Investigation of pressure map distribution for the design of an ergonomic cushion through computer-aided engineering
Submitted: 2025-06-30
|Accepted: 2025-09-25
|Published: 2025-10-09
Copyright (c) 2025 Luis Fernando de Jesús Barajas Patlán, Jorge Armando Ramos Frutos, Israel Miguel-Andres, Christian Enrique Nava Alcantar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Keywords:
Ergonomics, Ergonomic cushion, Pressure mapping, Finite element analysis, Taguchi methodology
Supporting agencies:
Abstract:
Prolonged occupational sedentary behavior is associated with musculoskeletal disorders and pressure ulcers, consequently diminishing quality of life and productivity. Current ergonomic cushions frequently lack a design foundation grounded in user-specific pressure data. This study developed and validated a methodology for optimizing such cushions, reversing the traditional approach by utilizing pressure mapping analysis as the initial stage. Pressure maps in a sitting position (flat surface, three postures) were characterized for 40 males (age: 25.25 ± 4.00 years; Body Mass Index: 23.83 ± 3.93 kg/m²) using a CONFORMat® software. The average pressure (12.67 ± 4.17 kPa, 12.93 ± 4.31 kPa, and 12.00 ± 3.62 kPa for the three postures, respectively) exhibited no significant variations between postures (Kruskal-Wallis, p > 0.05). These data served as the foundation for the design, which integrated Taguchi method optimization (varying geometry, thickness, and material) and the prediction of mechanical behavior through finite element analysis. The methodology resulted in a cushion design (square, viscoelastic foam) that, validated by simulation and experimental prototypes, demonstrated a more uniform pressure distribution, a reduction in average pressure, an increased contact area, and a preference expressed by the experimental group. The primary contribution lies in the proposal and validation of a methodological workflow that prioritizes pressure map analysis to inform ergonomic design, thereby offering a systematic approach to enhance the effectiveness of cushions and mitigate the adverse effects of sedentary behavior.
References:
Alawneh, O., Zhong, X., Faieghi, R., & Xi, F. (2022). Finite element methods for modeling the pressure distribution in human body–seat interactions: A systematic review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(12), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126160
Bermamet, H., Syed, S., & Amer, S. (2023). Investigating the effect of seat features and cushion material on seat comfort using finite element analysis. In IEOM Society International (pp. 1633–1640). https://doi.org/10.46254/eu05.20220315
Channak, S., Speklé, E.M., van der Beek, A.J., & Janwantanakul, P. (2024). Effect of two dynamic seat cushions on postural shift, trunk muscle activation and spinal discomfort in office workers. Applied Ergonomics, 120, 104337. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APERGO.2024.104337
Dattoli, S., Colucci, M., Soave, M.G., De Santis, R., Segaletti, L., Corsi, C., ... Galeoto, G. (2018). Evaluation of pelvis postural systems in spinal cord injury patients: Outcome research. National Library of Medicine, 43(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2018.1456768
Farfán, E. (2020). Bases morfológicas de los músculos isquiotibiales para la comprensión de sus lesiones intrínsecas. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Retrieved from https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/671373#page=1
Gutiérrez, H., & Salazar, R. (2012). Análisis y diseño de experimentos (Tercer ed.). Ciudad de México: McGraw-Hill/Interamericana.
INEGI. (2021). Comunicado de prensa núm. 115/21: Resultados de la encuesta nacional de ocupación y empleo. Resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo, COMUNICADO, 1–3.
International Organization for Standardization. (2017). ISO 7250-1 Basic human body measurements for technological design—Part 1: Body measurement definitions and landmarks.
Jarumethitanont, W., Manupibul, U., Tanthuwapathom, R., Prasertsukdee, S., Limroongreungrat, W., & Charoensuk, W. (2024). Development of low-cost pressure mapping device to evaluate force distribution for seat cushion modification. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 21804. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-024-72471-3
Katz, T., & Gefen, A. (2023). The biomechanical efficacy of a hybrid support surface in protecting supine patients from sacral pressure ulcers. International Wound Journal, 20(8), 3148–3156. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14192
Luo, S., Wang, Y., Gong, Y., Shu, G., & Xiong, N. (2017). A preliminary study of smart seat cushion design. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10291 LNCS, pp. 427–443). Hangzhou: Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58697-7_32
Mannella, D., Bellusci, M., Graziani, F., Ferraresi, C., & Muscolo, G.G. (2022). Modelling, design and control of a new seat-cushion for pressure ulcers prevention. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 236(4), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119211068908
Oliveira, A.S., & Pirscoveanu, C.I. (2021). Implications of sample size and acquired number of steps to investigate running biomechanics. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 3083. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-021-82876-Z
OMS. (2021). Trastornos musculoesqueléticos. Retrieved June 20, 2025, from https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions
Rodgers, C.D., & Raja, A. (2023). Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb, Hamstring Muscle. StatPearls. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546688/
Sae-Lee, W., Intolo, P., & Kongprasert, N. (2023). Development of seat cushion to improve lumbo-pelvic posture and pain in office workers. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2685(1), 040007. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112582
Sae Lee, W. (2020). Innovative lumbo-pelvic seating cushion to improve lumbo-pelvic posture during sitting in office workers. Srinakharinwirot University.
Sugimura, Y., & Wada, C. (2004). An analysis of the force and angle necessary to develop a standing-up assistive device. In SICE 2004 Annual Conference. https://doi.org/10.11499/SICEP.2004.0_52_4
Torres, Y., & Rodríguez, Y. (2021). Emergence and evolution of ergonomics as a discipline: Reflections on the school of human factors and the school of ergonomics of the activity. Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública, 39(2), e342868. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.e342868
Zhang, T., & Ren, J. (2024). A design method for contact contour based on the distribution of target contact pressure. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, 20(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-023-09674-5




