A Multicriteria Decision Model for the Evaluation and Selection of Technologies in a R&D Centre

R. Lizarralde, J. Ganzarain

Abstract

R&D Centres play a key role in the technology development process of industries, and therefore in their competitive strategies. They have responsibility in the identification, selection, acquisition, development and transfer of technology. Among these activities, the successful selection of new technologies is becoming a highly critical and complex challenge in the Technology Management Process. The problem of succeeding in the selection of new technologies is, from the methodological side, linked to heterogeneous key factors (technological, economic, human, and organisational). Many approaches deal with it by means of Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques and tools. Nevertheless, most of the works are related to the selection of technologies in industrial cases and very few works have been found in the bibliography related to R&D Institutions and, in particular, Technological Centres. A model for the evaluation and decision about one or several technologies based on the MIVES (Modelo Integrado de Valor para Evaluaciones de Sostenibilidad) method is proposed. Introducing the motivations for using this method, after a review of the most used MCDM methods, and describing the structure of the model and the preliminary key parameters and relations among them. The proposed model is oriented to it’s application in the manufacturing sector, observing the particularities of the sector in the selection of the critical factors related to technology, R&D Centre and Industry.


Keywords

Technology Selection; R&D Centre; MCDM; MIVES; Technology Management

Full Text:

PDF

References

Banuls, V.A., and Salmeron, J.L. (2006). A scenario-based assessment model - SBAM. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(6), 750-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.015

Brans, J.P., and Vincke, P. (1985). Note – A Preference Ranking Organisation Method. Management Science, 31(6), 647-656. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647

Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A., Seiford, L.M. (1994). Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology and applications. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0637-5

Chen, S., Hwang, C., Beckmann, M., and Krelle, W. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5

Clausen, T.H., Korneliussen, T., and Madsen, E.L. (2013). Modes of innovation, resources and their influence on product innovation: Empirical evidence from R&D active firms in Norway. Technovation, 33(6-7), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.02.002

Dalkey, N. C., and Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458

De la Concha, S. (2014). Horizonte2020, de la visión general a las oportunidades. XX y XXI Seminarios de Asesores de Proyectos de I+D de la Unión Europea.

Diffenbach, J. (1981). A compatibility approach to scenario evaluation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 19(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(81)90013-5

Dobbs, R., Manyika, J., and Roxburh, C. (2012). Manufacturing the future: The next era of global growth and innovation. McKinsey Global, (November).

Felipe, J., Aashish, M., and Changyong, R. (2014). Manufacturing Matters... but it’s the Jobs that Count. Asian Development Bank Working Paper No. 420.

Gregory, M.J. (1995). Technology management - a process approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 209(5), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1995_209_094_02

Grimaldi, M., Cricelli, L., Giovanni, M. Di, and Rogo, F. (2015). The patent portfolio value analysis: A new framework to leverage patent information for strategic technology planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 286-302 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.013

Guan, J.C., Yam, R.C.M., Tang, E.P.Y., Lau, A.K.W. (2009). Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition: Evidences in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 38(5), 802-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.009

Hartmann, M.H. (1999). Theory and practice of technological corporate assessment. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17(4), 504-521. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1999.002730

Kaldor, N. (1967). Strategic Factors in Economic Development. Ithaca: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University.

McGrath, R.G., MacMillan, I.C. (2000). Assessing technology projects using real options reasoning. Research-Technology Management, 43(4), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2000.11671367

Ordoobadi, S.M., Mulvaney, N.J. (2001). Development of a justification tool for advanced manufacturing technologies-value analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18(2),157-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(01)00033-9

Phaal, R., Paterson, C.J., and Probert, D.R. (1998). Technology management in manufacturing business: process and practical assessment. Technovation, 18(8-9), 541-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00026-1

Phaal, R., Farrukh, C.J.P., and Probert, D.R. (2001). A framework for supporting the management of technological innovation. Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 1-14.

Rohrbeck, R., Heuer, J., and Arnold, H. (2006). The Technology Radar - An instrument of technology intelligence and innovation strategy. ICMIT 2006 Proceedings - 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, 2(September 2017), 978-983. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2006.262368

Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA214804

Saaty, T.L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback, the Analytic Hierarchy Process, (RS Publications: Pittsburgh, PA).

Slowinski, G., Stanton, S.A., Tao, J.C., Miller, W., and McConnell, D.P. (2000). Acquiring external technologies, Res. Technol. Manag., 43(5), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2000.11671378

Tipping, J.W., Zeffren, E., Fusfeld, A.R. (1995). Assessing the value of your technology, Res. Technol. Manag., Vol. 38(5), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1995.11674292

Viñolas, B., Cortés, F., Marques, A., Josa, A., and Aguado, A. (2009). MIVES: Modelo integrado de valor para evaluaciones de sostenibilidad. II Congrés Internacional de Mesura I Modelització de La Sostenibilitat, 1-24.

Willyard, C.H., McClees, C.W. (1987). Motorola’s technology roadmap process, Res. Manag., 30(5), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00345334.1987.11757057

Winebrake, J.J., Creswick, B.P. (2003). The future of hydrogen fueling systems for transportation: an application of perspective-based scenario analysis using the analytic hierarchy process, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(4), 359-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00189-5

Abstract Views

469
Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM




This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Universitat Politècnica de València

e-ISSN: 2340-4876     ISSN: 2340-5317   https://doi.org/10.4995/ijpme