Developing a novel based productivity model by investigating potential bounds of production plant

Zahid Hussain


Productivity level is based on reliability impression which is the primary aspect of the automatic assembly line for continuous production. Productivity forecasting is a professional tool helping to enhance production system and attain the client petition by using precise model. Due to mechanisms complexity of assembly lines, analysis of failure factors contributes a significant role for investigating potential bounds that require analytical approach to compare the current and proposed model of productivity effects. The issues related to the production losses need additional space for improvement of the productivity model which may not present a close comparison between the current and proposed productivity rate. The main purpose of this paper is to develop a novel based productivity model that will predict alternatives for the availability of assembly line workspaces pertain to an automobile tire manufacturing plant. For investigating the potential bounds of the productivity losses, DMAIC and PACE techniques were used. It was revealed that the novel productivity model yielded better results of 3.358% errors showing its accuracy as compared to real productivity level at different workspaces.


Automatic assembly lines; availability; Productivity level; productivity models

Full Text:



Bauerdick, C.J.H., Helfert, M., Petruschke, L., Sossenheimer, J., & Abele, E. (2018). An automated procedure for workpiece quality monitoring based on machine drive-based signals in machine tools. Procedia CIRP, 72, 357-362.

Dresch, A., Veit, D.R., Lima, P.N. de, Lacerda, D.P., & Collatto, D.C. (2019). Inducing Brazilian manufacturing SMEs productivity with Lean tools. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(1), 69-87.

Edgar, T.F., & Pistikopoulos, E.N. (2018). Smart manufacturing and energy systems. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 114, 130-144.

Fettermann, D.C., Cavalcante, C.G.S., Almeida, T.D. de, & Tortorella, G.L. (2018). How does Industry 4.0 contribute to operations management? Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 35(4), 255-268.

Gharfalkar, M., Ali, Z., & Hillier, G. (2018). Measuring resource efficiency and resource effectiveness in manufacturing. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 1854-1881.

Giovannetti, E., & Piga, C.A. (2017). The contrasting effects of active and passive cooperation on innovation and productivity: Evidence from British local innovation networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 102-112.

Gupta, S.K., Gupta, S., & Dhamija, P. (2019). An empirical study on productivity analysis of Indian leather industry. Benchmarking, 26(3), 815-835.

Gupta, V., Jain, R., Meena, M.L., & Dangayach, G.S. (2018). Six-sigma application in tire-manufacturing company: a case study. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 14(3), 511-520.

Hussain, Z. (2018). Envisaging Maintenance Costs of Hydraulic Press in the Ceramic Industry with Regression Modelling. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 9(10), 1921-1928. Retrieved from

Hussain, Z. (2019). Statistical Analyses of Productivity Model Parameters for Process Improvement. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 13(2), 157-167.

Manitz, M. (2008). Queueing-model based analysis of assembly lines with finite buffers and general service times. Computers and Operations Research, 35(8), 2520-2536.

Morales Méndez, J.D., & Rodriguez, R.S. (2017). Total productive maintenance (TPM) as a tool for improving productivity: a case study of application in the bottleneck of an auto-parts machining line. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 92(1–4), 1013-1026.

Nawanir, G., Fernando, Y., & Teong, L.K. (2018). A Second-order Model of Lean Manufacturing Implementation to Leverage Production Line Productivity with the Importance-Performance Map Analysis. Global Business Review, 19(3_suppl), S114-S129.

Neha Gupta, N.G. (2013). An Application of DMAIC Methodology for Increasing the Yarn Quality in Textile Industry. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 6(1), 50-65

Sin, T.C., Usubamatov, R., Hamzas, M.F.B.M.A., Wai, L.K., Yao, T.K., & Bahari, M.S. (2014). Parameters Investigation of Mathematical Model of Productivity for Automated Line with Availability by DMAIC Methodology. Journal of Applied Mathematics, Article ID 206717.

Singh, J., Singh, H., & Sharma, V. (2018). Success of TPM concept in a manufacturing unit – a case study. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(3), 536-549.

Study and Analysis the Wastage Reduction of Fluorescent Powder in CFL 23 W in Philips Pvt Ltd Mohali, Using Six Sigma Methodology. (2016). International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR).

Xu, X. (2017). Machine Tool 4.0 for the new era of manufacturing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 92(5-8), 1893-1900

Yan, W., Lin, S., Kafka, O.L., Yu, C., Liu, Z., Lian, Y., ... Liu, W.K. (2018). Modeling process-structure-property relationships for additive manufacturing. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 13(4), 482-492

Yazdi, P.G., Azizi, A., & Hashemipour, M. (2019). A hybrid methodology for validation of optimization solutions effects on manufacturing sustainability with time study and simulation approach for SMEs. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(5), 1454.

Zhang, D., Sun, S., Qiu, D., Gibson, M. A., Dargusch, M. S., Brandt, M., ... Easton, M. (2018). Metal Alloys for Fusion-Based Additive Manufacturing. Advanced Engineering Materials, 20, 1700952.

Abstract Views

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives- 4.0 International License 

Universitat Politècnica de València

e-ISSN: 2340-4876     ISSN: 2340-5317