Teaching Technical English: Corrective Feedback Based on Students’ and Teachers’ Beliefs





corrective feedback (CF), recast, explicit correction, meta-linguistic clue


The present study investigates the beliefs of students and teachers about corrective feedback (CF) regarding necessity, timing and the most effective types in technical English setting. This study was conducted at the National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” with students majoring in Information Technology, Mathematics or Physics ranged between 18 and 22 years of age. Methods included a questionnaire, interviews and classroom observations. The feedback from 55 students and 33 teachers was collected during practical classes in February – March at the beginning of the second semester of 2019-2020 academic year. This research has confirmed the necessity of CF for students and teachers. It also demonstrated the differences regarding timing: teachers preferred delayed to immediate CF, while students equally appreciated both. The research also indicated that both teachers and students preferred indirect types of CF; teachers had stronger attitudes though. The research demonstrated the most effective types of CF for students: meta-linguistic clue and repetition, while for teachers it was elicitation. Completing the survey, both teachers and students chose at least two different types of CF. The necessity of effective CF, which requires learning more about students’ and teachers’ beliefs, benefits and drawbacks of each CF type, is emphasized. The results of the present research may be used by practitioners, who would like to use CF effectively in teaching technical English. Future studies may explore CF in terms of students’ and teachers’ beliefs and behavior in different learning environments.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Oksana Chugai, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Ph.D. in Education, Associate Professor of the Department of English for Specific Purposes

Olena Ogienko, A. S. Makarenko Sumy State Pedagogical University

Prof., Dr. of Science in Education, Department of Pedagogy.


Basturkmen H. (2012). Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers' stated beliefs and practices. System, 40(2), 282-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.05.001

Brown, A. (2009). Students' and teachers' perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x

Chugai, O. (2020). Providing Effective Corrective Feedback in ESP Class. Proceedings of the II Annual Conference on Current Foreign Languages Teaching Issues in Higher Education, 90-91. https://kamts2.kpi.ua/sites/default/files/img/i%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%2014.05.2020%281%29.pdf

Chugai, O., Terenko, O., & Ogienko, O. (2017). Methods that work: best practices of adult educators in the USA. Advanced Education, 8, 72-77. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.109216

Dornyei, Z., Ryan, S. (2015). The Psychology of the Language Learner Revisited. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3-18. https://repositories.cdlib.org/uccllt/l2/vol1/iss1/art2/ - https://doi.org/10.5070/L2.V1I1.9054

Ellis, R. (2010). Cognitive, social, and psychological dimensions of corrective feedback. In R. Batstone (ed.), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 151-165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Horwitz, E.K. (1990). Attending to the affective domain in the foreign language classroom. In S.Magnan (Ed.), Shifting the instructional focus to the learners (pp. 15-33). Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.

Horwitz, E.K. (2015). Beliefs about language learning and the experience of second language learning: Asking useful questions about language learning. In H.M. McGarrell and D.Wood (Eds.), CONTACT-Refereed Proceedings of TESL Ontario Research Symposium, 41(2), (pp. 20-30).

Kartchava, E. (2016). Learners' beliefs about corrective feedback in the language classroom: perspectives from two international contexts. TESL Canada Journal 33(2), 19-45. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v33i2.1235

Lantolf, J. (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford University Press.

Li, S. (2013). Oral corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 68(2), 196-198. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct076

Li, S. (2018). Corrective Feedback in L2 Speech Production. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0247

Li, S., Zhu, Y., & Ellis, R. (2016). The effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic structure. Modern Language Journal, 100, 276-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12315

Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learners' beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x

Lytovchenko, I., Lavrysh, Y., Lukianenko, V., & O. Ogienko, O. (2020). How to Teach Grammar to Adult ESP Learners at Technical University More Communicatively: Task-Based Approach. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 7(1), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2020.12419

Lytovchenko, I., Ogienko, O., Sbruieva, A., & Sotska, H. (2018). Teaching English for specific purposes to adult learners at university: methods that work. Advanced Education, 10, 69-75. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.149741

Mori, R. (2002). Teachers' Beliefs and Corrective Feedback. JALT Journal, 24(1), 48-69. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ24.1-3

Russel, V. (2009). Corrective feedback, over a decade of research since Lyster & Ranta (1997): Where do we stand today? Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(1), 21-31. https://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/archive/v6n12009.html

Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA - Columbia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107

Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning teaching, a guide for guidebook for English language teachers. 2nd ed. Macmillan Education.

Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers' choice and learners' preference for corrective-feedback types. Language Awareness, 17(1), 78-93. https://doi.org/10.2167/la429.0

Zhang, L. J., Rahimi, M. (2014). EFL learners' anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes. System, 42, 429-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.012




How to Cite

Chugai, O., & Ogienko, O. (2021). Teaching Technical English: Corrective Feedback Based on Students’ and Teachers’ Beliefs. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2021.14016