The epistemic representation: visual production and communication of scientific knowledge.

F. López-Cantos

doi:10.4995/muse.2015.2226

Authors

F. López-Cantos Universitat Jaume I

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2015.2226

Keywords:

Illustrations, Models, Pictures, Photography, Images, Simulation, Epistemology, Communication, Science

Abstract

Despite its great influence on the History of Science, visual representations have attracted marginal interest until very recently and have often been regarded as a simple aid for mere illustration or scientific demonstration. However, it has been shown that visualization is an integral element of reasoning and a highly effective and common heuristic strategy in the scientific community and that the study of the conditions of visual production and communication are essential in the development of scientific knowledge.

In this paper we deal with the nature of the various forms of visual representation of knowledge that have been happening throughout the history of science, taking as its starting point the illustrated monumental works and three-dimensional models that begin to develop within the scientific community around the fifteenth century. The main thesis of this paper is that any scientific visual representations have common elements that allow us to approach them from epistemic nature, heuristic and communicative dimension.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

F. López-Cantos, Universitat Jaume I

Dpto. Ciencias de la Comunicación

References

Allamel-Raffin, C. (2011): “The Meaning of a Scientific Image: Case Study in Nanoscience a Semiotic Approach, Nanoethics n. 5, pp. 165–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-011-0123-1

Appelbaum, V.; Baldasso, R. (2001): “Galileo and Kepler on the Sun as planetary mover”, LargoCampo Filosofare. Eurosymposium Galileo 2001, pp. 281-390.

Balex, D. & Carre, C. (1985): Visual Communication in Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burke, P. (2003): “Images as Evidence in Seventeenth-Century Europe”, Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 273-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2003.0023

Chen, Joseph (1999): “The Development of Anatomic Art and Sciences: The Ceroplastica Anatomic Models of La Specola”, Surgery, October 1999 - Volume 45 - Issue 4.

Chomsky, N. y Focault, M. (2006): The Chomsky-Focault Debate. On Human Nature. New York: New Press.

Coronado, G. (2006): “Heráclides y Aristarco. Propuestas astronómicas no ortodoxas en el pensamiento griego”. Coris. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, n. 4.

Daston, L. & Galison, P. (1992). “The image of objectivity”. Representations. 40(Autumn), pp. 81-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2928741

Daston, L. & Galison, P. (2007): Objectivity. New York: ZoneBooks.

De Chadarerian S. y Hopwood, N. (2004): Models: The Third Dimension of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Eco, U. (1979): Lector in fabula. Milan: Bompiani.

Ford, B. J. (1992): Images of Science: A History of Scientific Illustration. London: British Library.

Friedhoff, R. M. (1989): Visualization: The Second Computer Revolution. New York. Harry N. Abrams.

Frigg, R. & Hartmann, S. (2012): "Models in Science", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)

Frigg, R., & Reiss, J. (2008): “The philosophy of simulation: hot new issues or same old stew?” Synthese, pp. 593–613.

Galileo Galilei (1610): Siderius Nuncius, transl. A. Van Helden, Chicago (1962).

Galileo Galilei (1632): Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, trans. by Stillman Drake, University of California Press, 1953 (revised 1967).

Galison, P. (1997): Image and Logic: a Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Griesemer (2004)”Three-Dimensional Models in Philosophical Perspective”, Models: The Third Dimension of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Habermas, J. (1981): Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, traduc. Inglés en The Theory of Communicative Action (vol I 1984, vol II 1987). Boston: Beacon.

Harry, R. (1992): The Scientific Image: from cave to computer. New York: Abrahams.

Humphreys, P. (2004): Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195158709.001.0001

Humphreys, P. (2009): “The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods”, Synthese, pp. 615-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9435-2

Hüppauf, B. & Weingart, P. (2008): Science Images and Popular Images of Sciences. New York: Routledge.

Jordanova, L. (2004): “Materials, Models and Visual Culture”, Models: The Third Dimension of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Karafyllis, N. C. (2003): Biofacts. Essays on Man between Artefact and living Entity. Paderborn: Mentis.

Keller, E. F. (2000): “Models of and models for: Theory and practice in contemporary biology”, Philosophy of Science, 67 (Proceedings).

Kirby, D.A. (2011): Lab Coats in Hollywood: Scientists Impact on Cinema, Cinema's Impact on Science and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Knight, D. (2006): Public Understanding of Science. A history of communicating scientific ideas. London, New York: Routledge.

Korr-Cetina, K. (1981): The Manufacture of Knowledge. An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Kosslyn, S. (1987): “Imágenes mentales: ¿una creación imaginaria?”, en Gardner, H. La nueva ciencia de la mente. Historia de la revolución cognitiva. Barcelona: Paidós.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Kusukawa, S. (2006): “The Use of Pictures in the Formation of Learned Knowledge: The Cases of Leonard Fuchs and Andreas Vesalius”, Transmitting Knowledge: Words, images and Instruments in Early Modern Europe, Oxford. Oxford University Press, pp. 73-96

Kusukawa, S. (2010): The sources of Gessner’s pictures for the Historia animalium, Annals of Science, Vol. 67, No. 3, July 2010, pp. 303-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2010.488899

Kusukawa, S. (2011): “Picturing Knowledge In The Early Royal S(ociety: The Examples Of Richard Waller And Henry Hunt”, Notes & Records of The Royal Society.

Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979): Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage.

Latour, B. (1990) “Drawing things together”, Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, Mass. ;London : MIT Press.

Linson, H. et alii. (2003) 3D-Printing the History of Mechanisms. Cornell University.

López Cantos, F. (2010): “La imagen científica: tecnología y artefacto”, Revista Mediterranea de Comunicación, n. 1, pp. 158-172.

López Cantos, F. (2010): “Más lejos, más cerca, más color. Imaginar la ciencia en las fronteras”. II Congreso internacional de imagen,cultura y tecnología:medios ,usos y redes. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III, pp. 152-158.

Luminet, J-P. (2009), « Science, Art and Geometrical Imagination », Conferencia invitada en el IAU Symposium 260 The Role of Astronomy in Society and Culture , UNESCO, 19-23 Enero, Paris, URL = http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0911/0911.0267.pdf

Lüthy, C. & Smets, A. (2009): “Words, Lines, Diagrams, Images: Towards a History of Scientific Imagery”, Early Science and Medicine, 14 pp. 398-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157338209X425632

Lüthy, C. (2006):”Where Logical Necessity Becomes Visual Persuasion: Descarte’s Clear and Distinct Illustrations, Transmitting Knowledge: Words, images and Instruments in Early Modern Europe, Oxford. Oxford University Press.

Lynch, M. & Woolgar (1990): Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, Mass. , London: MIT Press.

Manovich, L. (2002): “The Anti-Sublime Ideal in Data Art” URL = http://www.manovich.net/DOCS/data_art.doc

Martz, E. & Francoeur E. (1997): History of Visualization of Biological Macromolecules URL = http://www.umass.edu/microbio/rasmol/history.htm>

Mazzolini, R. (1993): Non-verbal Communication in Science Prior to 1900. Firenze: Instituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza.

McGuinn, C. (2004): Mindsight: Image, Dream, Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Morgan, M. y Morison, M. (1999): “Models as mediating instruments”, “Models and autonomous agents”, Models as mediators. Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660108

Mosley, A. (2006): “Objects of Knowledge: Mathematics and Models in Sixteenth-Century Cosmology and Astronomy”, Transmitting Knowledge: Words, images and Instruments in Early Modern Europe, Oxford. Oxford University Press.

Nikolow, S. & Bluma, L. (2008): “Science Images between Scientific Fields and the Public Sphere”, en Hüppauf, B. & Weingart, P. (2008): Science Images and Popular Images of Sciences. New York: Routledge, pp-33-51.

Polanyi, M. (1967): The tacit dimension, London: Cox & Wyman.

Pólya, G. (1945): How to solve it. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Quaggiotto, M. (2012): “Images of knowledge. Interfaces for knowledge access in an epistemic transition”, Second International Workshop on Knowledge Federation, Dubrovnik, Croatia, October 3-6, 2010.

Ramón y Cajal, S. (1912): Fotografía de los colores. Bases científicas y reglas prácticas. Zaragoza : Ed. Prames (2006).

Rocke, A. J. (2010): Image & Reality. Chicago: Chicago University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226723358.001.0001

Roe, A. (1952): ‘‘A Psychologist Examines 64 Eminent Scientists.’’ Scientific American 187.5 November, pp. 21-25.

Ronald E. McRoberts, R. (2011): “Satellite image-based maps: Scientific inference or pretty pictures?”. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115 (2011) 715–724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.10.013

Rudwick, M. (1976): “The emergence of visual language for geological science,1760-1840”. History of Science, 14:1, pp. 49-95.

Shapin, S. & Schaffer, S. (1985): Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life, Princeton; Princeton University Press.

Shepard, R. & Cooper, L. (1982). Mental Images and their Transformations Cambridge,

Thomas, A. (2008): "La fotografía en pos del conocimiento", en El mundo descrito. Madrid: Fundación ICO.

Thomas, Nigel J.T., "Mental Imagery", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).

Thoren, V. (1990): The Lord of Uraniborg: A Biography of Tycho Brahe, Cambridge.

Trumbo, J. (2010): “Making Science Visible: Visual Literacy in Science Communication”, Visual Cultures of Science: rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication. Hanover, N.H.: Dartmouth Collegue Press.

Tufte, E. (2006): Beautiful Evidence. Cheshire: Graphic Press Ltd.

Van Helden, A. (1989): Siderius Nuncius. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Vickery, B. (2000): Scientific Communication in History. Boston: Scarecrow Press.

Wartofsky, M. W.c (1979): Models: representation and the scientific understanding. Dordretch, London: Reidel.

Winsberg, E. (2010): Science in the Age of Computer Simulation. Chicago, London: Chicago University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226902050.001.0001