The new delivery model of the CAP: Some relevant issues


  • Tomás García Azcárate Instituto de Economía, Geografía y Demografía del CSIC; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (CEIGRAM)
  • Carina Folkeson Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (CEIGRAM)



CAP, New delivery model, Strategic Plan


A key element of the European Commission´s proposal for the post-2020 CAP is the re-quirement for the EU Member States to present their proposed interventions in the form of a Strategic Plan. We addresses six sensitive issues: Similarities between the new architecture and the Rural Development historical management; performance reserve and duration of the financial perspectives; declared ambitions for the Strategic Plans; lengths of those Plans and an administrative challenge, in Spain and perhaps in other Member states. Our conclusion is that a real change is achievable but we should give time to time and that a step-by-step implementation is advisable.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tomás García Azcárate, Instituto de Economía, Geografía y Demografía del CSIC; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (CEIGRAM)


Bijman, J. (2015). Research for AGRI Committee -Towards New Rules for the Eu’s Fruit and Vegetable Sector. Brussels: European Parliament. Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies.

Blagoeva, S. & Ignat, A. (2019). “The New Delivery Model of the EU CAP after 2020”. Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, 16(1), 53-64.

Erjavec, E., Lovec, M., Juvancic, L., Sumrada, T., Rac, I., Jongeneel, R.A., Silvis, H., Poppe, K. & García Azcárate, T. (2018). Research for AGRI Committee – The CAP Strategic Plans beyond 2020: Assessing the architecture and governance issues in order to achieve the EU-wide objectives. Brussels: European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies. Retrieved from: STU(2018)629174

European Commission. (2017). Future of Food and Farming. Retrieved from:

European Court of Auditors. (2018). Opinion No 7/2018: Concerning Commission proposals for regulations relating to the Common Agricultural Policy for the post-2020 period. Retrived from: aspx?did=47751

European Court of Auditors. (2017). Special report “Rural Development Programming: Less complexity and more focus on results needed”. Retrieved from:

Fährmann, B. & Grajewski, R. (2018). “Will the Future CAO lead to Less Implementation Costs and Higher Impacts of Rural development Programmes?” The communication presented to 162 EAAE Seminar. Budapest. Retrieved from:

Féret, S. (2019). “What is the Proposed Delivery Model?” Agricultural and Rural Convention Series. Retrieved from:

Fernández Farreres, G. (1993). “La subvención y el reparto de competencias entre el estado y las Comunidades Autónomas”. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, 13(38), 225-239.

Freistaat Sachsen. (2016). Reorientation of EAFRD funding after 2020 (EAFRD-reset). Retreived from:

García Azcárate, T. (2018). Research for AGRI Committee–The sectoral approach in the CAP beyond 2020 and possible options to improve the EU food value chain. Brussels: European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies. Retrieved from: html?reference=IPOL_STU%282018%29617503

German Scientific Board on Agricultural Policy, Food and Consumer health Protection at BMEL. (2019). Designing an Effective Agri-environment-climate policy as Part of the Post-2020 EU Common Agricultural Policy, Berlin.

Hogan, P. (2018). Speech on “New CAP Delivery Model” at Event for ENRD, Rural Development Managing Authorities and MS Paying Agencies. Retrieved from:

IEEP. (2007). The Consequences of Climate Change for EU Agriculture. Follow-up to the COP21-UN Paris Climate Change Conference. Retrieved from: https://ieep. eu/publications/the-consequences-of-climate-change-for-eu-agriculture-follow-up-to-the-cop21-un-climate-change

IEEP. (2018). Ideas for defining environmental objectives and monitoring systems for a results-oriented CAP post 2020. Retrieved from: articles/attachments/93d92d25-76a2-48c4-957e-86c96f10b75e/IEEP%20-%20 CAP%20Performance%20Delivery%20for%20WWF%20-%20final%20130218. pdf?v=63686429823

IPES. (2019). Towards a Common Food policy for the European Union. Retrieved from:

Jongeneel, R., Erjavec, E., García Azcárate, T. & Silvis, H. (2019). “Assessment of the Common Agricultural Policy After 2020”. In Dries, L., Heijman, W., Jonge¬neel, R., Purnhagen, K. & Wesseler, J. (Eds.): EU Bioeconomy Economics and Policies: Volume I (pp. 207-228). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Kiryluk-Dryjska, E. & Baer-Nawrocka, A. (2019). “Reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy of the EU: Expected results and their social acceptance”. Journal of Policy Modeling, 41, 607-622.

Matthews, A. (2018). “Evaluating the legislative basis for the new CAP Strategic Plans”. Cap Reform blog. Retrieved from:

Matthews, A. (2019). “What will the European Parliament elections mean for CAP reform?” Cap Reform blog. Retrieved from:

McEldowney, J. & Kelly, P. (2019). “CAP Strategic Planning: Operational perspectives”. European Parliamentary Research Service. Retrieved from: http:// IDA(2019)640139.

Stierle, S. (2018). CAP reform: Achieving more with less funding. EURACTIV Special Report. Retrieved from: news/cap-reform-achieving-more-with-less-funding/

Was, A., Malak-Rawlikowska, A. & Majewski, E. (2018). “The new Delivery Model of the Common Ahgricultural Policy after 2020 – Challenges for Poland”. Problems of Agricultural Economics, 4(357), 33-59.

Zamburlini, M.G. & García Azcárate, T. (2015). “ La réforme de la PAC post-2013: Un archipel d’ONG environnementales entre différenciation et coordination”. Economie Rurale, 347, 21-37.