.tirfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/TIRF_AI_Policy_Guidance_2024.pdf

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Dou, A., & Rim, K. (2025). Measuring teachers’ AI literacy through ChatGPT prompt engineering. ATRAS journal, 6(2), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.70091/atras/vol06no02.4

Ducar, C., & Schocket, D. H. (2018). Machine translation and the L2 classroom: Pedagogical solutions for making peace with Google Translate. Foreign Language Annals, 51(4), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12366

Fazelpour, S., & Danks, D. (2021). Algorithmic bias: Senses, sources, solutions. Philosophy Compass, 16(8), e12760. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12760

Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055

Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692

Henriksen, D., & Mishra, P. (2015). We teach who we are: Creativity in the lives and practices of accomplished teachers. Teachers College Record, 117(7), 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700708

Hockly, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in English language teaching: The good, the bad and the ugly. RELC Journal, 54(2), 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231168504

Jamal, A. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in teacher education: Opportunities & challenges. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 10(1), 139–146. http://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR23A2629.pdf

Kerma, M. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on Algerian learners’ critical thinking. Atras Journal, 6(1), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.70091/Atras/vol06no01.8

Kurniati, E. Y., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-graduate students’ perceptions of Quillbot utilization in English academic writing class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 437-451. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Ma, G., & Yang, X. (2025). Fostering intercultural competence through AI driven tools: A case study of linguistic and cultural adaptability in Chinese EFL education. Digital Technologies Research and Applications, 4(1), 158-169. https://doi.org/10.54963/dtra.v4i1.1131

MacNeil, S., Kim, J., Leinonen, J., Denny, P., & Kumar, V. (2023). The implications of large language models for CS teachers and students. Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545947.3573358

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Sebbah, L. (2025). Exploring Algerian EFL students’ familiarity, use and attitudes towards generative artificial intelligence tools in education. Journal of Languages & Translation, 5(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.70204/jlt.v5i1.219

Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776-778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

Sun, D., Boudouaia, A., Yang, J., & Xu, J. (2024). Investigating students’ programming behaviors, interaction qualities and perceptions through prompt-based learning in ChatGPT. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1447. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03991-6

UNESCO. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/FC23.2023.GD.1

Vygotsky, L. L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

West, S. M., Whittaker, M., & Crawford, K. (2019). Discriminating systems: Gender, race and power in AI. AI Now Institute.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Yusuf, A., Mouas, S., Al-khresheh, M. H., & Boudouaia, A. (2026). Individual vs peer support in the AI era: Investigating students’ cognitive dispositions in design education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 59, 101986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101986

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7

Show more Show less